DoubleD Posted April 16 Posted April 16 If only we got this type of analysis in SL https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXLo9FjEeec/?igsh=d3IwMTZ6Njh3cGd0
V02 Posted April 17 Posted April 17 11 hours ago, DoubleD said: If only we got this type of analysis in SL https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXLo9FjEeec/?igsh=d3IwMTZ6Njh3cGd0 Take a look at Tackle University on your chosen social media site! 1 1
Dave T Posted April 17 Posted April 17 Its a real shame that we appear to have abandoned the touch screen post-match stuff now. That could be very basic at times, particularly when you had a player stood there cold on their kit, but at times it was very good. 5
Click Posted April 17 Posted April 17 4 hours ago, Dave T said: Its a real shame that we appear to have abandoned the touch screen post-match stuff now. That could be very basic at times, particularly when you had a player stood there cold on their kit, but at times it was very good. Wells was very good at breaking down plays on that touch screen 3
Just Browny Posted April 17 Posted April 17 5 hours ago, Dave T said: Its a real shame that we appear to have abandoned the touch screen post-match stuff now. That could be very basic at times, particularly when you had a player stood there cold on their kit, but at times it was very good. I like that you were concerned about the warmth of the players. 1 I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.
hunsletgreenandgold Posted April 17 Posted April 17 Tactics/playing structures is something we just don't do enough analysis around....if at all?! It's something the other code do very well, especially on attack. Guess what kind of tactics and shape they take inspiration (copy is more accurate) from? But we're not highlighting it in our own game so it's not like we can complain.
DoubleD Posted May 4 Author Posted May 4 https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX53v4BhCD5/?igsh=MXFqbzlkOTd0bHZiMQ== Another great insight from the Wahs game
Dunbar Posted May 4 Posted May 4 2 hours ago, DoubleD said: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX53v4BhCD5/?igsh=MXFqbzlkOTd0bHZiMQ== Another great insight from the Wahs game This is why it frustrates me that people call Rugby League a simple game. The laws of the game may be relatively simple but a strategic plan permeates through the game and tactical decisions are made in every set of six and almost every play. I don't know why, as a sport, we don't want to showcase this. 1 "The history of the world is the history of the triumph of the heartless over the mindless." — Sir Humphrey Appleby. "If someone doesn't value evidence, what evidence are you going to provide to prove that they should value it? If someone doesn't value logic, what logical argument could you provide to show the importance of logic?" — Sam Harris
EagleEyePie Posted May 4 Posted May 4 2 hours ago, Dunbar said: This is why it frustrates me that people call Rugby League a simple game. The laws of the game may be relatively simple but a strategic plan permeates through the game and tactical decisions are made in every set of six and almost every play. I don't know why, as a sport, we don't want to showcase this. I feel like we get a dumbed down approach to analysis because some important people somewhere are convinced that we need to present the game as simply as possible for the mythical viewers at home (© Brian Noble) that have accidentally stumbled upon rugby league for the first time and are sat scratching their heads, thumbs poised on the remote about to change channels, until someone thoroughly underexplains an important aspect of the game. Oh the big boppers bashed them did they Barrie? Thanks for the insight. I was worried there might be a thought process involved for a second. It's like there's a fear that analysis would turn people away, yet every other sport seems to recognise that providing the detail and exploring strategy is just an example of professional sports presentation. Nothing irritates me more than the dumbing down of RL by those involved in it's presentation. 6
RigbyLuger Posted May 4 Posted May 4 16 minutes ago, EagleEyePie said: Nothing irritates me more than the dumbing down of RL by those involved in it's presentation. I'll eat my shoes in a world where everything seems to be designed for a clickbaity clip.
Spidey Posted May 4 Posted May 4 On 17/04/2026 at 07:28, Dave T said: Its a real shame that we appear to have abandoned the touch screen post-match stuff now. That could be very basic at times, particularly when you had a player stood there cold on their kit, but at times it was very good. It was a better use of Wells than him being on commentary 5
V02 Posted May 4 Posted May 4 Two great examples of what is possible here: https://www.instagram.com/p/DXFlRDRjQ7S/?igsh=MTQ2MWZlNXI4NmNpYg== https://www.instagram.com/p/DXpicnhjZc4/?igsh=NXZ3bDZrMzA1anl5 I think you get some brief mentions of stuff like this but never with any of the depth shown in the links. The game is far more complex than people give it credit for!
welshmagpie Posted May 4 Posted May 4 I really appreciated Paul Rowley anytime he popped up on co-commentary, he’s really take time to explain attacking sets - putting into words the direction of the attack and its intentions player by player. Good stuff. Agree about missing Wells and his screen. 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now