Oxford Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 3 minutes ago, North but south said: Surely you ask the governing body. Isn't that the purpose of having one? Ask the governing body do our clubs need the support of a well off owner? Mmmmmm 2 warning points Non-Political Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North but south Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 51 minutes ago, Oxford said: Ask the governing body do our clubs need the support of a well off owner? Mmmmmm That's the difference between having a good governing body looking out for the benefit of the game and one that's controlled by the clubs. I'm not saying no well of owners but take toronto, without argyle toronto would fold, they cant sustain their current spending and the amount of debt argyle must write off each year is more than some clubs spend in total. If toronto were limited to spend within a limit based on their finance the club would be able to continue whether argyle got bored and left or not. This system encourages clubs to sort themselves financial out getting rid of the mess at the end of last season with teams in that didn't even have enough registered players to put a team out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUBRATS Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 3 hours ago, North but south said: That's the difference between having a good governing body looking out for the benefit of the game and one that's controlled by the clubs. I'm not saying no well of owners but take toronto, without argyle toronto would fold, they cant sustain their current spending and the amount of debt argyle must write off each year is more than some clubs spend in total. If toronto were limited to spend within a limit based on their finance the club would be able to continue whether argyle got bored and left or not. This system encourages clubs to sort themselves financial out getting rid of the mess at the end of last season with teams in that didn't even have enough registered players to put a team out. Again what do you mean by ' their finance ' ? , So you mean as a business ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North but south Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 7 hours ago, GUBRATS said: Again what do you mean by ' their finance ' ? , So you mean as a business ? Do you know how ffp works in football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hela Wigmen Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Bodene Thompson gets away with a grub shot and gets 0 games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayakman Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said: Bodene Thompson gets away with a grub shot and gets 0 games. It clearly was accidental contact since the tackled player turned into him...that being said it was a blow to the head but probably really just a yellow, but I can see why a red was given....NOTHING MORE THOUGH THATS FOR SURE! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hela Wigmen Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 4 minutes ago, Kayakman said: It clearly was accidental contact since the tackled player turned into him...that being said it was a blow to the head but probably really just a yellow, but I can see why a red was given....NOTHING MORE THOUGH THATS FOR SURE! I would argue that it wasn’t accidental and the tackles player never turned into, more he was turned in to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrywebbisgod Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 31 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said: Bodene Thompson gets away with a grub shot and gets 0 games. But I've read on here that the RFL hate TWP,surely he should be sine die if that really is the case. Thank you for your valuable contribution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIWIT Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 11 minutes ago, terrywebbisgod said: But I've read on here that the RFL hate TWP,surely he should be sine die if that really is the case. Could you please repost this in English? It makes no sense as it reads now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrywebbisgod Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 3 minutes ago, TIWIT said: Could you please repost this in English? It makes no sense as it reads now. I'll speak slowly for you. IF IT IS TRUE THAT TWP ARE HATED BY THE RFL AS THEIR WHINING SUPPORTERS CLAIM,THEN HE WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR LIFE RATHER THAN NO PUNISHMENT AT ALL,EH. Thank you for your valuable contribution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dhw Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 48 minutes ago, Kayakman said: It clearly was accidental contact since the tackled player turned into him...that being said it was a blow to the head but probably really just a yellow, but I can see why a red was given....NOTHING MORE THOUGH THATS FOR SURE! If it was a red card he should receive a ban, If it was not a red, then the original decision should overturned and downgraded to a yellow card. Few sensible and/or objective people would disagree that Bodene deserved a red, it looked deliberate and he is very fortunate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Southerner80 Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Does anyone think Chris Ashton may be an option for TWP as he has left Sale and would be exempt from the Cap for year one as returning from Union. Could be a good if expensive signing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIWIT Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 14 minutes ago, terrywebbisgod said: I'll speak slowly for you. IF IT IS TRUE THAT TWP ARE HATED BY THE RFL AS THEIR WHINING SUPPORTERS CLAIM,THEN HE WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FOR LIFE RATHER THAN NO PUNISHMENT AT ALL,EH. You don't have to yell. What you just wrote now bears little resemblance to the post I questioned. 'should be sine die'? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 7 minutes ago, Southerner80 said: Does anyone think Chris Ashton may be an option for TWP as he has left Sale and would be exempt from the Cap for year one as returning from Union. Could be a good if expensive signing. He wouldn't count as 0 on the cap as he would be a 'Returning Talent' player and therefore 50% of his cap value would count until he has completed his first full SC year, then 75% for year 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Les Tonks Sidestep Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Just now, TIWIT said: You don't have to yell. What you just wrote now bears little resemblance to the post I questioned. 'should be sine die'? It says exactly the same thing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LR23 Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 Stanley has now returned to training - Wolfpack Twitter account just shared a vid. Edit: always get his first and last name mixed up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terrywebbisgod Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 16 minutes ago, TIWIT said: You don't have to yell. What you just wrote now bears little resemblance to the post I questioned. 'should be sine die'? I simplified it for you. I find I yell to foreigners who don't understand . It's an English trait. sine die /ˌsiːneɪ ˈdiːeɪ,ˌsʌɪnɪ ˈdʌɪiː/ adverb (with reference to business or proceedings that have been adjourned) with no appointed date for resumption. "the case was adjourned sine die" Thank you for your valuable contribution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Treize Hombres Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 11 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said: It says exactly the same thing! Come on....cut our Canadian friends a bit of slack. They haven't learned to shout out Gerremonside yet.....Sine die may take quite a while longer to enter their vocabulary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayakman Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 2 hours ago, Hela Wigmen said: I would argue that it wasn’t accidental and the tackles player never turned into, more he was turned in to it. Don't be ridiculous.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kayakman Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 1 hour ago, dhw said: If it was a red card he should receive a ban, If it was not a red, then the original decision should overturned and downgraded to a yellow card. Few sensible and/or objective people would disagree that Bodene deserved a red, it looked deliberate and he is very fortunate. I don't think it looked deliberate at all...rather accidental. The later crusher tackle intentionally applied to the neck of Sidlow deserves attention though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TIWIT Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 1 hour ago, terrywebbisgod said: I simplified it for you. I find I yell to foreigners who don't understand . It's an English trait. sine die /ˌsiːneɪ ˈdiːeɪ,ˌsʌɪnɪ ˈdʌɪiː/ adverb (with reference to business or proceedings that have been adjourned) with no appointed date for resumption. "the case was adjourned sine die" I would say I stand corrected because it never occurred to me it might be Latin, but then my request was that you repost in English. Which you did, so, thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robin Evans Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 8 minutes ago, Kayakman said: I don't think it looked deliberate at all...rather accidental. The later crusher tackle intentionally applied to the neck of Sidlow deserves attention though. There you go.... see, you're adopting the true RL fans traits now. You're as 'one-eyed' as the rest of us!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hela Wigmen Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 15 minutes ago, Kayakman said: Don't be ridiculous.... I’m not. You are. A ridiculous tackling technique if you even dare call it that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GUBRATS Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 3 hours ago, North but south said: Do you know how ffp works in football? The way you are posting is too ambiguous , do you mean genuine income , or do you mean donation ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
North but south Posted March 2, 2020 Share Posted March 2, 2020 28 minutes ago, GUBRATS said: The way you are posting is too ambiguous , do you mean genuine income , or do you mean donation ? Like I said similar to ffp where only a club's outgoings in transfers, employee benefits (including wages), amortisation of transfers, finance costs and dividends will be counted over income from gate receipts, TV revenue, advertising, merchandising, disposal of tangible fixed assets, finance, sales of players and prize money. Any money spent on infrastructure, training facilities or youth development will not be included. There are much smarter people than me to make the fine print but reading the current regulations on the salary cap youth players and those earning under £20k can be counted if 25 players aren't listed. There is no benefit for running a profit or a financially stable club, I'd say the current regulations it makes more sense to pay your players low wages and spend big on a couple players like sbw. It doesn't encourage investment in infrastructure or youth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.