Oxford Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 44 minutes ago, Barley Mow said: So my off the wall alternative would be for clubs to get the amount of central funding received based on their grading. The higher the grade, the higher the amount of funding. For most clubs this would be a great incentive to improve, and with that increased funding on field success and promotion is likely to follow. Interesting idea, but if a club is assured a cat A and does nothing new why would you reward inactivity? If the aim is not just maintaining an unbalanced status quo the perfect way to do just that is to give more money to those clubs that already have more. In all of this debate not only has it been assumed some clubs are not improving but also that they're not trying to improve. 1 2 warning points Non-Political Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now