Jump to content

SUPERSTUD

Coach
  • Posts

    122
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SUPERSTUD

  1. It’s certainly been a long tough season with far too many players utilised throughout. I think someone put a post up stating 45 players used so far. I can’t recall at any stage during our season where we have looked anywhere near building any form of team cohesion. With that in mind I do not fully blame the players although I certainly agree that some attitudes and desire have been verging on being appalling. Players is a subjective matter though with supporters having differing views. Which one’s need moving on. We all have our thoughts but ultimately it is down to the coaching staff to decide. I am confident that LF is the right man for the now and taking us forward. As you say at the moment his hands are pretty much tied with what he has been handed to him. From speaking with various individuals I know LF and his staff are already working hard and planning for the future. This club has just recently got itself a very good coach who is no mug and before anyone say’s it no I am not LF and I am not connected to LF in anyway whatsoever.
  2. Can’t speak for every player but I know some who care. However they can’t change or influence other older more embedded pee poor attitudes.
  3. Attended today and I honestly did not see that result coming based on recent performances v Widnes and Newcastle. With respect Batley we’re nothing special but we made them look like world beaters. How many basic simplistic mistakes can a team make in one game? This is not a team it is a group of individuals who have been thrown together. This group does not fight for each other! For me Champ 1 is nailed on. Needs stripping back to basics with a core group of players who are willing to fight for and uphold the values that the club should be proud to strive for. Some of the current group do not want to be at the club. It is clear to see. Although I will also say that they have not been helped by poor off field decisions along the way. Not about finger pointing today in view of the fact that no player came out of it smelling of roses! Now is the time to concentrate on planning ahead.
  4. Correct. It was the ref who correctly overruled the touch judge. The Dewsbury player clearly knocked the ball in a backwards motion from the short kick off. I was literally 15 metres away with the same angle of view as the near side touch judge.
  5. To add a bit of context to the referee subject. I personally thought the ref at Newcastle (Mr Bennett) I believe it was reffed the game very well. When the ref is fairly unnoticeable you know it’s going well.
  6. Agreed. Don’t know if hooker Butterworth is confident passing to his right as opposed to passing to his left. So at Newcastle he passed about 90% to his left during our attacking moves. The players on the right edge were getting more and more visibly frustrated. Butterworth played full 80 so pattern continued throughout.
  7. Not 100% sure but I think the late penalty was given for offside. I could be wrong. Regarding our attack. It’s basically still a work in progress I suppose. However if we remain one dimensional then better opposition will quite easily snuff us out.
  8. Attended game and as LF stated during post match interview a good effort by all of the Rams players. Newcastle have a lot of work to do! Rams attack needs varying as everything went through Sykes and down Rams left edge. All passes around the back to Turner and no hitting the lead runner. Bailey Gill was basically redundant as an attacking threat on Rams right edge making defensive reads easy to deal with. Things looking better and hopefully a bit more composure next game.
  9. Lee sorry I can’t watch it without laughing. I just watched a couple of minutes of episode 4 in June with Rod Studd. It really is poacher turned gamekeeper stuff on PC’s behalf. I still have a clear vision of him laying prone at Wilderspool v Wigan feigning injury. Then jumps up before racing Andy Goodway and attacking him from behind. What grade would that be? To me it’s like putting Ronnie Biggs in charge of British Rail!
  10. Ok and thanks for that. I will do that now and thanks again.
  11. Yeah get what you are saying. However I think even the most massive supporter of the current discipline process would secretly accept that it is fraught with inconsistent dangers. Which expert(s) deem that a head high shot is of the malicious type? Cullen maybe - Sorry couldn’t resist!
  12. Tough one for me this. I am an ex referee and a parent of a current ex Super League now Championship player. I honestly feel that Alex could have dealt with the situation better. The 8 game ban concerns me. The reason is this. My son could be the recipient of a malicious head high concussive shot. Fail subsequent HIA’ s meaning sidelined and missing out on potential win bonuses! Offender may receive 3,4 or 5 matches. Yet referee Smail is wrongly double palmed in the back offender receives 8 matches. Need to get my head around this one!
  13. Like I have said before and I will say it again. SOME of our players are good enough. SOME are absolutely way off. Ok here goes. “Hi Nene McDonald and Krisnan Inu. Would you like to come and play for the Rams and receive garbage service out wide all year and by the way you will be playing behind a dominated pack every week”! “Oh no thanks I think we will pass on that one and keep taking the easy money”! SOME of our lads are working their gonads off. Some are trying and some just need to forget it.
  14. Do you ever post anything positive?
  15. Gave it a go and it is what it is. Spotted two potential rule breaches by Leigh today not that it affected the result. 1. Two members of staff up and down the South Stand touch line carrying water. Both were actually shouting instructions to the Leigh players during the game. Basically not allowed and should have been dealt with by officials. 2. Krisnan Inu not wearing official match day kit. His socks were white training socks. Just saying.
  16. Echo Coolie’s comments. Thank you for your service and good luck going forward. Noted you were in attendance in what appeared to be hospitality section at Widnes. No doubt willing the team on. Did not know you were about to exit the club but can fully understand why you may wish to do so. All the best.
  17. Respect your view as always. I agree the performance did not amount to anything special. However IMO the levels of desire and commitment have improved since LF came in. Fitness levels are what they are baffles me somewhat. Again IMO the better teams are usually the fitter teams. As I understand it LF has told certain players to get fitter or risk not being selected. That’s all I will say. I agree Widnes created more chances and bombed some. Quicker yes. Faster yes. Stronger not sure. It is my belief that this group will be harder to roll under LF.
  18. Good stuff WR. I honestly felt sorry for the team at the end today. 27 degree heat (For both teams like) and they all put a shift in. They were visibly gutted on the hooter. However it’s coming. Let’s just stick together.
  19. Attended today. Great effort and desire from every Rams player. Draw may have been a fair result. Widnes 10% slicker with ball in hand. Good signs going forward in respect of this current Rams group who look fitter as a collective unit. Understand LF has told certain players they need to get fitter in order to compete at the required levels. Fair enough. Widnes only as good as what they were allowed to be. This Rams group deserve better support to bolster their improvement efforts.
  20. Tonight should tell you everything you need to know about Bradford’s current standards!
  21. As individuals some of the Rams players may be on a par with some of the players from the team’s you mention. However it may not be apparent because of the respective collective units they are playing within. That being the case a player playing in a less competitive team may not be in a position to showcase his full credentials. Personally I would question Bradford being amongst the teams mentioned. IMO they are very much an up and down team with selection differing from week to week! Some players come on to the market really late and as such slot in where there is an opportunity available. It does not mean that they are not capable of operating within a more solid/rounded team. Other factors also come into it such as club location and work commitments. Some of the players have hardly been given a chance under the previous regime. Surely everyone could see the ship was drifting towards the rocks before we eventually brought a new captain in.
  22. With respect I think you doing some of the players a disservice. There are some good individuals who would prosper with a better collective unit around them. Being put through gaps etc. To inadvertently suggest that at best 90% are League One standard is off the mark IMO. Various factors have contributed to where we currently are.
  23. Attended game. Although today it has not helped our overall situation I have only ever asked the lads for one thing- Effort. Today IMHO they all showed effort. Thank you lads. Keep heads up and let’s crack on.
×
×
  • Create New...