Sun 27 Mar: CC6: Warrington Wolves v Wakefield Trinity KO 14:00 (Premier)

[Old Frightful]

Crowd looks to be about 3K if that.

[WakefieldCityLoyal]

19 minutes ago, johnh1 said:

I can confidently predict you won’t be winning at Wembley this year.

That’s what I mean.

Up the Trin 

[snapski]

1 minute ago, Old Frightful said:

Opinions eh?

I think they're rubbish.

Wire over again and it's not looking great for Trin.

Might just be my loathing of Bill Arthur that enables me to enjoy most of the others.

[johnh1]

At least Mark Wilson talks about what is actually happening on the pitch.

[Old Frightful]

1 minute ago, johnh1 said:

At least Mark Wilson talks about what is actually happening on the pitch.

Did you hear his earlier question to Eorl?

"Does going 100m up the pitch in a set give you confidence?".

FFS.

[OMEGA]

Millers been awful so far in the game, poor decision, poor execution and poor defence. Williams is running all over him

[Old Frightful]

I think a VR might have suggested that was reefed out had Jack Smith used the VR.

Tough call on Trin.

Ben Currie over the line looking like a certain try but Trin do a "Houghton".

[snapski]

Good try. Top notch Pete defence as usual. 

[Old Frightful]

Murphy gets his and Wakey's first.

Has Ollie Holmes been to see the same people that Zak Hardaker and Luke Gale saw?

[OMEGA]

Great hands from Wakefield, Jowitt, Hall and Murphy combine to score a superb try.

All three products of the Wakefield youth system too

[Futtocks]

Nice try that, especially as it is Murphy's first one for the club.

[Futtocks]

Nice conversion, too!

[snapski]

Any chance they can bin the 6 again nonsense 

[snapski]

What is that reffing

[Piggy's mate]

Just now, snapski said:

What is that reffing

His usual standard!!

[Old Frightful]

Dear God!!!

How in the world did he not see that? A possible penalty try and definite sin bin.

[Northern Eel]

I defend referees where there is a defence, but sometimes, they just don’t help themselves. That’s a really poor decision not to at least have a look, as in my book that’s a penalty try and a yellow card; as clear as day. 

[johnh1]

He didn’t even need to ‘see it’. Player goes down. Ask the video ref.

[Futtocks]

Horrible error from the referee. At the very least and however far away he was, it still must have looked like something that warranted a second look.

[snapski]

Just now, Piggy's mate said:

His usual standard!!

At least use the help provided by the tv. Penalty try and at least a sin binning. It’s disgraceful

[OMEGA]

It’s a penalty try and a sin bin clear cut and easy to see even as it happened, no need for a replay

I have to wonder why the ref was so intent on rushing to a decision!

[weloveyouwakefield2]

The referee should be downgraded to under 9’s after that decision what was he watching???

[Agbrigg]

He had the VR why not just check. He needs sacking after that for not at least having a look

[EagleEyePie]

I really can't understand that call. There was clearly a coming together of some sort, that was obvious. What possible reason is there for not referring it to the video ref? I know refs have a tough job and it's easy to criticise but that's baffled me. The last thing you want in must win games is to make a crucial error and I can't work out how he could have convinced himself there was nothing worth looking at.

[Harry Stottle]

There is no reason under the rules of the game for the ref not to have a second look at that through the VR, it just beggars belief why he should just ignore it.