Jump to content

Wayne Bennetts future decided on several issues


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, scotchy1 said:

We have good players, but not enough.

And not on certain positions. 

Next year should have been all out for the first ashes victory in decades providing a huge boost for the 2021 WC. 

As it is we dont have any halves, any centres, nobody really demanding the fullback shirt, a few options at hooker but our best option is still roby and he is an old man now.

We have no centres worthy of consideration. Only the hope a full off season gets Watkins back to his best.

We have no SL produced halves who can do it either, we have to hope Widdop takes a huge step forward which at his age is unlikely and Gale who hasnt played in 2 years comes back better than he has every been. Outside of that we are scratching around.

And it's not that we aren't good enough now and we are a building side, we are in a win-now position and losing. 

Our great young Hopes, the likes of Smithies, walker, newman, trueman, Lees cant all be dumped in at once. 

 

Depth is a problem yes.

Widdop was the best half in the NRL 2 years ago, he's been injured most of the season and hasn't had much to work with this year. We've struggled for centres for a while now and I think Watkins, who was our only world class centre, is done now. Our best bet there is that Percival kicks on a notch along with Connor and Gildart. I don't think those 3 are far off being good international players. I mean Connor and Gildart looked very good last year and Percival has been unlucky with opportunities at international level so it's not a lost cause.

If you look a little further back we had some good centres in Keith Senior and Martin Gleeson with decent players like Yeaman as back-up. We were not overly blessed with dummy halves or wingers at the time. The game where we won in Australia we had Gaz Raynor on the wing and I think Lee Gilmore was filling in on the other at some point (both scored mind). We produce good players but not always in the same positions, there is a little bit of pot luck to it. Full back has been a problem since the role changed though, whereas we seem to produce a lot of good front and back rowers.

At our current rate of producing players and the environment they develop in, it feels like we have between 1 and 3 good players for each position, and by that I include positions where you have 2 of them e.g. we may only have one good winger for 2 wing spots. I dont think that will change anytime soon given the changes that would be needed in increasing participation and development. Our best hope is to get more kids in the NRL system like Herbie Farnsworth plus more players from all positions in the NRL in general.

Formerly Alistair Boyd-Meaney

fifty thousand Poouunds from Keighley...weve had im gid."

3736-mipm.gif

MIPM Project Management and Business Solutions "

Discounts available for forum members contact me for details

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 84
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Anyone who saw Souths this season will realise he's hellbent on the turgid style. He's relied of individual excellence with big forwards and Cook out of dummy half with Reynolds kicking game and Walker's flashes of brilliance.

His style has ultimately been found out this year though, without Inglis, and the Burgess brothers below their best, they haven't had as dominant pack and that has limited their ability. I think they will decline further next year too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scotchy1 said:

I dont disagree with a lot of it, but that is bad. It's not enough, it's not enough to win an ashes series or world cup. 

Its not even enough to be the third best team in the world anymore.

It's not that we are getting worse, we arent, it's that the NRL and by virtue of that the southern hemisphere are getting better at such a faster rate than we are we. 

And those young players we hope kick on, arent young. They are mid-career at best. Jake Connor and mark percival are 25, how many backs take that step up at 25? 

I don't think Jake Connor and Mark Percival are far off. Connor was great last season but hasn't been quite as good this year and Percival hasn't had much of a chance to prove he is international class. Two great examples of players I think would improve a great deal if they went to the NRL. We beat NZ fairly convincingly last year. It doesn't hurt the sport if teams beat each other at the elite level. NZ were better this year for a number of reasons but it's not like those horrible late turn of the century years when we would get pumped by 70. That was a problem.

I think we're just about where you'd expect. challenging to be 2nd best team with the off chance of beating the only team with the depth and resources to be consistently number one now and again if everything falls into place for a brief period.

Formerly Alistair Boyd-Meaney

fifty thousand Poouunds from Keighley...weve had im gid."

3736-mipm.gif

MIPM Project Management and Business Solutions "

Discounts available for forum members contact me for details

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Denton Rovers RLFC said:

Irrelevant

irrelevant

Irrelevant

You are so wrong.

How can a club that has played Rugby League for over 120 years and playing in Super League not have an academy. What are they bring to Super League if not young players because they certainly don't bring fans.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/11/2019 at 09:47, The Future is League said:

Having plastic teams offers zero growth for Rugby League

Perhap's that should be taken into consideration when people champion Toronto, Ottawa, New York etc, with the best will in the world in the participation gains the game will see nothing at all for a very very long time even if ever at all from across the Atlantic, how else but 'plastic' can they be described.

The British Rugby League is actually standing on a precipice at the moment, decisions need to be taken to implement and improove participation levels very quickly, a step in the wrong direction or doing nothing at all will speed up an already declining sport to self- destruction, people can adopt the 'ostrich' effect if they wish but the problem ain't going to go away action needs taking, pinning hopes on establishing teams in North America to 'grow' the sport in that these teams can only depend on others to provide playing rosters is not the way to go and moreso especially if these teams replace established ones from our League being one's who actually can and do provide player's into the system. 

Now I know all the 'expansionists' are going to go off on one again, but it really isn't expansion is it, it is a drain on already depleting resources, now if the 'Toronto' and any other newcomers handout was put into grass roots over here plus a handsome levy for not developing player's that would be worthwhile, I would also say that teams over here who do not provide a pathway for talent should also be subjected to a reduction in their 'handout' and awarded to the grass roots as a means of assisting player development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

Perhap's that should be taken into consideration when people champion Toronto, Ottawa, New York etc, with the best will in the world in the participation gains the game will see nothing at all for a very very long time even if ever at all from across the Atlantic, how else but 'plastic' can they be described.

The British Rugby League is actually standing on a precipice at the moment, decisions need to be taken to implement and improove participation levels very quickly, a step in the wrong direction or doing nothing at all will speed up an already declining sport to self- destruction, people can adopt the 'ostrich' effect if they wish but the problem ain't going to go away action needs taking, pinning hopes on establishing teams in North America to 'grow' the sport in that these teams can only depend on others to provide playing rosters is not the way to go and moreso especially if these teams replace established ones from our League being one's who actually can and do provide player's into the system. 

Now I know all the 'expansionists' are going to go off on one again, but it really isn't expansion is it, it is a drain on already depleting resources, now if the 'Toronto' and any other newcomers handout was put into grass roots over here plus a handsome levy for not developing player's that would be worthwhile, I would also say that teams over here who do not provide a pathway for talent should also be subjected to a reduction in their 'handout' and awarded to the grass roots as a means of assisting player development.

How long have Toronto had a Rugby League team?

How many years has Rugby League been played in Ireland, Scotland and Wales?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, The Future is League said:

How long have Toronto had a Rugby League team?

How many years has Rugby League been played in Ireland, Scotland and Wales?

That has nothing to do with what I am getting at Future, I am saying the game is in crisis on the development side of it, North American teams will not alleviate the problem it will only exasperate it by it's dependency of using our already depleted player resources and not having the ability to add to the pool, and even moreso if NA teams replace clubs who do provide player's.

Simple question Future, how familiar are you with the Amatuer/Community side of our game, do you attend? have you witnessed how it has declined in the last 10 years in participating numbers in open age, youth and kids, it really is a massive problem that is getting worse each season, unless there is a concerted effort put in to address it the game in the UK will not carry on as we know it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Harry Stottle said:

That has nothing to do with what I am getting at Future, I am saying the game is in crisis on the development side of it, North American teams will not alleviate the problem it will only exasperate it by it's dependency of using our already depleted player resources and not having the ability to add to the pool, and even moreso if NA teams replace clubs who do provide player's.

Simple question Future, how familiar are you with the Amatuer/Community side of our game, do you attend? have you witnessed how it has declined in the last 10 years in participating numbers in open age, youth and kids, it really is a massive problem that is getting worse each season, unless there is a concerted effort put in to address it the game in the UK will not carry on as we know it.

It has everything to do with it.

OK I'm out of this debate now as you find it very hard to accept facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.