Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
41 minutes ago, Gav Wilson said:

 

That's that then!

I lost all respect for Mazey when he had a go at those on furlough having BBQs etc. The chickens will come home to roost for this lot one day.

  • Like 5

Posted
1 hour ago, RigbyLuger said:

I lost all respect for Mazey when he had a go at those on furlough having BBQs etc. The chickens will come home to roost for this lot one day.

Reading this, this Mazey guy comes over like a poor man's answer to Derek Beaumont, but without the smart, suave, sophisticated way with words. 😄

The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
4 hours ago, JohnM said:

Thanks for that. However Jo Draper is not an NED. She's an Observer. I'm not convinced the NEDs nor the two Observers are seeing what's going on. Of course, if the junta would publish the minutes, we could see who was in attendance and what was discussed.

What entitles you to see the minutes?

 

"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

Posted
2 hours ago, RigbyLuger said:

I lost all respect for Mazey when he had a go at those on furlough having BBQs etc. The chickens will come home to roost for this lot one day.

BBQ chickens?

  • Haha 2

"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

Posted

Given the total disregard for the finer details of sports governance from the current RL owners, along with everything else, I'm starting to think that its entirely possible they just didn't read the full details of the IMG deal...

  • Like 6
  • Haha 4
Posted
13 hours ago, JohnM said:

Reading this, this Mazey guy comes over like a poor man's answer to Derek Beaumont, but without the smart, suave, sophisticated way with words. 😄

Not sure about Derek Beaumont, but reading that he comes across as a poor mans Yoda.

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Tommygilf said:

Given the total disregard for the finer details of sports governance from the current RL owners, along with everything else, I'm starting to think that its entirely possible they just didn't read the full details of the IMG deal...

There is a certain type of confident business person or politician who ends up making the fatal assumption that the thing they've superficially read must go in their favour because they have been successful in besting people before. In broad strokes, they never like consensus (someone has to lose) and they don't trust the kind of pencil pushers who read the small print that they do actually need.

Now, how could one possibly believe that of the current crop of RL leaders?

  • Haha 3

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Posted

Yeh but no but yeh, it's a local game for local people. We make our own rules up as we go along.

  • Sad 1
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
1 hour ago, gingerjon said:

There is a certain type of confident business person or politician who ends up making the fatal assumption that the thing they've superficially read must go in their favour because they have been successful in besting people before. In broad strokes, they never like consensus (someone has to lose) and they don't trust the kind of pencil pushers who read the small print that they do actually need.

Now, how could one possibly believe that of the current crop of RL leaders?

In a past life I worked for these sorts of people in a more pencil pushing role; essentially started saying "no" more than "how high" eventually because you can't just shout and bully your way through these things.

Hughes moving to Wimbledon and doing nothing else because duh London will get a licence must be the most frustrating example of this in RL land recently for the expansionists among us. There's plenty of others...

  • Like 7
Posted
On 02/05/2025 at 12:41, Archie Gordon said:

Magic Weekend, CCSFs, CCFs day - all going to be overshadowed by gossip around a strategic review held at the least strategic time imaginable. Idiots. Just idiots.

It won’t be a strategic review anyway. That would involve looking at the whole sport in England. It won’t happen. It’ll be a structure review. Again. 

On 03/05/2025 at 06:05, Tommygilf said:

I'm starting to think that its entirely possible they just didn't read the full details of the IMG deal...

I wouldn’t joke about that. Some RL folk in power make Andrew Brigden look competent. 

Posted (edited)

 The question of "if a club-led review takes place in the forest and no one hears it, does it make a sound?" explores the relationship between perception and reality.

1. Philosophical perspective: It suggests that sound may not exist without a perceiver; if no one is there to hear it, then sound, as a conscious experience, does not occur. 

2. Scientific Perspective: From a scientific standpoint, sound is defined as a mechanical wave that propagates through a medium. Therefore, the club-led review  does create sound waves when it takes place regardless of whether anyone is there to hear it.

3. Conclusion?

Edited by JohnM
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted

My question would be how many of the Strategic Review lot attended the Magic Weekend @ Newcastle?

Will the Batley chair take umbrage at not being able to establish this important fact?

  • Haha 4

     No reserves,but resilience,persistence and determination are omnipotent.                       

Posted
5 minutes ago, Angelic Cynic said:

My question would be how many of the Strategic Review lot attended the Magic Weekend @ Newcastle?

Will the Batley chair take umbrage at not being able to establish this important fact?

And if they did, how much did they cost the sport in tickets, food and drinks?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, RigbyLuger said:

And if they did, how much did they cost the sport in tickets, food and drinks?

I have it on good authority that the Puppet Master paid for the pork scratchings.

Edited by JohnM
  • Haha 1
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
On 04/05/2025 at 14:55, GeordieSaint said:

It won’t be a strategic review anyway. That would involve looking at the whole sport in England. It won’t happen. It’ll be a structure review. Again. 

I wouldn’t joke about that. Some RL folk in power make Andrew Brigden look competent. 

I am not sure how it could be a strategic review anyway, that would imply there is a strategy to review in the first place.. not seen any sign of one of them for quite a while!

  • Haha 2
Posted

Fortunately, there have been, there are currently, and in future, some great games, with lots of TV coverage: Sky, BBC, the Sportsman. More than ever before.

It's almost as if we don't actually need a club-led review after all.

  • Like 4
The "Dark Ages" is a term referring to life at the RFL under the new regime. It's characterized by a decline in openness, professionalism, transparency and  achievements, 
 
Posted
1 hour ago, Archie Gordon said:

At least RFL strategy is no longer a 404 error. But it seems that a 404 error is still the (interim) RFL Chair. Fun times!

Its the most effective one we have had for a while!

  • Haha 3
Posted

Its really good that the RFL media are also asking questions of them, I mean its every day we hear about the lack of communications from them....oh wait, no, sorry, got that wrong, I`ll try again.

Its none of the days we hear about the lack of communications from them.

  • Like 3
Posted
7 minutes ago, RigbyLuger said:

Some communication, but not from anyone on the board anymore 🤣

 

 

If hes telling the truth then thats exactly as some of us expected, certain club owners and members are basically taking control, this independent board is a complete sham. Sickening really.

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.