mattcasfan

Its quite clearly on page 12 of the handbook. Interesting r.e. their POT though. Also interesting that Leeds aren't in the top 7 most viewed clubs. Dispels the myth that many people peddle that they are in the top 2 for viewership.

Population has gone

Which would be the worst of both worlds from a sporting competition stand point in the traditional sense.

Bradford weren't an A and won't be this year either. If their ground was located in a WF postcode they would have only scored 13.81 last year and been a way of an A grade. Not that A B or C matters a jot in reality. Fortunately, the whole thing seems like it could be entering its final days.

Err. Pretty good Wakey probably vault up to around 5th/6th overall. Win the GF and could well end up top 4 with the bonus points for winning it plus drops for other clubs..notably Hull KR.

Bradford have confirmed that they are going to lose points this year (obviously for anyone still bothering to pay attention to this nonsense). Could we all just imagine for a moment if they did somehow drop out of the top 14 despite booking a trip to Vegas...ust for the chuckles Fortunately for them the teams that would be looking to catch them (TO and York) also lose the full catchment points. Cas and Hudds automatically vault over them. Seems like the Bulls will be 12th and just make the cut if it was still a 12 team league. Someone also queried what London got on catchment earlier - that was 1 point. Unless they made an agreement with another local authority ala Hull FC but nobody knows if that was the case or not.

Just the 1.5 points for the facilities score. Slide 27 of the handbook

I was replying to his comment that their score will go up at Dewsbury....where you then told him to give it a rest. He is correct. Their score will go up at Dewsbury due to now obtaining POT points. Although I think his assertion that their score will go up due to utilisation is actually wrong for this year. That metric is backwards looking over the last 2 years so this year will be calculated across their attendances at the Accu. Next year it will go up as it will be 1 year at the Accu and 1 at Dewsbury. Then it will improve further the year after when 2 full seasons have been completed in Dewburys stadium.

2 years as of now. Cas managed to get WR up to meet the criteria for the 1.5 stadium points in 12 months and thats without Davy's 10m investment. Pretty sure they will manage it in the 2 years grace period before they ever score only 0.5 for playing out of Dewsbury. The RFL should never have signed this off but with the flimsy way the rules were written they probably had no choice but to grant it. Blame those who made up the rules in the first place (oh wait that is also the RFL).

Cas are pretty much the only club that didn't previously inflate announced attendances by adding on sold tickets. (Until it seems this year I might add)

No. That's a separate form filled out after the match. You only have to look at Saints' averages being announced as 11K but the info in their accounts stating their real attendances (based off said reports) are 9K.

Plus presumably the 0.25 points for Primacy of Tenure that they didn't have at the Accu. Rimmer was correct that moving to Dewsbury (and purchasing it) would lead to their facilities pillar score increasing.

He's correct though.

That's absolutely not the case. Clubs can announce what they want (as the vast majority have for years). What counts for IMG purposes is the figure that goes on the ground safety report for each game.

You asked me what was inaccurate. I told you what was inaccurate. Get the details right. It's really that simple. What you said is still wrong by the way. Club A would score 3/3.5 Club B would score 2.3/3.5