Jump to content

Another SL restructure is being planned


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 434
  • Created
  • Last Reply
16 minutes ago, Cumbrian Mackem said:

14 teams.

2 teams to be relegated at seasons end.

top 5 playoffs.

no more loop fixtures.

Thats what I’d like to see 👍

You know what is likely then?

10 teams, more loop fixtures.

new rise.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't see the current SL Clubs who are mostly skint agreeing to anything that's going to inconvenience them or have them splitting funds with 14 clubs instead of the current split of 11 clubs. 

And that's the problem, doesn't matter how you restructure, turkeys aren't going to vote for Xmas 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Daddy said:

I can't see the current SL Clubs who are mostly skint agreeing to anything that's going to inconvenience them or have them splitting funds with 14 clubs instead of the current split of 11 clubs. 

And that's the problem, doesn't matter how you restructure, turkeys aren't going to vote for Xmas 

And the slow death of super league will continue then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thirteen teams, each club gets 2 byes, 24 games top 4 play off, bottom team plays top team in championship for promotion, break for mid season internationals, draw for whose bye coincides with magic if it must be continued with, if chosen taken out of draw for following seasons until all clubs have missed it. So obvious that it will never be implemented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said:

Twelve team closed shop Super League with minimum standards introduced and long term plans for growth to 14, 16 etc. Diluting the competition further by adding two teams now is not the route to go down and in eighteen months, people will want change. Again. 

Do you offer any points for on-field performance as part of the criteria? If so, there is no way of assessing York or Toulouse against Salford etc. However, Salford have reached two finals but are run like a ghost operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Scubby said:

Do you offer any points for on-field performance as part of the criteria? If so, there is no way of assessing York or Toulouse against Salford etc. However, Salford have reached two finals but are run like a ghost operation.

If it was me in charge, onfield would be encapsulated by a few factors - historic performance, capability to spend a high % of the salary cap, the makeup of squads (homegrown at the club, other homegrown and overseas) and would tie in with player pathways, too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said:

Twelve team closed shop Super League with minimum standards introduced and long term plans for growth to 14, 16 etc. Diluting the competition further by adding two teams now is not the route to go down and in eighteen months, people will want change. Again. 

Been there. 'Done' that. Failed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Northern Eel said:

Been there. 'Done' that. Failed.

No, we haven’t. There were no minimum standards, just a ring fence put around some clubs and not others. A properly policed set of minimum standards is desperately required, though simply won’t happen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Hela Wigmen said:

No, we haven’t. There were no minimum standards, just a ring fence put around some clubs and not others. A properly policed set of minimum standards is desperately required, though simply won’t happen. 

I wonder why I put quote marks around 'done'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Clogiron said:

Thirteen teams, each club gets 2 byes, 24 games top 4 play off, bottom team plays top team in championship for promotion, break for mid season internationals, draw for whose bye coincides with magic if it must be continued with, if chosen taken out of draw for following seasons until all clubs have missed it. So obvious that it will never be implemented.

You cannot have an odd number of games and an odd number of teams 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hela Wigmen said:

No, we haven’t. There were no minimum standards, just a ring fence put around some clubs and not others. A properly policed set of minimum standards is desperately required, though simply won’t happen. 

How many clubs would meet such standards though?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.