Jump to content

Luke Gale


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Oliver Clothesoff said:

Utterly bizarre reason to flout the rules. We have a cap and all teams should stick to it, injuries or not. Can’t remember Saints crying last year about Walmsley, Leeds moaning about the loss of Hall etc

Spose an alternative would be Wigan esq approach to flout the cap by simply knowingly breaching it. 

Hall and Walmsley both played last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, scotchy1 said:

I would assume if it was some known issue that kept a player out for multiple seasons i could imagine it being necessary. Or if there is some kind of disaster (god forbid) like a coach crash etc.

The thing is I dont necessarily disagree with the idea of there being some sort of dispensation for long term injuries but this seems a kind of arbitrary way of going about it. Did Wigan get dispensation for Manfredi? Gale will miss probably 8 or 9 months minimum of RL but players have suffered worse injuries spreading of two seasons that would mean they miss a longer period of time. Are they able to claim dispensation for that.

I cant really see whats different about this example that makes it different enough from many others.

To be honest I think Gale will be done for the season.  I'd assume any dispensation would be conditional to his wage only been except if he doesn't play this season.

I don't really have a strong opinion either way to be honest.  Bout time Cas had some luck with injuries though!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, scotchy1 said:

Yeah Im a bit undecided about it. I wouldnt really have a problem with Cas getting dispensation but if they do there needs to be a overhaul of the Cap to take in to account injuries because there is a question of fairness and the arbitrary nature of it.

Agree any dispensation would have to be transparent and available in the same circs.

The other thing I would say is Wells doesn't actually specify the grounds they would apply for a dispensation on. 

The actual cap various from club to club (Marque players, up to 100k for producing players, 15k player Welfare).  I doubt Cas are maximising these  in the same way clubs like Wigan, Saints and Wire are. The dispensation could simply be to apply for the max 115k and apply to move Shenton to a Marque player, removing some of his wages.  (I would assume you have to make a formal application for any of these dispensations).

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the NFL... And other sports... They have an Injured Reserve rule.

If they have a serious Injury they can be taken off the roster and temporarily replaced.  But they cannot play for the rest of the season (I think). 

I had not aware that e.g. Manfredi was taken off the cap. There has been no formal rule on taking injured players off the cap has there, and many players have been on long injury absences recently. 

So to me, Cas are stuck with it.  But if it's thought there should be some proper rule then it should be agreed by the league, not a convenient quick fix. The league should meet and work out a rule and bring it in the next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned, if Cas don't get dispensation, there are still avenues open.

We don't have a marquee player, so one option would be to use that (I'm not sure how though - as someone mentioned we could move a current player to marquee status to free up some cap perhaps).

Even if we don't do anything, I think we'll be OK. We played most of last season without Gale and still finished 3rd. Between them, Ellis, Roberts and McShane should be able to cover for him. And it gives young Aston as chance to prove himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This opens up a real can of worms with the potential for clubs to find ways round the cap unless the rule change is throughly thought through, debated and agreed across clubs and the RFL.

So not against this change in principal, I just think the RFL shouldn't rush into making a change to suit Cas now before the season starts

St.Helens - The Home of record breaking Rugby Champions

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Saint Toppy said:

This opens up a real can of worms with the potential for clubs to find ways round the cap unless the rule change is throughly thought through, debated and agreed across clubs and the RFL.

So not against this change in principal, I just think the RFL shouldn't rush into making a change to suit Cas now before the season starts

It is already in the Salary Cap regulations that Cas can apply for a dispensation due to injury. It doesn't give any more detail than that, and I think it is considered on a case by case basis. 

It is on the RFL website, but the doc wont allow me to copy and paste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Dave T said:

It is already in the Salary Cap regulations that Cas can apply for a dispensation due to injury. It doesn't give any more detail than that, and I think it is considered on a case by case basis. 

It is on the RFL website, but the doc wont allow me to copy and paste.

I am not sure that it should be on a case by case basis.  There have been a number of high profile players who were injured on a long time basis. As far as I know none were given Cap dispensation, and of course some clubs might have been well under the Cap anyway.  And if there were some "quiet" dispensation, why are Cas now making an issue of it?

Gale was injured and did play at end of last season. Its not as if he was still out without a gap since he was first injured last year.

I do believe that some sort of clear Injured Reserve rule would be fair, but properly introduced in good timely fashion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rupert Prince said:

I am not sure that it should be on a case by case basis.  There have been a number of high profile players who were injured on a long time basis. As far as I know none were given Cap dispensation, and of course some clubs might have been well under the Cap anyway.  And if there were some "quiet" dispensation, why are Cas now making an issue of it?

Gale was injured and did play at end of last season. Its not as if he was still out without a gap since he was first injured last year.

I do believe that some sort of clear Injured Reserve rule would be fair, but properly introduced in good timely fashion.

I'm not sure it should be either, I made that assumption simply on the basis that they don't state a set period of time.

I understand if dispensation was given for a player being out all season, but what if he returns in the minimum and then a player would have to sit on the sidelines for a fair chunk of the season (July onwards) despite being fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Oliver Clothesoff said:

Utterly bizarre reason to flout the rules. We have a cap and all teams should stick to it, injuries or not. Can’t remember Saints crying last year about Walmsley, Leeds moaning about the loss of Hall etc

How exactly is it flouting the rules if they have asked the RFL if they can do it within the salary cap rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Dave T said:

I'm not sure it should be either, I made that assumption simply on the basis that they don't state a set period of time.

I understand if dispensation was given for a player being out all season, but what if he returns in the minimum and then a player would have to sit on the sidelines for a fair chunk of the season (July onwards) despite being fit.

That possibility would have to be taken into account when the club applied for dispensation. If he does come back to fitness they will have to loan him out somewhere.

Otherwise I think it is perfectly reasonable for Cas to apply for and receive dispensation given the season doesn't start for another month.

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Rupert Prince said:

I am not sure that it should be on a case by case basis.  There have been a number of high profile players who were injured on a long time basis. As far as I know none were given Cap dispensation, and of course some clubs might have been well under the Cap anyway.  And if there were some "quiet" dispensation, why are Cas now making an issue of it?

Gale was injured and did play at end of last season. Its not as if he was still out without a gap since he was first injured last year.

I do believe that some sort of clear Injured Reserve rule would be fair, but properly introduced in good timely fashion.

Gale played in the Semi final.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's an interesting point...

I do feel for Gale and hope he has a speedy, full recovery.

However, I shudder when I hear of anything "special" to do with Rugby League, as it invariably will be a mish-mosh and cause consternation with other clubs etc.

My understanding is he had missed the internationals as he had to have surgery as his knee had not healed properly.  He was likely to miss a month or 2 of the start of the season (quote from Jon Wells " Gale missed four months of the 2018 season with a broken kneecap and, although he made his comeback during the play-offs, he was forced to miss England's Test series against New Zealand in order to undergo further surgery, which would have forced him to sit out the first month of the new campaign."), so he wasn't expected to play a full season anyway...

I'm no fan of the Salary Cap, but get the feeling, it's becoming a term rather than a practice!

I'd have thought that by deregistering Gale, to get him off cap and then register another player, would do the job, although it would free him up to be signed elsewhere?  That to me would be the way to do it without any "special dispensation"?

Cas run the risk of him being poached, but c'est la vie!

If anyone has a link to the current Salary Cap rules it might help?

I just see this being very messy!

Money can't buy you happiness!

It can buy you beer and that's a bit like happiness in a glass!

"I like pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals."

Sir Winston Churchill

Some folks are wise and some are otherwise!

Tobias Smollett

"I distrust camels, and anyone else who can go a week without a drink."

Joe E Lewis

"Look at the ffing state of that"!

My mate on the Avenue last Friday whilst pointing to a scantily clad young lady and spitting a mouthful of beer out!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good Lord - Cas have done nothing wrong as it is in the rules....anyway.....we still need to find some money form somewhere to "replace" him which I'm not particularly confident is there

Now then, it's a race between Sandie....and Fairburn....and the little man is in........yeees he's in.

I, just like those Castleford supporters felt that the ball should have gone to David Plange but he put the bit betwen his teeth...and it was a try

Kevin Ward - best player I have ever seen

DSC04156_edited-1_thumb.jpg

The real Mick Gledhill is what you see on here, a Bradford fan ........, but deep down knows that Bradford are just not good enough to challenge the likes of Leeds & St Helens.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Kenilworth Tiger said:

Good Lord - Cas have done nothing wrong as it is in the rules....anyway.....we still need to find some money form somewhere to "replace" him which I'm not particularly confident is there

Car have not done anything, because they have not done anything!  And if you do not ask you do not get.  There is not, it seems to be, a "rule" in the first place. Just an ad hoc arrangement.

The issue should be that the rule or procedure should be regularised.  And the principle should be that the player should be taken off the rota for the remainder of the season.

The other item of note is that Cas are already up to their cap limit. Some expensive players out there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow - some people getting incredibly irate over something that may or may not happen

 

What a time to be alive

Now then, it's a race between Sandie....and Fairburn....and the little man is in........yeees he's in.

I, just like those Castleford supporters felt that the ball should have gone to David Plange but he put the bit betwen his teeth...and it was a try

Kevin Ward - best player I have ever seen

DSC04156_edited-1_thumb.jpg

The real Mick Gledhill is what you see on here, a Bradford fan ........, but deep down knows that Bradford are just not good enough to challenge the likes of Leeds & St Helens.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Rupert Prince said:

 

The other item of note is that Cas are already up to their cap limit. Some expensive players out there

Yet Cas still probably spent a couple of 100k a year less than the teams they completed with to finish in the top 4 last year.  Are the Cas players the expensive ones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Gates1 said:

Yet Cas still probably spent a couple of 100k a year less than the teams they completed with to finish in the top 4 last year.  Are the Cas players the expensive ones?

Yes, my logic is flawed. The wisdom of filling up the Cap is another whole thread perhaps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.