Fri 28 Feb: SL: Leeds Rhinos v Warrington Wolves KO 7.45pm (TV)

[Man of Kent]

24-0 Leeds after 53

[meast]

That Hurrell try sums up the crazy system we've got now, absolutely no evidence to suggest it was grounded.

[Bedfordshire Bronco]

Hurrel reminds me of Justin Carney 

[DavidM]

It went up as a no try remember , I mean , eh , a try to referee Chris Hicks . Yes there it is ... where ? Nurse

[Harry Stottle]

Newmans Fermonimal says tez

[The Hallucinating Goose]

That was never grounded. What an awful decision. 

[muckymunksy]

6 minutes ago, Bedfordshire Bronco said:

I think Leed's have made them look poor. Outmuscled completely in the middle 

I disagree Wire aren’t interested in playing in this mud bath.

[Just Browny]

We have been bad enough on our own. I've no idea why Hicks has just decided to start giving Leeds everything to prove the point.

[Man of Kent]

If the job of a coach is to get the best from his players then Steve Price is doing a very poor job

[EastLondonMike]

Christ. Awful decision.

[Old Frightful]

What was wrong with that effort from Luke Briscoe?

Perfectly good try.

[Padge]

2 minutes ago, Harry Stottle said:

He is either guilty of intent or not,  which is it.

It is a defenders job to avoid contact with the head, if it happens in those circumstances he did not manage to avoid contact but did not intend the contact.

Lesson learned is be careful when you throw yourself into an attempted big hit.

[DavidM]

1 minute ago, Harry Stottle said:

Newmans Fermonimal says tez

And Brand was a class act he can’t wait to see

[Harry Stottle]

I only ever write in these columns when the game is not so good,  I have wrote more than ever before during this game!

[Bedfordshire Bronco]

1 minute ago, muckymunksy said:

I disagree Wire aren’t interested in playing in this mud bath.

Its a sand bath I think

Interested or not they are getting tw***ed down the middle and left edge

[Guest]

Widdop is terrible.

[Jim Prendle]

Just now, Padge said:

It is a defenders job to avoid contact with the head, if it happens in those circumstances he did not manage to avoid contact but did not intend the contact.

Lesson learned is be careful when you throw yourself into an attempted big hit.

Wire’s thugism coming back to bite them again.

[Padge]

2 minutes ago, meast said:

That Hurrell try sums up the crazy system we've got now, absolutely no evidence to suggest it was grounded.

Laws of the game say that you cannot disallow a try because you didn't see it grounded. Decision correct to the laws.

 

[DavidM]

4 minutes ago, meast said:

That Hurrell try sums up the crazy system we've got now, absolutely no evidence to suggest it was grounded.

Officials have no idea and have a wild guess and VR backs it up despite the no evidence at all the ball went near the ground . Why they don’t just let the VR decide I don’t know

[Ant]

Just now, Padge said:

Laws of the game say that you cannot disallow a try because you didn't see it grounded. Decision correct to the laws.

 

But you can disallow one when it's clearly held up!

[Harry Stottle]

1 minute ago, Padge said:

It is a defenders job to avoid contact with the head, if it happens in those circumstances he did not manage to avoid contact but did not intend the contact.

Lesson learned is be careful when you throw yourself into an attempted big hit.

Then tacklers should stand there like a traffic cop and wave them through. 

[GUBRATS]

1 minute ago, Padge said:

It is a defenders job to avoid contact with the head, if it happens in those circumstances he did not manage to avoid contact but did not intend the contact.

Lesson learned is be careful when you throw yourself into an attempted big hit.

Or don't tackle above the knee 

[meast]

Just now, DavidM said:

Officials have no idea and have a wild guess and VR backs it up despite the no evidence at all the ball went near the ground 

It's an embarrassment!

It's a complete and utter farce.

Nearly as embarrassing as Warrington.

[Dave T]

1 minute ago, Padge said:

Laws of the game say that you cannot disallow a try because you didn't see it grounded. Decision correct to the laws.

 

Yeah, I don't mind that one tbh, as for me you just couldn't see either way. Prior to this system they would give benefit of the doubt to the attack so would be a try. 

We also shouldn't forget that Hicks didn't have the same angles that we watched, so if he believes he saw the ball hit the ground then it is all good. 

[GUBRATS]

Agar for GB