Jump to content

Who would you want in SL


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 90
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Marty Funkhouser said:

The Wigan team of 1987

St Helens of 2001

Leeds of 2015

Widnes of 1989

Castleford of 2017

Hull KR of 1984

Hull FC of 1983

Salford of 1974

Hunslet of 1908

Swinton of 1928

Huddersfield of 1915

Warrington of 1987

Halifax of 1986

Wakefield of 1967

 

 

 

 

And Murphy's Leigh team of 82 will beat them all ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, One F in Wakefield said:

Wakefield

Cas

Leeds

Hull

Wigan

Saints

Catalan

Hull FC

Hull KR

Wire

Bradford

Toulouse

Newcastle

London

 

2 hours ago, Dunbar said:

Barcelona

New York Knicks

Dallas Cowboys

The Avengers

London Broncos

Spartak Moscow

The Justice League

Boca Juniors

The cast of the musical Chicago

Harlem Globetrotters 

Castleford Tigers

University of Central Lancashire

(p.s I'm only picking 12 because I am not an expansionist)

The Avengers? The rather cracking old SF punk band or the Marvel version ? ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gray1967 said:

 

The Avengers? The rather cracking old SF punk band or the Marvel version ? ?

Purdey, Steed and Gambit.

Not the biggest squad in Super League though... but just ahead of Toronto.

"The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby.

"If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wigan

St Helens

Warrington

Salford

Leeds

Hull FC

Hull KR

Castleford 

Catalans

Toulouse

Toronto

London

Cardiff (I’d nickname them the Dockers, playing to the city’s port and quay industry).

Newcastle

 

-

I’d also have a second tier (8-12 teams) for development purposes both for players and clubs themselves, a bit akin to a 4-year license where they’re aiming to grow based on community clubs in their local area, schools playing the game, attendances and facilities. 
 

-

Academies? I’d have all of them based at universities to ensure all aspiring pros are accessing a quality education for a Plan B, if and when they require it. This will also give immediate access to opportunities for non-heartland players.
 

Manchester, Liverpool, UCLAN, Chester, Leeds, Leeds Beckett, Newcastle, York, Hull, Sheffield, Nottingham, Bristol, Cardiff, Birmingham, St Mary’s, Herriot Wat, Exeter, UC Dublin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, M j M said:

They've had their chance and blew it - the sport shouldn't keep on repeating the same old mistakes.

I know, but I have a soft spot for the town.

Learn to listen without distortion and learn to look without imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The correct answer is:

 

Wigan, St. Helens, Warrington.

Leeds, Bradford, Hull FC, Hull KR,, Castleford,

London, Newcastle,

Catalans, Toulouse, Avignon, Paris

Toronto, Ottawa, New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago

 

Yes. That’s correct. 20 teams, consisting of 10 English, 4 French, and 6 North American. This would require recruitment and intense training of North American rugby union players and high school American football players.

The English teams would play in one conference. The French and North American teams would play in a different conference (sponsored by Airbus and Boeing), with separate TV contracts for France and North America, but with reciprocal rights shared with UK TV broadcasters..

In future years we could expand to 24 by adding Montreal, Jacksonville, Lyon, and Marseilles. We would then move to a 3 conference system, each conference having 8 teams. These conferences would be:  1. English heartland; 2. France and England expansionists; 3. North America.

Any questions?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Manfred Mann said:

The correct answer is:

 

Wigan, St. Helens, Warrington.

Leeds, Bradford, Hull FC, Hull KR,, Castleford,

London, Newcastle,

Catalans, Toulouse, Avignon, Paris

Toronto, Ottawa, New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Chicago

 

Yes. That’s correct. 20 teams, consisting of 10 English, 4 French, and 6 North American. This would require recruitment and intense training of North American rugby union players and high school American football players.

The English teams would play in one conference. The French and North American teams would play in a different conference (sponsored by Airbus and Boeing), with separate TV contracts for France and North America.

In future years we could expand to 24 by adding Montreal, Jacksonville, Lyon, and Marseilles. We would then move to a 3 conference system, each conference having 8 teams. These conferences would be:  1. English heartland; 2. France and England expansionists; 3. North America.

Any questions?

 

 

 

English guy doesn't get conferences idea.

You obviously don't pay much attention to North American sports. Your structure is completely wrong.

Learn to listen without distortion and learn to look without imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mister Ting said:

English guy doesn't get conferences idea.

You obviously don't pay much attention to North American sports. Your structure is completely wrong.

The conference members plays each other members of same conference until playoffs. Then top 2 or top 4 in each conference goes to playoffs.

Why is the North American structure completely wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mister Ting said:

Having one conference in a small geographical area and another in a much larger one is illogical. Unless you could get Scotty to beam to teams around.

Not illogical if you can get airline sponsors as well as other sponsors for the large area  conference.

And surely TV contracts in 3 countries, with reciprocal sharing rights, would ensure strong fan bases in each country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Manfred Mann said:

Not illogical if you can get airline sponsors as well as other sponsors for the large area  conference.

And surely TV contracts in 3 countries, with reciprocal sharing rights, would ensure strong fan bases in each country.

But why not mix the English teams into seperate conferences? Having a conference based on British or English teams would be to miss an opportunity.

I can't think of another sport that would come up with that system.

Learn to listen without distortion and learn to look without imagination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Mister Ting said:

You obviously don't pay much attention to North American sports. Your structure is completely wrong.

I do pay attention to American sports. The initial choice of teams from North America reflects existing concrete reality (Toronto) and concrete plans ( Ottawa, New York) and then plausible expansion to 6 teams which would be practical from a logistical-economic point of view, as well as a media market point of view.

If after a few years rugby league becomes very popular in North America because of the TV coverage of the 20 team Super League, then we could look at a stand alone North American League, which would likely consist of 16 teams initially, mostly located in major media markets, most of which already have NFL teams:

Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal, Vancouver

New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Washington, Atlanta, Jacksonville,

Chicago, Houston, Denver, 

San Francisco, Los Angeles, Seattle,

 

That team list would be attractive to a US television network because of media market significance and geographic spread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.