Jump to content

Criteria for 12th place..


Silverlight

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, getemonsideblog said:

York as a club, city and area offer more than any other club in the mix. It's the 21st century, stop heralding past glories and look forwards. What can other teams offer that we can't? This is - and should be - about more than just on the pitch and selling a few more burgers and pints on the terraces. Especially when capacities will be capped next season and away followings minimal as a result.

No. The be all and end all is that success should be earned on the pitch. Sport is just that sport, not a business. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Ainley Top said:

No. The be all and end all is that success should be earned on the pitch. Sport is just that sport, not a business. 

I'm sure most would agree. However, this opportunity has arisen. York - and the other applicants - would be daft to sidestep it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Ainley Top said:

 Sport is just that sport, not a business. 

I take it you missed all that Northern Union stuff that went on in Huddersfield in 1895 then?

http://www.alldesignandprint.co.uk

Printing & Graphic Design with Nationwide Service

Programmes Leaflets Cards Banners & Flags Letterheads Tickets Magazines Folders | Brand Identity plus much more

Official Matchday Programme Print & Design Partner to York City Knights, Heworth ARLFC, York Acorn RLFC & Hunslet RLFC

Official Player Sponsor of Marcus Stock for the 2020 Season

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 18/11/2020 at 20:08, Mike M said:

They are late filing accounts and other information with Companies House. So don't qualify. 

That doesn't rule them out at all, it's just one of the assessment criteria which have different (unpublicised) weightings. FWIW they also apparently have unsatisfied CCJs against them. But with a low weighting for this section of the assessment it could be effectively irrelevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said:

That doesn't rule them out at all, it's just one of the assessment criteria which have different (unpublicised) weightings. FWIW they also apparently have unsatisfied CCJs against them. But with a low weighting for this section of the assessment it could be effectively irrelevant.

What are the weighting percentages by criteria if you seem to know so much. If late filing accounts and have CCJ's then in my opinion should not even be considered. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mike M said:

What are the weighting percentages by criteria if you seem to know so much. If late filing accounts and have CCJ's then in my opinion should not even be considered. 

The weightings aren't being published - but they exist

The documentation reveals that each criterion will carry a different weighting, but it doesn’t disclose what the weightings are.

It reads: “The Panel will have absolute discretion in the weighting of the Assessment Criteria. For the avoidance of doubt, the Assessment Criteria do not carry equal weight.”

Six clubs to do battle for Super League vacancy – TotalRL.com | Rugby League Express | Rugby League World).

.Late filing etc are listed only as factors that will be taken into account when carrying out the assessment. The only criteria that ruled anyone out were finishing positions and average crowds over the previous 2 seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Les Tonks Sidestep said:

The weightings aren't being published - but they exist

The documentation reveals that each criterion will carry a different weighting, but it doesn’t disclose what the weightings are.

It reads: “The Panel will have absolute discretion in the weighting of the Assessment Criteria. For the avoidance of doubt, the Assessment Criteria do not carry equal weight.”

Six clubs to do battle for Super League vacancy – TotalRL.com | Rugby League Express | Rugby League World).

.Late filing etc are listed only as factors that will be taken into account when carrying out the assessment. The only criteria that ruled anyone out were finishing positions and average crowds over the previous 2 seasons. 

So how can you state finances are a low weighting criteria if unpublicised. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20/11/2020 at 22:26, georgeb1 said:

Could it be possible that whoever Win's the vote to be claiming the vacant position of 12th club in superleague is moving into a very uncompetitive competition , having just witnessed the semi's in their prestigious competition the victors won by a massive 77 points to 4 . Wigan and saints are streets ahead , Leeds and Warrington are the nearest challengers , the rest to be honest are ALSO-RANS . championship for me any day.😀😀😀

And if you look at all 4 of them, everyone has excellent academies alongside their quality first team. Any team without a decent off field setup will struggle massively especially when injuries catch up. Basically you are amongst 8 clubs competing for 5th and avoiding relegation! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/11/2020 at 21:51, Mike M said:

Also 1.5M in debt up nearly 1M from a year before. How can they even be considered? 

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/sport/18131271.amp/

Debt is much lower now. Accounts are due to be released soon which will show this. Andrew Chalmers wrote off what he was owed which covered majority of the the £1.5mil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.