Sat 12 Oct: SLGF: Salford Red Devils v St Helens KO 6pm (TV)

[johnh1 815]

Er....Lolohea. Fages was offside and you can see quite clearly that his defensive effort was taken up watching him which created the gap elsewhere.

[johnh1 815]

6 hours ago, hullste said:

There was no interference with the defensive line, Roby(back of the pack) moved in front of him to play him onside, he never stood in the defensive line unlike Tomkins. You need to jog on pal

Sorry for having an opinion different to yours, ‘pal’.Fages ran across and in front of the defensive line in an offside position. 

[hullste 50]

On 20/10/2019 at 03:12, johnh1 said:

Sorry for having an opinion different to yours, ‘pal’.Fages ran across and in front of the defensive line in an offside position. 

Unfortunately for you both the referee and the video referee agreed with me. Nevermind hopefully you won't have to wait too long before you reach another final. 

[Dave T 13,397]

On 19/10/2019 at 20:02, johnh1 said:

Fages was offside and interfering with the Salford defensive line. That is obstruction. I really cannot see how anyone can disagree with that. It resulted in the try that ‘won’ the game for Saints. There was no coming back from that. If Saints fans are happy with that, especially McManus, then that’s fine.

It isn't obstruction John. He was offside. And interfering with play so it should have been pulled. Offside, not obstruction.

[Dave T 13,397]

On 19/10/2019 at 20:02, johnh1 said:

Fages was offside and interfering with the Salford defensive line. That is obstruction. I really cannot see how anyone can disagree with that. It resulted in the try that ‘won’ the game for Saints. There was no coming back from that. If Saints fans are happy with that, especially McManus, then that’s fine.

It isn't obstruction John. He was offside. And interfering with play so it should have been pulled. Offside, not obstruction.