Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Not " Cherchez la femme"  but maybe it should be "Cherchez le vendeur de double vitrage."

The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 

Posted
2 hours ago, Archie Gordon said:

Both sides seem to want an independent review of governance. One side wants Johnson gone immediately, the other says wait 6 months for that. The differences seem paper thin here.

Too much at stake to have him around in the next 6 months - pay him up and garden leave

Posted
18 minutes ago, sweaty craiq said:

Too much at stake to have him around in the next 6 months - pay him up and garden leave

Like what? What's at stake?

Or are you just following the party line?

  • Like 4
Posted
1 hour ago, sweaty craiq said:

Too much at stake to have him around in the next 6 months - pay him up and garden leave

What needs to happen in the next six months? 

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, RigbyLuger said:

I'd love someone to explain what Johnson has done in his role that necessitates this, and not, say Sutton as the target.

From the outside looking in, it seems to be more what he hasn't done. Same for Sutton. For the games leaderships, they are pretty anonymous. 

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, PREPOSTEROUS said:

From the outside looking in, it seems to be more what he hasn't done. Same for Sutton. For the games leaderships, they are pretty anonymous. 

Is the chairman of the NGB any less anonymous in other sports? The first time I'd heard of the RFU chairman was when he resigned over the size of his bonus and I just had to Google who was the chair of the FA. 

We're a club-led sport and the significant decisions, and crucially the promotion of the sport, are taken by them, through RLCom and SL. 

I suppose that does make the case for whether we need the RFL board constituted and remunerated the way it is. Perhaps this really is about short term penny pinching until a more slimline structure replaces it.

Although I just checked and Simon Johnson was only paid 40k last year so it's hardly going to make a difference.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, RigbyLuger said:

I'd love someone to explain what Johnson has done in his role that necessitates this, and not, say Sutton as the target.

I agree, though I think the Salford saga has perhaps called into question the degree and quality of stewardship exerted by the RFL. 

  • Like 3
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, Toby Chopra said:

What needs to happen in the next six months? 

Beaumont needs to shut up and grow up.

If the RFL can investigate SRD for bringing the game into disrepute, they should do the same with Beaumont.

Edited by JohnM
  • Like 1
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted

Apologies for joining in after such a long absence but knowing Tanker, THIS thread may be a clue why he wants back in.

He's only really interested in £££. 

He'll be negotiating himself a decent % slice of the deal. 

Posted

Beaumont has now accused the RFL of being "disingenuous " My, isn't that a big word  for Leigh's very own Donald Trump.

Disingenuous: behaviour that is lacking in candor or slightly dishonest, often giving a false appearance of sincerity or straightforwardness. It describes a person who is not completely honest or sincere, often pretending to know less about something than they actually do. Synonyms include dishonest, deceitful, and hypocritical.

 

The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
On 28/02/2025 at 14:00, Toby Chopra said:

What needs to happen in the next six months? 

What needs to happen? Beaumont needs to set up his Ultimate Rugby League, preferably on the  island of South Georgia. 

  • Like 1
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
On 28/02/2025 at 14:06, Archie Gordon said:

It's now just a 404 error.

Is that a metaphor for the sport in the UK? 

  • Haha 2
Posted
6 hours ago, JohnM said:

Beaumont has now accused the RFL of being "disingenuous " My, isn't that a big word  for Leigh's very own Donald Trump.

Disingenuous: behaviour that is lacking in candor or slightly dishonest, often giving a false appearance of sincerity or straightforwardness. It describes a person who is not completely honest or sincere, often pretending to know less about something than they actually do. Synonyms include dishonest, deceitful, and hypocritical.

 

Without moving into politics, it was interesting that this letter went down the Project Fear route, referring to government referendums.

Posted

I thought Wood was treated unfairly at times, I don't think he was anywhere near as bad as others, but he left the role, with a huge payoff and is now at Bradford. We've moved on.

Anyone who thinks DB is some kind of visionary based on this letter and move wants their bumps felt.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, Dave T said:

Without moving into politics, it was interesting that this letter went down the Project Fear route, referring to government referendums.

I didn't get that far. Beaumont is my trigger word and I had to scrabble for my inhaler. (letter value = 10 🙂)

The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
44 minutes ago, Dave T said:

Without moving into politics, it was interesting that this letter went down the Project Fear route, referring to government referendums.

Pretty poor for him to go down that route I think. But the claims and counter claims from the RFL and Beaumont should include a number of things that are easily fact checked. Of course, the journalist to publish the letters hasn't bothered to do it, but the clubs that have been written to, will need to do make sure that they are clear of the facts.

Unfortunately, with Beaumont, you always have to cut through the bluster, but there will be some valid points sat behind all of that. I don't know enough on the RFL resolutions and the Leigh / Batley resolution to comment on a preference, but the Salford debacle does show that we have a governing body that is incapable of governing. So something needs to be done.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, phiggins said:

Pretty poor for him to go down that route I think. But the claims and counter claims from the RFL and Beaumont should include a number of things that are easily fact checked. Of course, the journalist to publish the letters hasn't bothered to do it, but the clubs that have been written to, will need to do make sure that they are clear of the facts.

The lack of pushback or fact checking from journalists whenever Beaumont says something disprovable is a disgrace.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.