Martyn Sadler Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 I was listening to a Radio 5Live interview with Paul Gambaccini earlier today. I think he has a right to feel very angry. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/11865678/Paul-Gambaccini-Historic-sex-investigations-are-based-on-rumour-and-accusation-rather-than-evidence.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Futtocks Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 He got caught up in the media storm and got hurt by it. His reaction is,if anything, quite mild. Mind you, I still can't forgive him for his intrusive voiceover on the Leon Russell DVD. Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted. Ralph Waldo Emerson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mumby Magic Posted September 15, 2015 Share Posted September 15, 2015 It's a very awkward but intriguing subject all the same. William Roche, Michael le Vell, Jim Davidson and Paul Gambo are looked at as innocent completely as they have been investigated and cleared within breathing distance of the Operation Yew Tree Investigations and people now do look on them as innocent. However Pete Townsend, Michael Barrymore and Matthew Kelly are continuously looked down upon, believed to be guilty by the public or in Barrymore's case had a career ruined despite all being classed as innocent or no case to answer. If I was cleared of these things and innocent I'd be narked off too. Like poor jokes? Thejoketeller@mullymessiah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.