Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Strong suggestion here that the York/Newcastle model is going to become more of a default if not a formality next year in the Championship.

  • Like 2

Posted
52 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

Strong suggestion here that the York/Newcastle model is going to become more of a default if not a formality next year in the Championship.

Personally I don’t like it and it will see a lot of semi pro players out of a job. But it’s a easy model for the rfl 

Posted
57 minutes ago, hunsletgreenandgold said:

Is this 'model' much different to NRL teams links with NSW/QLD Cup sides? 

It’s pretty much the same. Just a very different culture. The nsw cup clubs are pretty much just reserves with no fan bases. Qld cup is a bit different 

Posted
3 hours ago, Charlie said:

Personally I don’t like it and it will see a lot of semi pro players out of a job. But it’s a easy model for the rfl 

Better utilisation of the player pool we have should create more scope for more clubs and as such more semi pro opportunities

Posted

Another idea to save super league clubs a couple of quid, and further reduce the English player pool.

Super league clubs should have full a teams .

I watched rl for 40 years who do I want to watch players who change ever week just to keep them fit for superleague, could championship team have always had a strong local contingent,  why would a local lad who want to play rugby play for a club that when it suits the super league team he will be stood down..team spirt none existent as will be the support, he just play with his mates in amateur ranks

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 2
Posted
17 minutes ago, barrowrugbyfan said:

Another idea to save super league clubs a couple of quid, and further reduce the English player pool.

Super league clubs should have full a teams .

I watched rl for 40 years who do I want to watch players who change ever week just to keep them fit for superleague, could championship team have always had a strong local contingent,  why would a local lad who want to play rugby play for a club that when it suits the super league team he will be stood down..team spirt none existent as will be the support, he just play with his mates in amateur ranks

I guess the problem is, and we see this in lots of sports, is what if the A Team league is worse than the 2nd Division?

Posted
1 hour ago, dufftown1 said:

Better utilisation of the player pool we have should create more scope for more clubs and as such more semi pro opportunities

It will force a lot of semi pro players out of the game as sl clubs will just play there reserves there. Off course the better semi pros will still get clubs. 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Charlie said:

It will force a lot of semi pro players out of the game as sl clubs will just play there reserves there. Off course the better semi pros will still get clubs. 

Tbf, semi pro players are being forced out of the game now with a reduction from 28 Championship and League 1 clubs to just 20 in a decade. 

Posted
19 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

Tbf, semi pro players are being forced out of the game now with a reduction from 28 Championship and League 1 clubs to just 20 in a decade. 

Your right and more will be gone 

Posted
56 minutes ago, Charlie said:

It will force a lot of semi pro players out of the game as sl clubs will just play there reserves there. Off course the better semi pros will still get clubs. 

Not if we have more semi-pro sides

Posted
17 minutes ago, dufftown1 said:

Not if we have more semi-pro sides

Why would we have more? There’s no signs of this happening. less is more likely 

Posted

I suspect the difference in revenue between SL and Champ makes it more financially beneficial for a player to sit in the stands at a SL club than play at a Champ one. Here is an option that is worth exploring - give more central funding to the Champ clubs so they can attract the players.  It also closes the gap, which would allow teams to move easier between SL and the Champ.  And therein lies the problem, clubs who are in SL, understandably, don’t want to see this happen so will never agree to it.  This is why a governing body needs to be making decisions based on what is best for the sport.

  • Like 8
Posted
5 hours ago, Charlie said:

It’s pretty much the same. Just a very different culture. The nsw cup clubs are pretty much just reserves with no fan bases. Qld cup is a bit different 

image.jpeg.f459ba9c280c92605045c11466b10abf.jpeg

 

Newtown Jets might just disagree with you there, buddy.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The stated ambition was to increase standards at the top, but the result of all the recent changes has just been to kill off any sort of 2nd tier competition. Can't get relegated if there is no 2nd division!
1iw40c.jpg

Posted
5 hours ago, Charlie said:

It’s pretty much the same. Just a very different culture. The nsw cup clubs are pretty much just reserves with no fan bases. Qld cup is a bit different 

And North Sydney aren't far behind, either.
 

2cf02944f98803fe6a3074e63ed013d1.jpeg

  • Like 3
Posted
49 minutes ago, Billy King's Boots said:

And North Sydney aren't far behind, either.
 

2cf02944f98803fe6a3074e63ed013d1.jpeg

North Sydney and Newtown are exactly what Championship clubs should be aiming for.

new rise.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, Billy King's Boots said:

image.jpeg.f459ba9c280c92605045c11466b10abf.jpeg

 

Newtown Jets might just disagree with you there, buddy.

 

1 hour ago, Billy King's Boots said:

And North Sydney aren't far behind, either.
 

2cf02944f98803fe6a3074e63ed013d1.jpeg

Both examples are pretty disingenuous. Im pretty sure neither Newtown or Norths look like this for anymore than perhaps two regular season matches a year.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Prince said:

I suspect the difference in revenue between SL and Champ makes it more financially beneficial for a player to sit in the stands at a SL club than play at a Champ one. Here is an option that is worth exploring - give more central funding to the Champ clubs so they can attract the players.  It also closes the gap, which would allow teams to move easier between SL and the Champ.  And therein lies the problem, clubs who are in SL, understandably, don’t want to see this happen so will never agree to it.  This is why a governing body needs to be making decisions based on what is best for the sport.

That funding has to come from somewhere.

The Championship (and previously League 1) was funded, significantly, by the larger SL deal. That money was used to prop up massive wage inflation but did not give a return in making such funding levels sustainable - either by increased attendances or a TV Deal supplementing that income. 

That SL TV deal went down and so did that funding accordingly - though notably Championship clubs decided that it would be better for League 1 clubs to first take the massive hits in that respect. That move ultimately destroyed that League.

Posted

If championship club that gets 1,500+ through the gate and a secure ground that's affordable, I can see lots of reasons they'd say  "No thanks".

I can see no reason why they can't compete alongside clubs that have gone into partnership with SL clubs.

What you don't want is a partner who just uses the club as a place to keep fringe players match-fit - you want them to bring in sponsors, help with marketing and viral, help with coaching and S&C resource. 

  • Like 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Pulga said:

North Sydney and Newtown are exactly what Championship clubs should be aiming for.

The last average attendance I can find for North Sydney was 1800, lets not pretend these are crowds are greatly different. I cant find any accurate data on Newtown.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Damien said:

The last average attendance I can find for North Sydney was 1800, lets not pretend these are crowds are greatly different. I cant find any accurate data on Newtown.

I assumed that, as 'what Championship clubs should aim for', he meant that they could be the rumoured relocation site for any ailing Super League club - like North Sydney are.

I can confirm 30+ less sales for Scotland vs Italy at Workington, after this afternoons test purchase for the Tonga match, £7.50 is extremely reasonable, however a £2.50 'delivery' fee for a walk in purchase is beyond taking the mickey, good luck with that, it's cheaper on the telly.

Posted

North Sydney are financially supported by the Norths organisation which owns and runs multiple clubs in NSW. That includes the very successful Twin Towns club in Tweed Heads which is in Titans’s territory. Titans don’t have a leagues club…simply an affiliation with a golf club in Southport, miles away from Robina where they play.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.