2022 New Kits, Sponsors and Suppliers

[Henson Park Old Firm]

[Spidey]

13 minutes ago, Wellsy4HullFC said:

The main sponsor is practically invisible. What's the point in it being so small?!

The Nissan bit of its new. Makes it too wide

[DI Keith Fowler]

34 minutes ago, Spidey said:

The Nissan bit of its new. Makes it too wide

Probably realised no one knows it as Bristol Street Motors, better its's Widnes Nissan, or for those with a longer memory Widnes Car Centre. 

 

Edited December 10, 2021 by DI Keith Fowler

[Wellsy4HullFC]

34 minutes ago, Futtocks said:

People complain when sponsor logos are too visible, people complain when they're not visible enough. That's what I have learned from this thread.

I was waiting for that!

I was thinking more from the sponsor's side. I mean, it's not noticeable at all but on prime real estate. What's the point of forking out money then putting that on the shirt?!

[Aerosaint]

1 hour ago, DI Keith Fowler said:

Oh my, that's the worst of all. 

[Man of Kent]

The 2022 vintage seems a good argument for less is more, ie two-year designs done well rather than annual launches that look cheap & nasty.

[gingerjon]

11 hours ago, Wellsy4HullFC said:

The main sponsor is practically invisible. What's the point in it being so small?!

It looks like it's the logo they'd use for their email footer and they've just transferred it over.

[barnyia]

The Catalan kit should be out soon, looking at the training stuff the players have I can't see the kit being a classic this year, what's macron kit designs usually like? 

[Tommygilf]

2 minutes ago, barnyia said:

The Catalan kit should be out soon, looking at the training stuff the players have I can't see the kit being a classic this year, what's macron kit designs usually like? 

For rugby they've been generally alright. Quite bold and blocky, in a good way imo. 

I remember over a decade ago when they started in English football and made my teams kits they weren't especially well loved, but they appear to have improved dramatically since then.

[Wellsy4HullFC]

3 hours ago, gingerjon said:

It looks like it's the logo they'd use for their email footer and they've just transferred it over.

Exactly what I thought.

Or a bumper sticker!

[DavidM]

15 hours ago, DI Keith Fowler said:

Deary me , completely horrific . Widnes used to have some iconic strips . Some designers need sacking looking at the jazzy rubbish they throw out .

Edited December 11, 2021 by DavidM

[Waynebennettswinger]

15 hours ago, Futtocks said:

People complain when sponsor logos are too visible, people complain when they're not visible enough. That's what I have learned from this thread.

Are you complaining about people complaining? 

[Futtocks]

19 minutes ago, Waynebennettswinger said:

Are you complaining about people complaining? 

Yes. In green crayon.

[Wellsy4HullFC]

36 minutes ago, Futtocks said:

Yes. In green crayon.

And on green paper.

[Damien]

4 hours ago, gingerjon said:

It looks like it's the logo they'd use for their email footer and they've just transferred it over.

I laughed out loud reading this because you have it spot on. Its shocking really, the sponsor cant be happy with that surely.

[Damien]

8 hours ago, Man of Kent said:

The 2022 vintage seems a good argument for less is more, ie two-year designs done well rather than annual launches that look cheap & nasty.

With a few notable exceptions 2022 has to be the worst ever for kit designs.

[Man of Kent]

Just now, Damien said:

With a few notable exceptions 2022 has to be the worst ever for kit designs.

Awful. These are proud clubs with 100-150+ years of history and their players shouldn’t be wearing such tat. 

Might be better to launch a home kit one year, away the next, with heritage/one-offs in between. 
 

[Futtocks]

31 minutes ago, Wellsy4HullFC said:

And on green paper.

And in very small writing.

[Tommygilf]

11 minutes ago, Man of Kent said:

Awful. These are proud clubs with 100-150+ years of history and their players shouldn’t be wearing such tat. 

Might be better to launch a home kit one year, away the next, with heritage/one-offs in between. 
 

That doesn't protect you from a ###### kit, and just means you have it for longer.

[Davo5]

29 minutes ago, Damien said:

With a few notable exceptions 2022 has to be the worst ever for kit designs.

Wigan/Hull FC home & away,Leeds home & Huddersfield home are the standouts for me the rest range from ok to shocking.

[giasf]

I like away but it does look more like a referee kit than a club kit. 

[Man of Kent]

2 hours ago, Tommygilf said:

That doesn't protect you from a ###### kit, and just means you have it for longer.

I wasn’t referring to Leeds, they have great kits.

[Tommygilf]

7 hours ago, Man of Kent said:

I wasn’t referring to Leeds, they have great kits.

Its true of any kit manufacturer though. 

[welshmagpie]

Last year’s green and grey hoops were far nicer. 

Another odd-decision by an oddly run club.

[RigbyLuger]

Who are we waiting for now?