Click

Attendances are massively up compared to last season.. I hate this argument of "make them work under the championship cap for a season" We're already operating under that cap but the established 100+ year olds clubs that are run by PRLP can't afford to be anything but PT. Is the RFL going to pay the contracts off that were signed before these new cap rules came into place? The crab bucket mentality is real.

I think people have really loved that PVL brought up the Aussies in London numbers so we can again go over it for the 200th time on this forum.

How much is this going to cost the RFL, £500k ?

It feels strange to talk about this upcoming WC with people when the answer to if they can watch any is "no, unless you want to pay for Premier"

You clearly don't do much social media if you don't think there is any anti-London feelings about their entry to SL. Go to any comment section of any post that mentions London and you'll get "40 years of the RFL pumping money into London for nothing, while they neglect the heartlands"

I've already said in gradings Barrow "are better placed" to be promoted but in reality they are not. That isn't in my head that is what Barrow has literally said.

Why aren't they, when should they be announced? Assuming we have them in place.

But it isn't really an alternative, the games are played in the early hours of the morning

SL hasn't announced a title sponsor or a TV deal for next season. It is all a joke.

They'll all be watching next week.

Barrow has literally said they do not want to be promoted to Super League, perhaps that is the opinion you should base it off.

"Better placed" according to the gradings. But not in reality.

Barrow have said they are not ready for Super League. They had to beg to pay for a bus this year.

You clearly don't read much social media then

Yes but it's all based off assumptions not known facts

So we "certainly" don't know then

How do we?

If only we had Unions profile

Don't worry, all London friends on here are well aware of Featherstone after breaking their hearts while they broke their bank account.

Oh right, that doesn't affect football as a sport whatsoever.

I personally don't agree with that - you are handing out lesser punishments just because they are committing them at a higher level, we have had incidents in games that deserve long bans.

You should just ignore him. He comes from a country that's massive while most people wouldn't even be able to name their capital, it is what it is.

Huh?

But what do you do if it's serious foul play at international level? You can't not punish a player because it would rule him out for a year at international level

With our international schedule being as awful as it is, a player hit with a 3/4 match ban when playing internationally could be banned from playing for their country for 1-2 years before those 3/4 games happen.