The fixtures you quote attracted 1500 and 1800 last year anyway so there'll be no "shock horror"
It should be apparent by now that London are not in Superleague for their attendances.
They are in for other reasons.
As for the benefits of booting London out and replacing them with another club with awful attendances then let's go ahead.
The challenge is to name a club that will bring more to the game than London across the board.
Also take on board that when it's important for SL clubs to save £100K each on junior development they aren't going to upset Mr. Hughes who puts in what?? £1,000,000 into Superleague a year?
Let's not narrow the argument down or we'll be kicking clubs out because they have an awful shirt.
Which means Widnes out on Sunday's showing.
That post is a fair assessment but it seems to me to be wrong that London are not in danger because of their attendances but potential SL applicants have to demonstrate a pre set level of attendances when they are not yet even in SL. I think the crowd criterium should be removed from licence applications.