Jump to content

Attendances (Multiple Merged Threads)


Recommended Posts


32 minutes ago, Ste93 said:

I'm wondering as the regular season is finished now, if anyone has any idea which teams are up and down compared to 2019, and the league as a whole? 

2019/2022

Castleford 7,253/ 7,542 (+289)

Catalans 9,333 (10,560*)/ 8,068 (-1,265/2,492) *- Average including the Barcelona attendance

Huddersfield 5,222/ 5,144 (-78)

Hull FC 11,478 / 10,771 (- 707)

Hull KR 8,185/ 7,788 (-397)

Leeds 11,838/ 12,866 (+1,028)

Salford 3,676/ 4,480* ( +804) *- no figure posted for R27 as yet

St Helens 11,910/ 11,701 (-209)

Wakefield 5,469/4,614 (-855)

Warrington 10,970/8,852 (-2,118)

Wigan 11,432/ 12,280 (+848)

London 2019- 2,021

Toulouse 2022- 4,967

 

Increases

Leeds 1,028

Wigan 848

Salford 804

Castleford 289

 

Decreases

Warrington 2,118

Catalans 1,265/2,492 (if taking the Barcelona game into account)

Wakefield 855

Hull FC 707

Hull KR 397

St Helens 209

Huddersfield 78

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, meast said:

2019/2022

Castleford 7,253/ 7,542 (+289)

Catalans 9,333 (10,560*)/ 8,068 (-1,265/2,492) *- Average including the Barcelona attendance

Huddersfield 5,222/ 5,144 (-78)

Hull FC 11,478 / 10,771 (- 707)

Hull KR 8,185/ 7,788 (-397)

Leeds 11,838/ 12,866 (+1,028)

Salford 3,676/ 4,480* ( +804) *- no figure posted for R27 as yet

St Helens 11,910/ 11,701 (-209)

Wakefield 5,469/4,614 (-855)

Warrington 10,970/8,852 (-2,118)

Wigan 11,432/ 12,280 (+848)

London 2019- 2,021

Toulouse 2022- 4,967

 

Increases

Leeds 1,028

Wigan 848

Salford 804

Castleford 289

 

Decreases

Warrington 2,118

Catalans 1,265/2,492 (if taking the Barcelona game into account)

Wakefield 855

Hull FC 707

Hull KR 397

St Helens 209

Huddersfield 78

All in all, it could have been a lot worse. Seems that no long term damage was done by the pandemic at least in Superleague, so credit to all involved in running the clubs, and also to the RFL who IMO did get the big calls right during COVID. 

But longer term we need to see some growth to compete, especially with broadcasting revenues fallimg. So now on the back of RLWC and with IMG's help I hope we'll start moving upwards again. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, meast said:

2019/2022

Castleford 7,253/ 7,542 (+289)

Catalans 9,333 (10,560*)/ 8,068 (-1,265/2,492) *- Average including the Barcelona attendance

Huddersfield 5,222/ 5,144 (-78)

Hull FC 11,478 / 10,771 (- 707)

Hull KR 8,185/ 7,788 (-397)

Leeds 11,838/ 12,866 (+1,028)

Salford 3,676/ 4,480* ( +804) *- no figure posted for R27 as yet

St Helens 11,910/ 11,701 (-209)

Wakefield 5,469/4,614 (-855)

Warrington 10,970/8,852 (-2,118)

Wigan 11,432/ 12,280 (+848)

London 2019- 2,021

Toulouse 2022- 4,967

 

Increases

Leeds 1,028

Wigan 848

Salford 804

Castleford 289

 

Decreases

Warrington 2,118

Catalans 1,265/2,492 (if taking the Barcelona game into account)

Wakefield 855

Hull FC 707

Hull KR 397

St Helens 209

Huddersfield 78

Are the loop fixtures included in those attendances meast. What would the average be if it was for just the eleven regular home games without the loops ?. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Josef K said:

Are the loop fixtures included in those attendances meast. What would the average be if it was for just the eleven regular home games without the loops ?. 

How can you say which is the loop fixture, if they play eachother at home twice? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Josef K said:

Id class the second fixture as a loop fixture. 

 

15 minutes ago, bobbruce said:

My guess is it will stay about the same as if you look through it sometimes the second fixture has the highest attendance. 

The general consensus is that loop fixtures are a turn off,  therefore it would make sense to remove the lowest crowd of the repeat fixtures. 

If you felt that is a worthwhile exercise of course. 

What it does show is that the crowds have returned just fine following the pandemic,  despite the prophecies of doom. 

The challenge now is that 2019 was hardly a vintage year,  and with the current cost of living crisis,  I think season ticket sales will be tough this year. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Dave T said:

 

The general consensus is that loop fixtures are a turn off,  therefore it would make sense to remove the lowest crowd of the repeat fixtures. 

If you felt that is a worthwhile exercise of course. 

What it does show is that the crowds have returned just fine following the pandemic,  despite the prophecies of doom. 

The challenge now is that 2019 was hardly a vintage year,  and with the current cost of living crisis,  I think season ticket sales will be tough this year. 

Indeed , many may not want to commit , and will pick and choose when affordable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, GUBRATS said:

Indeed , many may not want to commit , and will pick and choose when affordable 

It'll be interesting to see how clubs respond to the current situation.  Ignoring it ain't an option. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Most of the ups and downs look like they  have club-specific underlying causes rather than game-wide issues which is good news I think. We all know how bad things at Warrington and Hull are, it's not surprising their fans have switched off. Leeds were still playing with reduced capacity at Headingley for a few games at the start of 2019 (although I'm not sure any were actually sold out). Wigan had two derby games this year vs two at Saints in 2019.

Catalan are a bit of a concern as their crowds even excluding the Barcelona game seem a bit down generally for reasons I can't pinpoint. I mean I'd struggle to turn up if my team was coached by McNamara but I doubt that's the reason.

Edited by M j M
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Dave T said:

 

The challenge now is that 2019 was hardly a vintage year,  and with the current cost of living crisis,  I think season ticket sales will be tough this year. 

And for a significant minority of us in the Southern part of the country it is especially difficult as fans 

My fuel bill going to away games or SL games is massively more than it was. Hotels massively more too 

Personally I can absorb it but I worry about the tipping point. The WC is going to be affected by this issue at least a bit. I'm planning games but maybe not as many as I would if petrol were still 130p a litre

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bedfordshire Bronco said:

And for a significant minority of us in the Southern part of the country it is especially difficult as fans 

My fuel bill going to away games or SL games is massively more than it was. Hotels massively more too 

Personally I can absorb it but I worry about the tipping point. The WC is going to be affected by this issue at least a bit. I'm planning games but maybe not as many as I would if petrol were still 130p a litre

Go by train 😉

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 04/09/2022 at 13:33, meast said:

5,524 at Huddersfield on Friday night including a good following from Wakefield for their 'just done enough to survive again ' party 😄

And a group of Ukrainian refugees who were given tickets, shirts and enjoyed the game.

That is a fantastic effort from Huddersfield and their fans. Excellent stuff in a period where we are all "doing it tough"...

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Londonbornirishbred said:

Weren't the Sharks impacted by their ground being redeveloped? Could have sworn they were limited to 11,500? That would explain their drop in gates. 

It would have had a slight impact but only four of the eleven home games were 11,500. For two games they went close to a sell out and five games were under five figures. I'll add a comment on that to clarify.

  • Like 1

My blog: https://rugbyl.blogspot.co.nz/

It takes wisdom to know when a discussion has run its course.

It takes reasonableness to end that discussion. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, RayCee said:

It would have had a slight impact but only four of the eleven home games were 11,500. For two games they went close to a sell out and five games were under five figures. I'll add a comment on that to clarify.

No biggie...just I've noticed it looks very much like a good bit of the ground isn't finished or roofed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.