Jump to content

Toby Chopra

Coach
  • Content Count

    722
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Toby Chopra

  1. How is this game not on TV? Tie of the round. Come on Elstone, sort it out!
  2. As I said on the original thread, it's just utterly ludicrous that Superleague doesn't have the power to block a signing in the name of protecting the brand of the competition. Folau's legal position is irrelevant, no player is entitled to a contract, and all signings should be at the discretion of the league. Pretty much every other major sports league has this power. The fact that SL doesn't shows what a weak organisation it is. A strong league commissioner must be the way forwards.
  3. A player should do what they're asked to do in the short run, while at the same time it's perfectly reasonable for a player to be unhappy with being played out of their best position if the club thinks they have someone better. Players only have a few years of top performance in them and have a right to make the most of it. Kelly should play hooker but with the proviso that if he's doesn't win his place back in the halves by mid-season, the club will grant him a transfer.
  4. The fact that the RFL/SL had no power to block him really sums up for me how unfit for purpose the organizational structure of our game is, and it explains why we really fail to kick on as a sport in the UK. Every other major sports league has the power to block a player if it's deemed to be bringing the competition as a whole into disrepute. NFL, NRL, Premier league, all put the collective ahead of the individual clubs, and the clubs consent to it because they understand that in the long term they all benenfit from strong leadership. But not us. Which is why we won't kick on as each club will put itself first. Catalans aren't even a member of the RFL, they're a guest, right? What guest joins a party and then trashes the place and the host can't do anything about it? Pathetic.
  5. I think this signing is really going to test the limits of that maxim
  6. The whole 'Superleague breakaway' doesn't seem to have added up to much if Elstone can't prevent a player he clearly thinks will damage the competition from playing. Difficult to say what the net effect of the signing will be. If he plays a blinder and keeps his mouth shut (and off the Internet), I expect he'll probably be a net boost to the competition. But a shadow of the past events will dog him for the rest of his days and that will impact us too. That said, if there hadn't been a scandal then we'd have never had a chance to sign him anyway.
  7. I like it. Yes, some of the players were a bit stilted, but combined with the video you started to get a glimpse of some characters who we can follow through the year. And SBW? Just 100% box office.
  8. I work for an international media organisation whose sports coverage is run by a bunch of union fanatics. Today, for the first time in at least the 14 years that I've been there, we published domestic UK rugby league story that wasn't about drugs or a cross code issue. All about SBW and Toronto in SL. I never thought I'd see the day. (Oh and by the way the interview was done at the Manchester City media facility. So many resources in the northwest just crying out to be linked up with)
  9. Two different points there. I'd agree that if the squad is predominantly based in the the Northwest, then there shouldn't be any automatic living costs enhancemnt like there is for, say, London. However I'd view any additional reimbursements as business costs, rather than salary. When I travel for work, my company picks up the tab, not me, including reasonable accommodation, food and drink etc. (I know technically they are 'home' games, but in reality the players are travelling for work.) As long as the additional sums can be shown to be genuinely related to travelling overseas for work, then they shouldn't count against the cap.
  10. I tend to feel it it shouldn't have to even be a question: why do we still have the distinction between pro and amateur? The game should be "open", no? Sure, different divisions and leagues could have different salary caps and other criteria for membership. But what is gained from a strict separation of pro and amateur? We should open up a gangway between the pro game and amateur game and leave it up to the clubs to decide if they want to pay their players anything.
  11. I was sceptical about the draw structure because I was sceptical about the ability of the sport to sell the tournament without a blockbuster to start with. But the organisers have exceeded every expectation and I'm delighted to have been proved wrong. Early days, but this could really be something special.
  12. Apart from Kingston Park, all the non-marquee venues are so close together I reckon they might just rotate all the teams around them, rather than having teams staying in one or two places. Depends if you think local communities want to adopt a team as their own, or see as many teams as possible. If they're going to hit their ticket targets they're going to have to sell a lot beyond the local area anyway. I also think Tonga, Aus and NZ need to be spread as widely as possible round the country.
  13. There are 3 big stadiums that need filling for non-England games: Boro, Hull and Coventry. I presume they will host the marquee games in the other groups: Aus vs Fiji, NZ vs Lebanon and Tonga vs PNG. Is there a natural tie-up for any of those?I reckon TongaPNG for Hull, the other 2 could go either way. I desperately need to see Tonga this tournament, and the Tonga/PNG is arguably the best game of the group phase.
  14. This literally isn't true. If it was, then we wouldn't be having all these arguments. The sport has been shrinking for years even in some of its traditional heartlands and its nothing to do with foreign teams. It's to do with the fact that the game here has done almost nothing since 1996 to adapt to the changing sporting, social, economic and media environment that it exists in. It's losing relevance even in its northern heartland, and that's no one's fault but its own. Now, do I think pins-on-the-map expansion is the only way to turn this around? No, of course not, we do indeed need to find ways to reinvigorate the heartlands. But without investment and new ideas, none of this will happen. Done properly, some expansion projects can provide that to the benefit of all.
  15. This is a lazy pastiche of US sports. Yes, some clubs have moved, but the vast majority haven't and never will, and are deeply rooted in their cities, and have been for a century. You might not like the sports and fan culture but millions do and it's the height of arrogance to think that rugby league - which in this country has serious existential problems - has nothing to learn from the most successful pro sports culture on the planet.
  16. This is the nub of it. If you think "existing clubs" are in competition with new ones, then any expansion is destined to fail as it's literally not in the existing clubs' interests for the new ones to succeed. We need a leap of imagination that sees the sport as a single whole, with clubs just being one of the stakeholders. The only compeption we should be worrying about is the competition for the attention of the public between Rugby League - and literally everything else. That's what the North American sports do: they view the league, even the sport, as a whole as the product. The clubs are just a way of accessing it. And if they can expand it to new markets, they'll do whatever it takes to do it.
  17. But if the aim isn't 'superleague in 5 years' (or preferably 3) then what is it? And how does that become sustainable for an overseas team? In my view it doesn't, given L1 is barely sustainable for heartland clubs running on a shoestring. For overseas expansion clubs, the aim has to be a fully pro team playing in, or close to, the top division. A part time, local players model just doesn't work for an international team. Toronto is working, but we have to learn the right lessons.
  18. This is a good point. YT would immediately multiply many times our reach, and it's now ubiquitous for many sports. Football and cricket highlights are now uploaded by rights holders very quickly. It's the go-to platform for many now. I suppose in theory the advantage of driving people towards OurLeague is that it becomes the one-stop shop of RL where clubs and governing bodies can cross sell tickets for SL and internationals, and the full range of merch. In fact there's sections for all of this on OurLeague, but as usual it's very thinly content wise, with most club product missing. <tosses grenade> I'd like to see CVC take over the running of OurLeague having bought controlling commercial rights for SL and England brands...
  19. I don't quite understand this. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't all this get worked through last year? It was a bit dicey at times but ultimately, and not least because of a surprising degree of unity among the Ch clubs, a deal was agreed that kept the SL clubs in the RFL, restored P&R and fixed a formula for how the next broadcasting contract would be shared. It's all done and dusted. Just up to the clubs to do their bit now.
  20. I'll have to challenge your assertion that money from Sky was "completley wasted". Compared to what? On what measure? It was quite conceivable that British rugby league - a sport that before Sky had just 1 fully pro team - could have shrivelled up and died in the 90s, in the face of pro union, the soccer boom and other broadcasting and economic changes. Instead it took some radical decisions and is still going - with a fully pro top tier - 25 years later. Many mistakes along the way, of course, and the future is uncertain. But we've really got to get away that there was some sort of miracle possible if we'd done something different. The miracle is that we're still going at all.
  21. I did not know that London is still a shareholder in SLE. That is... complicated to say the least.
  22. I'm not sure what bailing out is necessary, for either code. If it fails, PE takes the loss, not the sport. We're essentially broke as it is, so in my view there isn't much downside for RL. All the issues about the viability of the lower tiers and community game exist whether CVC comes in or not.
  23. I actually think that's a fair question to ask. But any analysis of the situation would tell a PE investor that a "merger" of some sorts was impossible, unnecessary and unproductive. So the question is more, does having an independent investor in all camps open the way to other sorts of cooperation that the sports themselves couldn't countenance? Does RU prem + SL + Pro14 = Rugby Channel?
×
×
  • Create New...