Lowdesert Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Posted Sky as the HDM is too full of ads. I thought Hudgell was part of the judiciary panel? https://www.skysports.com/rugby-league/news/12217/11730857/rfl-defends-judicial-system-after-hull-kr-owner-neil-hudgells-criticism Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deluded pom? Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 He's a naughty boy calling Cullen's impartiality into question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RLDave Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Ah, that's what happened to Cullen! @ohcallicalli You can't beat an owl! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Vet Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Support a Championship/League 1 team, that’s a real eye opener on some of the disciplinary decisions! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 I'm also wondering how Matt Parcell could be up twice for 'deliberate or reckless contact with a match official' during one game but only get 1 match for each? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowdesert Posted May 29, 2019 Author Share Posted May 29, 2019 41 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said: I'm also wondering how Matt Parcell could be up twice for 'deliberate or reckless contact with a match official' during one game but only get 1 match for each? I think Scott Taylor got a similar punishment. 2 offences, 1 match for each. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wakefield Ram Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Made me laugh that the game Tomkin's will miss is against Warrington. No conflict of interest from the ex-Warrington player and coach Paul Cullen. He should have recused himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bearman Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 2 hours ago, The Vet said: Support a Championship/League 1 team, that’s a real eye opener on some of the disciplinary decisions! The RFL have repealed the death penalty for Barrow players that are brought to them Ron Banks Midlands Hurricanes and Barrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave T Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 9 minutes ago, Wakefield Ram said: Made me laugh that the game Tomkin's will miss is against Warrington. No conflict of interest from the ex-Warrington player and coach Paul Cullen. He should have recused himself. They use ex-players all the time. They often judge on cases involving their ex clubs. The system would break down if we had to find people with no history. If the RFL don't come down hard on Hudgell for questioning the integrity of the disciplinary then we may as well give up. That kind of paranoid nonsense is for us fans! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxford Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 9 minutes ago, Dave T said: That kind of paranoid nonsense is for us fans! Yeah, we need a fans' union or a injuction against people who steal our intellectual property! 2 warning points Non-Political Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Does anyone have the link to where Hudgell complained about the pathetically low ban Tomkins got for abusing a referee earlier this season? I'm struggling to find a link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Clothesoff Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 Won’t be long before Super League do their own judiciary stuff then... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooleboy Posted May 29, 2019 Share Posted May 29, 2019 27 minutes ago, Oliver Clothesoff said: Won’t be long before Super League do their own judiciary stuff then... Well he is one of these very knowledgeable go forward Chairmen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave T Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 It is interesting how his chum Carter supported him on Twitter, but both were at pains to explain the system was fine (because they were both involved) but it was the people involved. Classless guff from both of them. I think this is a really serious allegation from him that has to be taken further by the RFL, but I fear they are frightened to death of upsetting the SL bosses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 1 minute ago, Dave T said: It is interesting how his chum Carter supported him on Twitter, but both were at pains to explain the system was fine (because they were both involved) but it was the people involved. Classless guff from both of them. I think this is a really serious allegation from him that has to be taken further by the RFL, but I fear they are frightened to death of upsetting the SL bosses. I agree. It is a test for the RFL and whether they can stand up for the integrity of the sport Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooleboy Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 1 minute ago, LeeF said: I agree. It is a test for the RFL and whether they can stand up for the integrity of the sport Wonder if he would be as bothered about a one match ban for Tomkins if they were playing a League 1 team this weekend in the Cup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeF Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 20 minutes ago, Gooleboy said: Wonder if he would be as bothered about a one match ban for Tomkins if they were playing a League 1 team this weekend in the Cup? Warrington probably didn't want him banning as he is a penalty machine and therefore likely to be an asset for them this weekend Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave T Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 It is interesting that Tomkins already has two bans this year, they were listed on the file as aggravating factors, but he still received the lower end punishment of 1 match for this incident. Reading the file is interesting, Hudgell is clearly peeved because his legal arguments didn't lead to a victory here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deluded pom? Posted May 30, 2019 Share Posted May 30, 2019 3 hours ago, Dave T said: Hudgell is clearly peeved because his legal arguments didn't lead to a victory here. Maybe not but if you ever get a paper cut at work Dave, Hudgell's your man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oliver Clothesoff Posted June 1, 2019 Share Posted June 1, 2019 On 30/05/2019 at 08:33, LeeF said: Warrington probably didn't want him banning as he is a penalty machine and therefore likely to be an asset for them this weekend Ever played prop? No? Well shut up then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ckn Posted June 1, 2019 Share Posted June 1, 2019 43 minutes ago, Oliver Clothesoff said: Ever played prop? No? Well shut up then. 30 day suspension and final warning. This is your second suspension, hence the public version and the very lengthy one. "When in deadly danger, when beset by doubt; run in little circles, wave your arms and shout" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.