Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could be total b.s but seen a couple of posts on Twitter suggesting they are having financial issues.

Has anyone else heard anything?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Posted
35 minutes ago, The Daddy said:

Could be total b.s but seen a couple of posts on Twitter suggesting they are having financial issues.

Has anyone else heard anything?

 

8 minutes ago, Damien said:

Any links to these couple of posts?

 

There was a RUMOUR a few weeks ago that a Super League club some financial issues, but i didn't think it was York, and still don't.

  • Like 1
Posted

I don't know if there is any truth in the matter but it wouldn't be a big shock of any of the 3 new teams were struggling considering the reduced funding they get and potential for lower revenue than expected. 

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Posted
Just now, OriginalMrC said:

I don't know if there is any truth in the matter but it wouldn't be a big shock of any of the 3 new teams were struggling considering the reduced funding they get and potential for lower revenue than expected. 

I thought Bradford got full funding.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, OriginalMrC said:

I don't know if there is any truth in the matter but it wouldn't be a big shock of any of the 3 new teams were struggling considering the reduced funding they get and potential for lower revenue than expected. 

Only 2 of them are on reduced funding, but it’s a fair point. If either York or Toulouse have budgeted for income that hasn’t come as part of their application then they will struggle. It would also make a mockery of the decision to go to 14 as well.

  • Like 4
Posted

On top of the reduced funding. Toulouse are paying other clubs’ travel costs. So if they’re not in financial bother now, they will be if this funding model continues, as it’s completely unsustainable 

  • Like 14
  • Thanks 2
Posted
13 minutes ago, phiggins said:

Only 2 of them are on reduced funding, but it’s a fair point. If either York or Toulouse have budgeted for income that hasn’t come as part of their application then they will struggle. It would also make a mockery of the decision to go to 14 as well.

It was very important we had a coup, which led to this. 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, RigbyLuger said:

It was very important we had a coup, which led to this. 

But it has to be said, this thread is about Twitter rumours. So very possible that ‘this’ doesn’t even exist.

But one motivator behind the coup is a lack of finance, so financial troubles shouldn’t be a surprise. 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, The Daddy said:

Could be total b.s but seen a couple of posts on Twitter suggesting they are having financial issues.

Has anyone else heard anything?

Don't worry - Newcastle will bail them out.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 10

Sport, amongst other things, is a dream-world offering escape from harsh reality and the disturbing prospect of change.

Posted

There was a suggestion that they hadn’t their players on time last month, but it’s just unconfirmed speculation.

I’m not prejudiced, I hate everybody equally

Posted
2 minutes ago, Blind side johnny said:

Don't worry - Newcastle will bail them out.

Newcastle will have a 5 man squad next year on their £250k salary cap.

  • Haha 7

I’m not prejudiced, I hate everybody equally

Posted
13 minutes ago, Derwent said:

Newcastle will have a 5 man squad next year on their £250k salary cap.

You'd expect existing contracts to be honoured.  But I've not seen the detail on how this cap is to be calculated.  I doubt if, for instance, there'll be a penalty for winning too many games, otherwise clubs will be given an incentive to deliberately lose.

"We'll sell you a seat .... but you'll only need the edge of it!"

Posted
21 minutes ago, Derwent said:

There was a suggestion that they hadn’t their players on time last month, but it’s just unconfirmed speculation.

Yep, that is what I heard. But as you say could just be b.s. 

Posted
1 hour ago, Damien said:

Any links to these couple of posts?

 

Seen the same poster mention it on a couple of other posts and also a couple of posters also claiming to hear something.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Griff said:

You'd expect existing contracts to be honoured.  But I've not seen the detail on how this cap is to be calculated.  I doubt if, for instance, there'll be a penalty for winning too many games, otherwise clubs will be given an incentive to deliberately lose.

Pretty sure there was always an estimate of the number of win bonus payments included in 'cap' planning calculations (and individual bonuses for such as number of appearances, tries scored etc, which I think was a fixed % of games for everyone) to avoid clubs going over the cap simply on the back of a really good season.

Posted
58 minutes ago, Blind side johnny said:

Don't worry - Newcastle will bail them out.

Huddersfield will merge with them

I'm having my fun and that's all that matters 

Posted
2 hours ago, phiggins said:

Only 2 of them are on reduced funding, but it’s a fair point. If either York or Toulouse have budgeted for income that hasn’t come as part of their application then they will struggle. It would also make a mockery of the decision to go to 14 as well.

York and Toulouse knew they would be on reduced funding when they applied for SL so that income it shouldn't have been in their budgets at all.

  • Like 1
Posted
58 minutes ago, M j M said:

York and Toulouse knew they would be on reduced funding when they applied for SL so that income it shouldn't have been in their budgets at all.

Did they definitely know before they applied? 

Posted
Just now, Archie Gordon said:

I believe they expected zero funding when they applied. 

Yeah, i think there was a quite from their owner saying they expected zero, so the half funding was a boost.

  • Like 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Archie Gordon said:

I believe they expected zero funding when they applied. 

That’s my memory of it

Build a man a fire, and he'll be warm for a day. Set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life. (Terry Pratchett)

Posted
1 hour ago, M j M said:

York and Toulouse knew they would be on reduced funding when they applied for SL so that income it shouldn't have been in their budgets at all.

I meant whether they’ve budgeted for higher attendances, or more revenue elsewhere

Posted
58 minutes ago, Dave T said:

Yeah, i think there was a quite from their owner saying they expected zero, so the half funding was a boost.

Indeed:

Goodchild said York won’t necessarily spend the full salary cap in 2026, but other recruits are being lined up and he insisted: “I’m thankful to be getting 50 per cent funding because we budgeted for zero. We have an additional £650,000 now.”

https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/rugby-league-news-york-knights-ready-for-super-league-as-funding-boost-explained-by-chair-109543/

 

  • Like 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.