JohnM Posted February 28 Posted February 28 Not " Cherchez la femme" but maybe it should be "Cherchez le vendeur de double vitrage." The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and achievements,
Archie Gordon Posted February 28 Posted February 28 Both sides seem to want an independent review of governance. One side wants Johnson gone immediately, the other says wait 6 months for that. The differences seem paper thin here. 3
sweaty craiq Posted February 28 Posted February 28 2 hours ago, Archie Gordon said: Both sides seem to want an independent review of governance. One side wants Johnson gone immediately, the other says wait 6 months for that. The differences seem paper thin here. Too much at stake to have him around in the next 6 months - pay him up and garden leave
Dave T Posted February 28 Posted February 28 18 minutes ago, sweaty craiq said: Too much at stake to have him around in the next 6 months - pay him up and garden leave Like what? What's at stake? Or are you just following the party line? 4
RigbyLuger Posted February 28 Posted February 28 I'd love someone to explain what Johnson has done in his role that necessitates this, and not, say Sutton as the target. 4
Toby Chopra Posted February 28 Posted February 28 1 hour ago, sweaty craiq said: Too much at stake to have him around in the next 6 months - pay him up and garden leave What needs to happen in the next six months? 1
PREPOSTEROUS Posted February 28 Posted February 28 34 minutes ago, RigbyLuger said: I'd love someone to explain what Johnson has done in his role that necessitates this, and not, say Sutton as the target. From the outside looking in, it seems to be more what he hasn't done. Same for Sutton. For the games leaderships, they are pretty anonymous. 2
RigbyLuger Posted February 28 Posted February 28 25 minutes ago, Archie Gordon said: It's now just a 404 error. Not much of an exclusive if you can't read it.
Toby Chopra Posted February 28 Posted February 28 9 minutes ago, PREPOSTEROUS said: From the outside looking in, it seems to be more what he hasn't done. Same for Sutton. For the games leaderships, they are pretty anonymous. Is the chairman of the NGB any less anonymous in other sports? The first time I'd heard of the RFU chairman was when he resigned over the size of his bonus and I just had to Google who was the chair of the FA. We're a club-led sport and the significant decisions, and crucially the promotion of the sport, are taken by them, through RLCom and SL. I suppose that does make the case for whether we need the RFL board constituted and remunerated the way it is. Perhaps this really is about short term penny pinching until a more slimline structure replaces it. Although I just checked and Simon Johnson was only paid 40k last year so it's hardly going to make a difference. 2
sweaty craiq Posted February 28 Posted February 28 2 hours ago, Dave T said: Like what? What's at stake? Or are you just following the party line? I also do weddings and wakes
Tommygilf Posted February 28 Posted February 28 4 hours ago, RigbyLuger said: I'd love someone to explain what Johnson has done in his role that necessitates this, and not, say Sutton as the target. I agree, though I think the Salford saga has perhaps called into question the degree and quality of stewardship exerted by the RFL. 3
JohnM Posted February 28 Posted February 28 (edited) 4 hours ago, Toby Chopra said: What needs to happen in the next six months? Beaumont needs to shut up and grow up. If the RFL can investigate SRD for bringing the game into disrepute, they should do the same with Beaumont. Edited February 28 by JohnM 1 The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and achievements,
thecoffeeman Posted February 28 Posted February 28 Apologies for joining in after such a long absence but knowing Tanker, THIS thread may be a clue why he wants back in. He's only really interested in £££. He'll be negotiating himself a decent % slice of the deal.
lucky 7 Posted March 1 Posted March 1 On 11/02/2025 at 20:34, The 4 of Us said: https://inews.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/super-league-clubs-plot-coup-oust-rfl-chief-3529855 The RFL warns clubs.
sweaty craiq Posted March 2 Posted March 2 On 28/02/2025 at 14:00, Toby Chopra said: What needs to happen in the next six months? Sure we have an Ashes series
JohnM Posted March 4 Posted March 4 Beaumont has now accused the RFL of being "disingenuous " My, isn't that a big word for Leigh's very own Donald Trump. Disingenuous: behaviour that is lacking in candor or slightly dishonest, often giving a false appearance of sincerity or straightforwardness. It describes a person who is not completely honest or sincere, often pretending to know less about something than they actually do. Synonyms include dishonest, deceitful, and hypocritical. The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and achievements,
JohnM Posted March 4 Posted March 4 On 28/02/2025 at 14:00, Toby Chopra said: What needs to happen in the next six months? What needs to happen? Beaumont needs to set up his Ultimate Rugby League, preferably on the island of South Georgia. 1 The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and achievements,
Worzel Posted March 4 Posted March 4 On 28/02/2025 at 14:06, Archie Gordon said: It's now just a 404 error. Is that a metaphor for the sport in the UK? 2
Archie Gordon Posted March 4 Posted March 4 26 minutes ago, Worzel said: Is that a metaphor for the sport in the UK? Or it could be Salford's new sponsor. 3
Dave T Posted March 4 Posted March 4 6 hours ago, JohnM said: Beaumont has now accused the RFL of being "disingenuous " My, isn't that a big word for Leigh's very own Donald Trump. Disingenuous: behaviour that is lacking in candor or slightly dishonest, often giving a false appearance of sincerity or straightforwardness. It describes a person who is not completely honest or sincere, often pretending to know less about something than they actually do. Synonyms include dishonest, deceitful, and hypocritical. Without moving into politics, it was interesting that this letter went down the Project Fear route, referring to government referendums.
Dave T Posted March 4 Posted March 4 I thought Wood was treated unfairly at times, I don't think he was anywhere near as bad as others, but he left the role, with a huge payoff and is now at Bradford. We've moved on. Anyone who thinks DB is some kind of visionary based on this letter and move wants their bumps felt. 2 1
JohnM Posted March 4 Posted March 4 14 minutes ago, Dave T said: Without moving into politics, it was interesting that this letter went down the Project Fear route, referring to government referendums. I didn't get that far. Beaumont is my trigger word and I had to scrabble for my inhaler. (letter value = 10 ) The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and achievements,
phiggins Posted March 4 Posted March 4 44 minutes ago, Dave T said: Without moving into politics, it was interesting that this letter went down the Project Fear route, referring to government referendums. Pretty poor for him to go down that route I think. But the claims and counter claims from the RFL and Beaumont should include a number of things that are easily fact checked. Of course, the journalist to publish the letters hasn't bothered to do it, but the clubs that have been written to, will need to do make sure that they are clear of the facts. Unfortunately, with Beaumont, you always have to cut through the bluster, but there will be some valid points sat behind all of that. I don't know enough on the RFL resolutions and the Leigh / Batley resolution to comment on a preference, but the Salford debacle does show that we have a governing body that is incapable of governing. So something needs to be done. 1
RigbyLuger Posted March 4 Posted March 4 4 minutes ago, phiggins said: Pretty poor for him to go down that route I think. But the claims and counter claims from the RFL and Beaumont should include a number of things that are easily fact checked. Of course, the journalist to publish the letters hasn't bothered to do it, but the clubs that have been written to, will need to do make sure that they are clear of the facts. The lack of pushback or fact checking from journalists whenever Beaumont says something disprovable is a disgrace. 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now