Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
42 minutes ago, RL Tragic said:

Brilliantly put forward and informative comment . My only thought on that would be is the surplus in the NRL or to that point RFL such that the investment it is making is not being detrimental to its core product. I can totally understand say in football this is definitely not an issue , and for the NRL it may be a drop in the Ocean , I don’t know the answer but just posing the question. 

What is the *core product" of the RFL? Super League is supposedly a separate entity, so isn't the RFL supposed to grow the game?

  • Like 1

Posted
20 minutes ago, RigbyLuger said:

What is the *core product" of the RFL? Super League is supposedly a separate entity, so isn't the RFL supposed to grow the game?

Well I would say that without a flagship mens competition ( Super league )  there would be very little to speak of as a game , public interest would dwindle rapidly to nothing . To maintain a flagship mens league you need a grassroots structure that provides players . The amateur game has dwindled and is dwindling in the UK .  I don’t think this is such an issue in Australia . 

Posted
31 minutes ago, RigbyLuger said:

What is the *core product" of the RFL? Super League is supposedly a separate entity, so isn't the RFL supposed to grow the game?

From a revenue generating perspective the core products of the RFL are the Challenge Cup and internationals. I do absolutely agree that it is within the RFL's to grow and develop the game.

  • Like 1
Posted
15 hours ago, The Rocket said:

 the high quality entertainment that the NRLW is once again providing.

This only becomes materially relevant when there`s an audience able and willing to recognize it. The experience of other sports indicates that investment in participation is the best means of delivering new demographics. It`s a slow process, and RL embarked on it very late.

Put bluntly, there are too many morons in the existing RL fanbase. Blokes who aren`t very clever like to signal that they are. Ostentatiously dismissing women`s RL is a tempting cheap shot even for genuine fans of the game, since they`re already spoilt for choice with 3 NRL games a week on FTA TV and 8 on STV at a modest cost.

Posted
16 hours ago, The Rocket said:

 yet always patently obvious to those not brainwashed from birth.

The Graeme Bradley fan who impersonates you in another dimension of the multiverse presented some evidence the other day of a further infiltration of virus-carrying Victorian cultists into Queensland.

  • Haha 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted
1 hour ago, Pulga said:

https://www.nrl.com/news/2024/03/28/new-nrlw-teams-announced-for-2025-competition/

 

2 more for 2025. Warriors and Bulldogs.

I really didn't think we needed another Sydney team yet.

Warriors was all but assured. Same compelling case for re-inclusion as for original inclusion in the 4-team NRLW.

Canterbury have lately invested across the board in female RL after previously seeming indifferent. Maybe hit by fear of missing out. Bulldogs under-17s and under-19s are at or near the top of the ladders in their respective NSW comps.

Storm or Dolphins would have been better in terms of geographic spread, but probably neither yet ready. 

Posted

I think the great thing about this is the NRLW's aggressive vision - they want to go even further than the NRL in terms of being the undisputed #1 club rugby comp. They'll continue to attract the best players in the world to play in the best environment.

  • Like 5
Posted
On 28/03/2024 at 11:48, Pulga said:

https://www.nrl.com/news/2024/03/28/new-nrlw-teams-announced-for-2025-competition/

 

2 more for 2025. Warriors and Bulldogs.

I really didn't think we needed another Sydney team yet.

Out of curiosity then Pulga, who would be your other team (assuming you agree with NZ, which I'm pretty confident you are).

Candidates are Melbourne, South Sydney, Penrith, Redcliffe The, Manly.

3 are Sydney (ish). Melbourne has very little in the way of the women's game from what I understand. The are still setting up their men's team and NRL entity in general.

The dogs were late to the party, but from what I know are spending a lot of effort and money now. Western Sydney is quite under-represented. I think they were a good choice, bias be damned.

Posted
1 hour ago, stookie said:

Out of curiosity then Pulga, who would be your other team (assuming you agree with NZ, which I'm pretty confident you are).

Candidates are Melbourne, South Sydney, Penrith, Redcliffe The, Manly.

3 are Sydney (ish). Melbourne has very little in the way of the women's game from what I understand. The are still setting up their men's team and NRL entity in general.

The dogs were late to the party, but from what I know are spending a lot of effort and money now. Western Sydney is quite under-represented. I think they were a good choice, bias be damned.

Melbourne. The brand is already huge and it would all but kill the Rebels (RU) team. 

It's 2024. It doesn't matter if there are locals playing or not. The amount of NZ women you could attract to live in Melbourne with how much better the Aussie dollar is would be huge.

  • Like 1

new rise.jpg

Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Pulga said:

Melbourne. The brand is already huge and it would all but kill the Rebels (RU) team. 

It's 2024. It doesn't matter if there are locals playing or not. The amount of NZ women you could attract to live in Melbourne with how much better the Aussie dollar is would be huge.

Fair enough. I personally would hold Melbourne back until the wages are high enough so the majority or all players could be full time.

 

Edit:

Looks like the storm don't think they are quite ready for a team, but are working towards one soon:
https://www.melbournestorm.com.au/news/2024/03/28/statement-from-ceo-justin-rodski/

 

"But there is more work that needs to be done to support an elite pathway and NRLW team on and off the field. The club is working closely with the NRL and other relevant stakeholders to address the current lack of infrastructure and facilities for an elite women’s team in Melbourne"

Edited by stookie
  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, stookie said:

"But there is more work that needs to be done to support an elite pathway and NRLW team on and off the field. The club is working closely with the NRL and other relevant stakeholders to address the current lack of infrastructure and facilities for an elite women’s team in Melbourne"

Part of the pitch for public funding of the Broadmeadows COE was that it would be the base for a future Storm NRLW team.

In respect of fielding an immediately competitive team, Warriors might find recruitment difficult. A number of leading-lady Aucklanders are locked into contracts with Aussie clubs to or beyond 2025.

Should be easier for Bulldogs. Would be great to see them bring Haneen Zreika back from Giants AFLW.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Pulga said:

It's 2024. It doesn't matter if there are locals playing or not. 

Pathways were instrumental in the original 4 licences. Arguably there weren't any full-blown Sydney clubs. Dragons got in through the development of female RL in the Illawarra. Roosters likewise Central Coast.

On this basis, Bulldogs are currently head and shoulders above Storm. Like the Sharks and Tigers bids in the last expansion, too strong to deny.

  • Like 1
  • Sports Prophet changed the title to NRLW To Be The Global Elite Women’s Rugby
Posted

The continued success of the NRL this year has identified much opportunities for expansion.

I would like to see NRLW become the most financially lucrative women’s club rugby competition and raiding the likes of women’s RU 7s and club rugby divisions to bolster the growing women’s RL talent in Aus and NZ.

Maybe a women’s PNG team gets in before a men’s team does the NRL.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 hours ago, Sports Prophet said:

The continued success of the NRL this year has identified much opportunities for expansion.

I would like to see NRLW become the most financially lucrative women’s club rugby competition and raiding the likes of women’s RU 7s and club rugby divisions to bolster the growing women’s RL talent in Aus and NZ.

Maybe a women’s PNG team gets in before a men’s team does the NRL.

I think we are already seeing this to some extent. As the league grows and more money becomes involved, which inevitably will on the back of great TV ratings, then it will only get bigger and bigger.

Posted
8 minutes ago, Damien said:

I think we are already seeing this to some extent. As the league grows and more money becomes involved, which inevitably will on the back of great TV ratings, then it will only get bigger and bigger.

And with that, I feel like a sharp incline of international participants in the NRLW from nations like Canada, USA, and Brazil could help boost the overall profile in North and South America of the NRL brand as the world’s premier club rugby competition for men and women. 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Sports Prophet said:

The continued success of the NRL this year has identified much opportunities for expansion.

I would like to see NRLW become the most financially lucrative women’s club rugby competition and raiding the likes of women’s RU 7s and club rugby divisions to bolster the growing women’s RL talent in Aus and NZ.

Maybe a women’s PNG team gets in before a men’s team does the NRL.

It isn't just getting players from Rugby Union 7s and 15s, but we're seeing athletes from all sorts of sports showing interest, now there's a high-profile career pathway for those who make a success of it.

Let me never fall into the vulgar mistake of dreaming that I am persecuted whenever I am contradicted.
Ralph Waldo Emerson

Posted
On 12/06/2024 at 12:24, Sports Prophet said:

I would like to see NRLW become the most financially lucrative women’s club rugby competition and raiding the likes of women’s RU 7s 

Which implies you haven't noticed the long list of players signed from RU 7s since the launch of NRLW in 2018. 

At whatever stage someone started playing RU 7s, I would rather they had played a form of League. No more incentives to set up Union programmes in schools and universities. League contracts for League players.

Posted
1 hour ago, unapologetic pedant said:

Which implies you haven't noticed the long list of players signed from RU 7s since the launch of NRLW in 2018. 

I was implying non Aussies and Kiwis. Attracting the best talent globally.

Posted
6 hours ago, Sports Prophet said:

I was implying non Aussies and Kiwis. Attracting the best talent globally.

Same question I posed on the thread about the Titans signing a Wallaby I'd never heard of -

Why? What benefits accrue to RL from giving NRLW contracts to unknown Union 7s players, thereby robbing League players coming through League pathways of opportunities to play at the elite level of their chosen sport?

Posted
40 minutes ago, unapologetic pedant said:

Same question I posed on the thread about the Titans signing a Wallaby I'd never heard of -

Why? What benefits accrue to RL from giving NRLW contracts to unknown Union 7s players, thereby robbing League players coming through League pathways of opportunities to play at the elite level of their chosen sport?

At least the Rugby 7s girls have an experienced and fully seasoned professional background which puts them at an immediate advantage over some of the girls running around Tarsha Gale. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Sports Prophet said:

At least the Rugby 7s girls have an experienced and fully seasoned professional background which puts them at an immediate advantage over some of the girls running around Tarsha Gale. 

So the advice to Tarsha Gale Cup girls is "Go to Rugby 7s". 

Posted
4 hours ago, unapologetic pedant said:

So the advice to Tarsha Gale Cup girls is "Go to Rugby 7s". 

Don’t be ridiculous. I am advocating RL takes top talent from other sporting codes. Not average Jo’Annes.

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, unapologetic pedant said:

Same question I posed on the thread about the Titans signing a Wallaby I'd never heard of -

Why? What benefits accrue to RL from giving NRLW contracts to unknown Union 7s players, thereby robbing League players coming through League pathways of opportunities to play at the elite level of their chosen sport?

Aside from Sport Prophet's point that they actually tend to be good athletes from a full time environment, it also builds the aura of the NRLW being an amazing competition that is drawing in all kinds due to its awesomeness.

Emma Tonegato actually played for the Jillaroos early in her career before moving to sevens, but almost all mention of her past is that she won the gold medal at the Olympics.

Does it matter that Sheridan Gallagher moved from the junior Matildas to playing RL in any significant practical way? Almost certainly not, but it's a massive "feel-good story" for RL.

Repeat for women's bobsled, AFL defectors etc, etc, and it's just a massively positive narrative for the sport in general and the women's game in particular.

 

Back to Sport Prophet's point, I don't think it matters so much in Australia, but it is a fantastic thing that top RU women in New Zealand are moving to RL due to the NRLW. We have also seen some extent of impact with players from Brazil, Canada, France, the US, obviously the UK, trying their hand at getting an NRLW contract.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.