Crown Flatter Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 I see this match as simply being a sort out for Lee Greenwood to find his starting line-up for the Rochdale fixture, so am guessing there might be a large number of substitutions to aid his choice. Shame I will miss this game as I will be at the panto in Bradford! York 36-18 Dewsbury FTS: Worrincy MoM: Knowles Att: 1101 Legs, Dews, Legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NickD Posted January 18, 2019 Share Posted January 18, 2019 58 minutes ago, Crown Flatter said: I see this match as simply being a sort out for Lee Greenwood to find his starting line-up for the Rochdale fixture, so am guessing there might be a large number of substitutions to aid his choice. Shame I will miss this game as I will be at the panto in Bradford! York 36-18 Dewsbury FTS: Worrincy MoM: Knowles Att: 1101 Id prefer to see his preferred 17 getting a run out prior to Rochdale so fingers crossed you're wrong abut the substitutions... I will miss the game cos its p*** poor time to play a rugby match.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham fisher Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 Looking at our team for tonight’s game I can see a hammering,sorry to sound so negative. Anyway we’ll see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
9' oller Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 They certainly have the personnel to hold their own 'Shaw cross juniors, Birkenshaw, Mirfield, Heckmondwike Panthers, Stainland Stags and then the Heavy woolen donkeys... WARDY, STOZZA, GT, KARL OR KEAR MUST OF DROPPED A DIGIT FROM MY MOBILE NUMBER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishknight Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 10. nil after 25 minutes to York, Tenby having a stormer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishknight Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 3 minutes ago, spanishknight said: 10. nil after 25 minutes to York, Teanby having a stormer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham fisher Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 21 minutes ago, 9' oller said: They certainly have the personnel to hold their own Last chance for a few of these players tonight. Lee probably doesn’t want to give too much away with his selection as we play York 2nd game in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham fisher Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 5 minutes ago, spanishknight said: 10. nil after 25 minutes to York, Tenby having a stormer. Good lad is Jack Teanby,good forward who’ll go well for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishknight Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 14 . 0 at H.T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishknight Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 20 . 0 just after ht. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishknight Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 Latest score 30 . 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spanishknight Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 34 . 0 F.T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamesb0551 Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 Poor result but it’s only a friendly that will be soon forgotten if we beat Rochdale www.dewsburyramstv.co.uk - free highlights service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham fisher Posted January 19, 2019 Share Posted January 19, 2019 2 hours ago, graham fisher said: Looking at our team for tonight’s game I can see a hammering,sorry to sound so negative. Anyway we’ll see. Just what I expected when I saw our team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ANDYPK Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 How far off your first choice 17 was this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crown Flatter Posted January 20, 2019 Author Share Posted January 20, 2019 As we have so many new faces this year it is difficult to know, but I would suggest only about 8 first choice players took to the field today. Legs, Dews, Legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wakefield Ram Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Something between 6-8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashbourneknight Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 Great display by the Knights, the score could well of swelled by couple of close calls and a few missed conversations, in all both teams are going through their pre season matches with there own mix and match of players, but as far as the Knights are in preparation it looks from there pre match results that we are going in the right direction, the quality of the knights rugby is very exciting and definetly work in progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
graham fisher Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 12 hours ago, ANDYPK said: How far off your first choice 17 was this? I reckon these players would be in the 17. Morton A Brown Ryder Leeming S Brown Sykes Andrade Ward Knowles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the old nine ole Posted January 20, 2019 Share Posted January 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, graham fisher said: I reckon these players would be in the 17. Morton A Brown Ryder Leeming S Brown Sykes Andrade Ward Knowles. For me our team depends on Sykes, Knowles, Ryder, Morton .... and I think possibly Andrade!! ... with these 5 we will be competitive without them we probably wont!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Batley Bob Posted January 25, 2019 Share Posted January 25, 2019 https://www.thepressnews.co.uk/sportsnews/some-rams-not-at-championship-level- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.