Jump to content

bobrock

Coach
  • Content Count

    179
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

Member Profile

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

1,233 profile views
  1. Please forgive me for the naive question. Five minutes ago the umpire gave the australian batsman out for LBW but after the review his decision was overturned because the ball bounced outside of the imaginary line that goes from one stump at one end of the wicket to the stump at the other end, and the official words used were, if I remember well, "pitch outside leg". Why there isn't a actual chalk line drawn to help the umpire to figure where that imaginary line is ?
  2. This forum is always full of valuable information. Shaun Edwards says that: “In the end, the game is still the same; there’s big men in the middle, you need two tricky halfbacks and on top that, you need a tricky hooker who will understand the game” I dared to think the same myself, but feared it was caused by typical union snobbery or contempt. I still believe you are a bit over sensitive about your beloved game.
  3. I didn't follow closely the whole thing but one thing still baffles me. Why are all so sure that the "lack of praparation" explanation is just an excuse ? If his last job in rugby league was in 2000 it means he's been committed in another game for almost 20 years. Why is it so unlikely that he just felt not ready ?
  4. I understand Mr. Boycott is a strong character and probably a divisive one, so these reactions are more than justified, but I was just looking for some explanations about the fact that statistics don't seem to confirm some things I read about the way he used to play.
  5. Last week Theresa May showed her determination to stay in power and lead the government, and used as example the playing style of cricketer Geoffrey Boycott. I know very little about cricket but it’s easy for everyone to look for information about him, and find out that he was more keen to defend the wicket than going for risky shots . So forget about fours and sixes, stay at the crease as long as you can and runs will come. I’ve tried to find evidence of this in the stats section of ESPN Cricinfo website. A lot of them seemed quite useful: slowest 100, slow batting ( by runs scored ), longest innings ( by minutes or by balls ). To my surprise I could find the name of Geoffrey Boycott only in the longest innings stat, but well down in the table, behind many other cricketers I have never heard to be known for a conservative style of play ( Chris Gayle for example ). Those stats were about Tests and I didn’t find some for First Class cricket. Statistics never tell the whole story, but I am still baffled. He scored a lot of hundreds, and if I understand correctly how runs are scored in cricket, some of those hundreds had be slow because of the high number of dot balls, and the score moving slowly. Every time I think my knowledge of cricket is improving, there’s a setback.
  6. I have looked at the ESPN database and I've found there all I wanted to know. Thank you.
  7. Looking at a scoreboard I see wickets are always credited to the bowler. Although this habit looks well established and I know very little about the game, I dare to say this looks quite unfair, as wickets can come from outstanding catches, in which case I think the merit should be shared with the fielder. But that's the way it goes. Still I wonder if someone ever cared about keeping note about how many wickets fall exclusively for the batsman being either bowled or lbw, without any other player than the bowler involved. After all, how can the mere number of wickets taken be seen as the real measure of the bowler's quality, if easy catches dropped and difficult catches held are so iportant in the outcome ?
  8. Sorry if this will sound naive, but I find it strange. If there are 8 teams in the Big Bash, why don't they play 14 rounds ?
  9. These examples are well chosen and I have to say they offer a completely new point of view to me. Thank you for your posts
  10. Thank you for your reply. It seems there are endless implications to be discussed by fans and this is good for the sport, I guess. Just one more thing if you don't mind. The fielding restrictions make me thing of something "artificial", something made up to make viable what was inherently flawed and bland. Like turning a whole football match in a perennial penalty shoot-out and then trying to change the rules of penalty taking because you realize that was you have invented is not interesting enough. I understand the commercial implications, but it looks to me that in a few years time there will be no more cricketers, but only "T20 cricketers" and "other forms cricketers", and the two groups will be apart.
  11. Thank you for your post. What you wrote is clear and logical but I wonder how these "rules" are transferred in T20 as one innings lasts 90 minutes.
  12. Thank you for your post. Maybe you could bring further my education telling me something about the bowlers. It seems to me that fast bowlers are always the first to play, and spinners and seamers (or whatever other name they have) come in to play later. Is that true or did I pay little attention ? And if it's true, is it because of the state of the ball, or bacause of the state of the pitch, or for some other reason ?
  13. I wonder why Australians write the score putting the number of wickets before the number of runs. It seems to me they are the only ones doing it. If this is understandable in Test cricket, as you need to get 20 wickets to win the match, I can't see why they do it in ODI's and T20s where, unless you go all out within the 20 overs, the number of wickets taken is irrelevant. I also don't understand why, in limited overs cricket, teams winning the match batting second are said to have won "by wickets". For what I understood about the game, the size of the win is shown much more by how many balls were spared than how many batsmen were still available. If they bat the 20 overs with no loss and win with last ball it's said they won by 10 wickets, but that doesn't show how close the match was. The more I read the less I get. Cricket is still a mysterious matter to me.
  14. Too many different terms can be used, depends on the mood. Are you sure you're not chippy as well ?
×
×
  • Create New...