Jump to content

The General 'Toronto Wolfpack' Discussion Thread


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 10.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

On a related topic - will SLE now be pursuing Mr Argyll so that they can get the money to pay the TWP players and refund the RL hardship fund? It was variously announced that he had given a 'cast iron guarantee' of an unbreakable promise. If he has no cash, chase him for assets.

If the guarantee was BS, who in SLE did the due diligence on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, RugbyFan99 said:

On a related topic - will SLE now be pursuing Mr Argyll so that they can get the money to pay the TWP players and refund the RL hardship fund? It was variously announced that he had given a 'cast iron guarantee' of an unbreakable promise. If he has no cash, chase him for assets.

If the guarantee was BS, who in SLE did the due diligence on this?

Would you expect them to pursue Argyle anymore vigorously than they have pursued other former owners that have bailed on clubs and left a long line of creditors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RugbyFan99 said:

On a related topic - will SLE now be pursuing Mr Argyll so that they can get the money to pay the TWP players and refund the RL hardship fund? It was variously announced that he had given a 'cast iron guarantee' of an unbreakable promise. If he has no cash, chase him for assets.

If the guarantee was BS, who in SLE did the due diligence on this?

Under which jurisdiction would you expect them to waste their money?

Sport, amongst other things, is a dream-world offering escape from harsh reality and the disturbing prospect of change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always admired McDermott both as player and coach, admire him a bit more now. 

"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let’s get this right.

For all the genuine interest and excellent crowds (and some great people as part of their fanbase) they generated, Toronto were style over substance BS merchants who ultimately let down the game, didn’t put rugby balls in kids’ hands as per their mission statement and left bills unpaid with seemingly anyone associated with them. 

They simply couldn’t be trusted and paid the price for that. Despite the holes in their business plan - and the lack of evidence for their commercial value to the wider game - the vote may have gone another way if they’d been above board. 

Covid was obviously a factor but it has to be remembered that Toronto were 0-6 and the novelty value was running thin when the season was suspended. We’ll never know for sure but they were favourites to be relegated. 

Would Argyle have stuck around after this year even without Covid given the utter horlicks they’d made of recruitment?

Tonight Brian McDermott repeatedly said Argyle had a ‘turbulent’ attitude to financing Toronto pre-Covid, when it struck he dropped them like a stone.

My point is if I was a Toronto fan I’d be just as frustrated by the owners and directors of the Wolfpack as with Super League clubs and directors. The ‘Ooh, Super League are so selfish and nasty and it’s all their fault’ attitude is a pathetic one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Man of Kent said:

Let’s get this right.

For all the genuine interest and excellent crowds (and some great people as part of their fanbase) they generated, Toronto were style over substance BS merchants who ultimately let down the game, didn’t put rugby balls in kids’ hands as per their mission statement and left bills unpaid with seemingly anyone associated with them. 

They simply couldn’t be trusted and paid the price for that. Despite the holes in their business plan - and the lack of evidence for their commercial value for the wider game - the vote may have gone another way if they’d been above board. 

Covid was obviously a factor but it has to be remembered that Toronto were 0-6 and the novelty value was running thin when the season was suspended. We’ll never know for sure but they were favourites to be relegated. 

Would Argyle have stuck around after this year even without Covid given the utter horlicks they’d made of recruitment?

Tonight Brian McDermott repeatedly said Argyle had a ‘turbulent’ attitude to financing Toronto pre-Covid, when it struck he dropped them like a stone.

My point is if I was a Toronto fan I’d be just as frustrated by the owners and directors of the Wolfpack as with Super League clubs and directors. The ‘Ooh, Super League are so selfish and nasty and it’s all their fault’ attitude is a pathetic one.

Was it running thin? Toronto at home on a televised Thursday night was a better crowd than a non televised Friday night against a well followed Hull KR.

The rest is conjecture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tommygilf said:

Was it running thin? Toronto at home on a televised Thursday night was a better crowd than a non televised Friday night against a well followed Hull KR.

The rest is conjecture.

That game at Warrington (against Saints, as I recall) in front of nobody looked absolutely awful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Smudger06 said:

Mcdermott Cant turn round and gripe, expect clubs to pay out for travel to another continent on the off chance it'll benefit them or the sport sometime deep in the future when they've got wages to pay. 

He's doing a pretty good impression of it

- Adepto Successu Per Tributum Fuga -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 05/11/2020 at 16:46, Big Picture said:

Green Bay isn't just Green Bay's team though, through various initiatives (such as playing two home matches a year in Milwaukee decades ago) they made themselves Wisconsin's team rather than just Green Bay's team.  Green Bay also benefits from its association with the big city teams which make up the NFL.  And it's the one and only major league franchise in North America not based in a big city.

The Bundesliga does have teams in some smaller cities, but they likewise all benefit from their association with the big city teams in Berlin, Munich, Cologne, Frankfurt, Dortmund, etc.  Barbarians aren't a club as such, they're an invitational team which only plays half a dozen times a year.

None of that applies to RL though, because it has no presence to speak of in Britain's major cities and thus St Helens can't benefit from the same type of association with big city teams like Green Bay and VfL Wolfsburg can.  British RL can't sell that exciting rugby team because without the big cities involved it can't bring in the sort of money needed to do that.

This forum is sadly littered with people who can't see the wood for the trees on this. Most likely because they are a different demographic and don't understand the insta generation. It's quite clear most clubs/the game doesn't either. They are the future and they are aspirational. Kids these days don't aspire to play for their local town team. They want moments, glamour, highlights they can post - you only have to see how succesful insta influencers are and how much they are worth. And where are they posting from? Glamorous places - whether that's cool, hip or fancy bars/hotels/restaurants in trendy UK cities such as Manchester, Leeds, London or cool, hip and fancy destinations such as Dubai, Maldives, cities such as New York, Sydney, LA, Toronto. They are dreamers - Toronto were aspirational and something people could believe and strive for. It was also an opportunity to change the mindset of our sport as a northern working class sport. That we may ultimately be, but does that attract sponsors, and brands that are also aspirational? Of course not........we had an opportunity to re-position ourselves and have sadly blown it (albeit i recognise the financial viability of Toronto's submission may not have been robust enough). RL/SL as it is, littered amongst small, deprived, working class towns in the north (bar Leeds, Catalans and perhaps Warrington which has become quite sprawling) is so far from aspirational or attractive to the youth of today, sponsors and commercially savvy brands that it's beyond belief. Foot shot again 🙄

On 05/11/2020 at 17:12, Hela Wigmen said:

It works well enough in Rugby Union with their events between sides that are no bigger than our biggest names. How they do it, I’m not sure entirely as it’s not my field (though it’s something I’m looking into) but it would suggest it’s possible. 

Even you are admitting you're clueless now...............I saved you the time with this earlier 🙂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Man of Kent said:

Let’s get this right.

For all the genuine interest and excellent crowds (and some great people as part of their fanbase) they generated, Toronto were style over substance BS merchants who ultimately let down the game, didn’t put rugby balls in kids’ hands as per their mission statement and left bills unpaid with seemingly anyone associated with them. 

They simply couldn’t be trusted and paid the price for that. Despite the holes in their business plan - and the lack of evidence for their commercial value to the wider game - the vote may have gone another way if they’d been above board. 

Covid was obviously a factor but it has to be remembered that Toronto were 0-6 and the novelty value was running thin when the season was suspended. We’ll never know for sure but they were favourites to be relegated. 

Would Argyle have stuck around after this year even without Covid given the utter horlicks they’d made of recruitment?

Tonight Brian McDermott repeatedly said Argyle had a ‘turbulent’ attitude to financing Toronto pre-Covid, when it struck he dropped them like a stone.

My point is if I was a Toronto fan I’d be just as frustrated by the owners and directors of the Wolfpack as with Super League clubs and directors. The ‘Ooh, Super League are so selfish and nasty and it’s all their fault’ attitude is a pathetic one.

Yes but virtually the same was said about the owner of Celtic Crusaders and probably many others before that.
Why raise everyone’s hopes and expectations each time and then disappoint them ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Man of Kent said:

Let’s get this right.

For all the genuine interest and excellent crowds (and some great people as part of their fanbase) they generated, Toronto were style over substance BS merchants who ultimately let down the game, didn’t put rugby balls in kids’ hands as per their mission statement and left bills unpaid with seemingly anyone associated with them. 

They simply couldn’t be trusted and paid the price for that. Despite the holes in their business plan - and the lack of evidence for their commercial value to the wider game - the vote may have gone another way if they’d been above board. 

Covid was obviously a factor but it has to be remembered that Toronto were 0-6 and the novelty value was running thin when the season was suspended. We’ll never know for sure but they were favourites to be relegated. 

Would Argyle have stuck around after this year even without Covid given the utter horlicks they’d made of recruitment?

Tonight Brian McDermott repeatedly said Argyle had a ‘turbulent’ attitude to financing Toronto pre-Covid, when it struck he dropped them like a stone.

My point is if I was a Toronto fan I’d be just as frustrated by the owners and directors of the Wolfpack as with Super League clubs and directors. The ‘Ooh, Super League are so selfish and nasty and it’s all their fault’ attitude is a pathetic one.

There is so much in this post that I agree with, only a couple of points which I may take issue with.

Their dealings with suppliers, and their attitude for paying bills, was appalling, and it would for sure influence my decision if I were to be asked to decide on their future. Not paying players and suppliers is just wrong. I also suspect the vote may have gone the other way but for their past shenanigans, and that’s even before the whole visa saga is raised.

I suspect the 0-6 start may actually have influenced Argyles actions. He had spent a lot of money on a team that, had Covid not struck, must have been possibles for losing every game this season, certainly they were not going to win any games outside Canada, and may only have scraped 2 or 3 wins at Lamport. Try selling such an uncompetitive team to a Canadian broadcaster, maybe he thought that he had no chance of doing that, was guaranteed to be relegated and Covid gave him the out he was looking for. We will never really know.

Development was pretty much non existent, why I don’t know. Again I have suspected that as TWP needed rugby fans of both codes to show up to games, at least until enough committed new fans were on board, Argyle took the decision not to antagonize Union, which would have been the case had RL development been successful in Unions backyard. I know it’s often said that there are no problems between the two codes in Canada but that’s the case while RL is fledgling and weak, I know a few RU people through my sons involvement in that sport and believe me that position could well have changed had RL shown signs of becoming more popular.

As an RL fan in Canada I feel frustrated by everything that has happened with TWP. Yes the attitude of some within the game has annoyed me, as has some of the comments made by some of the games so called fans, however I am also annoyed by the actions of Mr Argyle and his management team (not McDermott or previously Rowley, I’m thinking particularly Noble and Vickers), who had a great chance to establish the sport, I thank him for his investment but feel things needed to be planned so much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Smudger06 said:

Mcdermott Cant turn round and gripe, expect clubs to pay out for travel to another continent on the off chance it'll benefit them or the sport sometime deep in the future when they've got wages to pay. 

Presumably the other clubs knew where Toronto was when they invited them in, in the first place?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We say this is “the greatest game of all” but then tell teams, clubs, towns from outside the M62 corridor “sorry you can’t join in” 

As McDermott reminded us they didn’t get a share of the sky money. Aren’t Catalan “guests” and not members of SL?

So Toronto are just another lost opportunity along with PSG, welsh clubs, Russia, Georgia et al 

pathetic

"Freedom without socialism is privilege and injustice, socialism without freedom is slavery and brutality" - Mikhail Bakunin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.