Jump to content

Padge

Coach
  • Posts

    17,953
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    13

Padge last won the day on February 16 2023

Padge had the most liked content!

About Padge

  • Birthday 11/11/1958

Member Profile

  • Location
    Wigan
  • Interests
    Rugby league, obviously, I support Wigan and St.Judes.<br />Photography, keen amateur.<br />Rugby league's social history.<br />Local history.<br />Travel.

Recent Profile Visitors

16,712 profile views

Padge's Achievements

9.3k

Reputation

  1. If this a reference to anything I posted I genuinely do not have a clue what it is about,
  2. Cas have fallen foul of failing to fulfil past promises that they used to stay in SL. If they chose to lose by having a ###### squad so they have money to spend on a stadium now is irrelevant, they didn't do as they promised and they are now have to pay the price. Having a ###### side this year will not build a stadium next year, will IMG fall for the bu!!$h!t like the RFL did, I think possibly not.
  3. I did, you wouldn't be in the situation if you had followed up on promises. Therefore you should accept your fate and not whinge about IMG.
  4. They should have built the new stadium years ago when they promised to do so they could stay in SL.
  5. Explain why the way decisions were made changed then. Chapter and verse, why?
  6. Its amazing how the early clamp down on high shots reduced high shots, so much so that they could reduce the punishment. A short sharp shock can have quick results.
  7. The way the decision is made was changed because fans complained. It used to be ref didn't know give it video ref. Complaints when ref had a good view. If unsure ref passed back to on-field ref, people complained, benefit of doubt. So we now have ref gives his opinion which can only be overturned by obvious, repeat OBVIOUS, reason. Whinge all you want you have two options over who gets the say, but you can't have both without ref and VR standing over a screen for 10 minutes to work it out.
  8. He has to have evidence it isn't a try, obvious evidence. Blurred slow mo doesn't give that, you need high speed cameras that show clear frame by frame. When refs didn't give an opinion people complained, when refs give an opinion people complain. You can't have both, and one or the other is going to anger people.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.