ROOSTER1980 Posted December 1, 2015 Share Posted December 1, 2015 Just a reminder for all NCL Clubs to make sure their voting slips for the re-election of Eastmoor, plus the acceptance or otherwise of Ryland Sharks and Castleford Panthers - together with the vote on the acceptance or otherwise of DUAL REGISTRATION - are sent in to the RFL by the end of play tomorrow. We can't run our own league if people don't want to vote on things that will affect us all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 1, 2015 Share Posted December 1, 2015 Anyone have any ideas on how their clubs have voted on D R , the Cumbrian clubs have voted against apparently, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTER1980 Posted December 1, 2015 Author Share Posted December 1, 2015 Salford City Roosters have voted against dual registration. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted December 2, 2015 Share Posted December 2, 2015 Has anyone actually voted in favour or will they not say? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flatcap Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Acorn voted against Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender1 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Rumour has it most if not all Hull clubs have gone against it, so up to now no takers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybison Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Hunslet Warriors voted against. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AC3 Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Underbank also voted against I believe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowes Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 Guessing it won't happen and Championship clubs will need to resurrect their reserves Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Celtic Rooster Posted December 5, 2015 Share Posted December 5, 2015 Which championship clubs do you think will be able to afford to resurrect their reserve teams then? My guess is none. This is Rugby League Bowes - all the money goes to Super League to pay for Aussie recruits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
henage Posted December 5, 2015 Share Posted December 5, 2015 Mostly second rate Aussie recruits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 It looks like its been a disappointment for the rfl With so many clubs voting against the D R between amateur and championships clubs, if it had been successful it would have been announced by now, think they will be plotting how to sneak it through, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casyorkie Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Results in 26 for 20 against looks like clubs who voted yes choose not to announce on here their vote. For some reason thou this vote will not count and the NCL have decided another vote will happen at the AGM. Im sure someone at the NCL can explain what the point of this first was for then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender1 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Results in 26 for 20 against looks like clubs who voted yes choose not to announce on here their vote. For some reason thou this vote will not count and the NCL have decided another vote will happen at the AGM. Im sure someone at the NCL can explain what the point of this first was for then. You find it hard to believe as everyone seemed against Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROOSTER1980 Posted December 7, 2015 Author Share Posted December 7, 2015 Bear in mind that the 'yes' votes included Clubs who couldn't be bothered to put a vote in. There were a number of clubs who chose not to bother In my opinion a show-of-hands vote at the AGM is a much fairer way to handle this very important issue. Also bear in mind that the vote will need a 2/3rds majority to go through. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender1 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Bear in mind that the 'yes' votes included Clubs who couldn't be bothered to put a vote in. There were a number of clubs who chose not to bother In my opinion a show-of-hands vote at the AGM is a much fairer way to handle this very important issue. Also bear in mind that the vote will need a 2/3rds majority to go through. Thanks I did not know that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
casyorkie Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Bear in mind that the 'yes' votes included Clubs who couldn't be bothered to put a vote in. There were a number of clubs who chose not to bother In my opinion a show-of-hands vote at the AGM is a much fairer way to handle this very important issue. Also bear in mind that the vote will need a 2/3rds majority to go through. I agree vote at the AGM, it wont be hand thou it will be on slips like other votes. But why bother with this vote in the first place. Think about the reaction on here if the vote was 20 for and 26 against and the NCL said we will have another vote at the AGM I cant think many clubs will not have voted I thought there was a fine if the club did not vote. How many choose not to vote Rooster and a real shame if clubs cant be bothered to vote. If it needs a 2/3rds majority to be accepted then this vote overall says it should not carry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Fully agree, but how many rfl stool pigeons have influence and also involved with a NCL teams, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaxiEgg Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 It all a bit messy to me yet another confusing issue thrown into the mix . It's about time the community game was left to the community game . The RFL should just be there to support the community game when needed not to re shape the game against our best wishes . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxwel Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Miners voted against dual reg Its nice to be important, but never forget its important to be nice!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender1 Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Out of the 20 that voted against most have aired their view, of the 26 who voted for will they give their reason why and sell the Benefits Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gillmeister Posted December 7, 2015 Share Posted December 7, 2015 Clubs with a lot of players on the fringes at pro clubs id imagine defender, We always vote on whats best for our club not the whole of the game Forget Chuck and Chad I am the real legend killer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Defender1 Posted December 8, 2015 Share Posted December 8, 2015 Clubs with a lot of players on the fringes at pro clubs id imagine defender, We always vote on whats best for our club not the whole of the game Thanks for that, as has been said before "players from the original club" not necessarily means where they signed pro from, in Hull no Championship clubs and Super League players are not included It's not a level playing field, woolly again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowes Posted December 8, 2015 Share Posted December 8, 2015 Thanks for that, as has been said before "players from the original club" not necessarily means where they signed pro from, in Hull no Championship clubs and Super League players are not included It's not a level playing field, woolly again I don't see the original club rule as workable. A limit of 3 per club makes sense though, if clubs vote this in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barbara henderson Posted December 8, 2015 Share Posted December 8, 2015 It will be interesting to see if the NCL use the '2/3rds majority rule' at the next meeting, knowing that going off initial figures the DR rule would not be adopted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.