Jump to content

Three match ban


Recommended Posts


But nothing for Mr Magoo?  Not that I'm bothered as we really need Wigan to give Toulouse a good towelling next week. 

Surprising though. 🤔

This world was never meant for one as beautiful as me.
 
 
Wakefield Trinity RLFC
2012 - 2014 "The wasted years"

2013, 2014 & 2015 Official Magic Weekend "Whipping Boys"

2017 - The year the dream disappeared under Grix's left foot.

2018 - The FinniChezz Bromance 

2019 - The Return of the Prodigal Son

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jughead said:

Similar weighted “techniques” have been discussed a fair amount in the NRL lately and coming down heavily on players is the right way to go. 

Very apt wording...

That's a 3 game ban, I can't see how anyone can question it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Davo5 said:

The sport really needs to stamp out these kind of tackles,can’t really understand how anyone can think 3 games is harsh.

It’s harsh because the RFL are picking on my team again is the real reason

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Chris22 said:

No. Are you familiar with the action a pair of scissors make?

Yes. It's not a scissor tackle.

Body weight is dropped on the legs, but not in a scissor action.

Have another look, then come back and retract your comment.

Edited by dboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, dboy said:

Yes. It's not a scissor tackle.

Body weight is dropped on the legs, but not in a scissor action.

Have another look, then come back and retract your comment.

Still a shocker of a tackle that deserves the 3 game ban.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davo5 said:

And the hip drop wasn’t deliberate ?

I don't believe so, no, not at all - but that doesn't change the fact it's a foul action.

I have no issue if you think it was though (well done for reading KTs mind BTW).

What is indisputable though, is that it's not a scissor tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, dboy said:

I don't believe so, no, not at all - but that doesn't change the fact it's a foul action.

I have no issue if you think it was though (well done for reading KTs mind BTW).

What is indisputable though, is that it's not a scissor tackle.

I think what is indisputable is that you really can’t handle any criticism of anything Wakefield,not a good trait to have on a RL discussion forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davo5 said:

I think what is indisputable is that you really can’t handle any criticism of anything Wakefield,not a good trait to have on a RL discussion forum.

How do you figure that?

I've stated it's a foul action. It deserves a ban I'm sure.

What's not a good trait is to state something blatantly untrue.

It's not a scissor tackle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.