Dessie O'Hare Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 The next dicipline is 31st October (one of my lads is up !) So a while yet until the true position is known. Every other club this season has lost 2 points for this offence so it does not look good for Oulton. I will have a bet with anybody, Hunslet Warriors are going down. The last 2 sides charged with Rule 4.2 received a warning, a suspended fine and no points deduction. Any takers for the bet? "There are only 5 functions of Internet FORUMS. . . . . . . . Brag . . Patronise . . Wind-up . . Fawn . . Threaten. . . . . . . Which one did you perform? " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybison Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Stanley were charged under OR 4.2 and were deducted 2 league points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dessie O'Hare Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Stanley were charged under OR 4.2 and were deducted 2 league points. No, you're wrong. Stanley were charged under CR 4.13 and 4.14 "There are only 5 functions of Internet FORUMS. . . . . . . . Brag . . Patronise . . Wind-up . . Fawn . . Threaten. . . . . . . Which one did you perform? " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6brackendale Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Dessie - no way would I take the bet I'm sure you will be right ! I thought it was the same charge as Stanley - apologies. What is the difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybison Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 No, you're wrong. Stanley were charged under CR 4.13 and 4.14 Just read the discipline minutes 30th august 2016 on the NCL website again, it does read that Stanley were charged under CR 4.2 and Lock Lane and Dewsbury Celtic were charged under CR 4.13 and CR 4.14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hunsletgreenandgold Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 I will have a bet with anybody, Hunslet Warriors are going down. The last 2 sides charged with Rule 4.2 received a warning, a suspended fine and no points deduction. Any takers for the bet? But how do you know it's definitely Rule/Section 4.2 they're going to be charged with? Seemingly on the face of it Stanley's was the same rule Breach but they were sanctioned differently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatman Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Just read the discipline minutes 30th august 2016 on the NCL website again, it does read that Stanley were charged under CR 4.2 and Lock Lane and Dewsbury Celtic were charged under CR 4.13 and CR 4.14. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatman Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Stanley were charged with rule 4.13 and 4.14 case No NCL052 Hearing date 1st Aug The case was referred to the NCL management and then on the 30th August they were charged but it says rule 4.2 which I guess is a typing error and should have said rules 4.13 and 4.14 because rule 4.2 does not state that 2 league points will be deducted. At the hearing dated 7th October Oulton was charged with playing a unregistered player rule 4.2 this was adjourned so in my view I can not see Oulton getting 2 points deducted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatman Posted October 19, 2016 Share Posted October 19, 2016 Just read the rule 4.2 again and it refers to suspended players so not sure why at the dicisiplinery hearing it says unregistered player that should be rule 4.15 and that says if the team wins the games the player takes part then the league points will be taken away. so the plot thickens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billybison Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Stanley were charged with rule 4.13 and 4.14 case No NCL052 Hearing date 1st Aug The case was referred to the NCL management and then on the 30th August they were charged but it says rule 4.2 which I guess is a typing error and should have said rules 4.13 and 4.14 because rule 4.2 does not state that 2 league points will be deducted. At the hearing dated 7th October Oulton was charged with playing a unregistered player rule 4.2 this was adjourned so in my view I can not see Oulton getting 2 points deducted. My comments on this matter were based on what I had read on the NCL disciplinary minutes. so it does not look good for Hunslet Warriors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vatman Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 No it does not look good for Warriors. I would have thougt if the NCL was going to deduct any points they would have held the hearing prior to the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saddleworth Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 Ah of course I was forgetting Castleford Panthers dropping out. Again!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loiner Posted October 29, 2016 Share Posted October 29, 2016 I will have a bet with anybody, Hunslet Warriors are going down. The last 2 sides charged with Rule 4.2 received a warning, a suspended fine and no points deduction. Any takers for the bet? Plus the NCL don't like the Hunslet warriors for past misdemeanours. Like foolishly trying to take them to court. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6brackendale Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Oulton have been deducted 2 points at last night's hearing - to be confirmed by management. What a mess this is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDuke Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Thankfully Skirlaugh managed to get promoted, but when they had 2 points docked the league acted very differently to this stating due to the closeness at the top of the league an immediate deduction was to be implemented, I feel for clubs in this situation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackbeard Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Do Oulton get chance to contest this or is that 100% official...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6brackendale Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 Totally agree we at Shaw Cross just managed to avoid relegation - what a terrible position for these two clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6brackendale Posted November 1, 2016 Share Posted November 1, 2016 On the list it says no right to appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.