Jump to content

IMG


haskey

Recommended Posts

I had a survey from IMG on my laptop . which I completed . A little slanted to SL with their questions . But they are starting on the right lines, methinks

Link to comment
Share on other sites


17 minutes ago, haskey said:

I had a survey from IMG on my laptop . which I completed . A little slanted to SL with their questions . But they are starting on the right lines, methinks

Had the same. I hope things go well, there is plenty fo scope for improvement in lots of areas atm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, David Shepherd said:

Done mine.

They seem to be pushing this bloody 2 x 10 thing. That'll mean playing each team a minimum of 3 times a year. Might get a bit boring seeing the same old teams over and over again.

On the other hand, it's more matches against teams of similar standards, and then would be less of a jump to go from this league into the top league.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, David Shepherd said:

Done mine.

They seem to be pushing this bloody 2 x 10 thing. That'll mean playing each team a minimum of 3 times a year. Might get a bit boring seeing the same old teams over and over again.

To be fair though D they did ask how many teams you wanted in SL and assume all FEV fans would have picked 14🤣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, POR said:

To be fair though D they did ask how many teams you wanted in SL and assume all FEV fans would have picked 14🤣

True, I went for 16 myself.

Although I'd guess that a 2 x 10 scenario is designed to get 20 full time teams, we'd probably always be in the 2nd div, but we'd have a better chance in the cup.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, David Shepherd said:

 

Although I'd guess that a 2 x 10 scenario is designed to get 20 full time teams, 

THAT scenario always makes me laugh  20 full time teams where are theses 20 coming from

thunder who have a weaalthy owner have just pulled the plug  unless it's a twenty split in sky money which the incumbents won't agree to then 20 full time teams is a figment of their imagination 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, POR said:

THAT scenario always makes me laugh  20 full time teams where are theses 20 coming from

thunder who have a weaalthy owner have just pulled the plug  unless it's a twenty split in sky money which the incumbents won't agree to then 20 full time teams is a figment of their imagination 

Someone on the main forum worked out that the top 10 would get about £2m and the bottom 10 would get about £1m each.

Can't remember the exact figures but it looked pretty plausible. Would certainly help to bridge the gap between the leagues.

But playing each other 3 times will be mighty dull

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, David Shepherd said:

Someone on the main forum worked out that the top 10 would get about £2m and the bottom 10 would get about £1m each.

Can't remember the exact figures but it looked pretty plausible. Would certainly help to bridge the gap between the leagues.

But playing each other 3 times will be mighty dull

How much would the teams outside the top 20 get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.