Jump to content

JohnM

Non-Political
  • Posts

    26,261
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by JohnM

  1. 57 minutes ago, Worzel said:

    My eyes? The lines on the pitch?

    [no I’m not Keith Senior’s brother with a misunderstanding of the concept of momentum*]

    * niche forum reference 

    There have been many and long and deeply analytical discussions on here and in the ranks of academia about the difficulties of judging forward passes - trying to interpret how the 3d path of a moving ball maps onto the 2d space of a screen. It is those complexities that have resulted in n the VR not pronouncing on apparent forward passes.

  2. What effect  do people think the red card caused and will cause?

    1. Player and team punishment. The player is given  immediate punishment for bad technique and his team mates suffer, too, having to work even harder when it's not their doing. Plus "pour encourager les autres" on both sides?

    2. The coach(es) and players of all teams are reminded of the need to train in technique.

    At this stage of knowledge of the effects of contact with the head, I think that the high force/low force/mitigation/no mitigation is a reasonable attempt to quantify the seriousness of the offence.

     

  3. 20 hours ago, Dave T said:

    Whilst it is hard to argue with much of that, the NRL clearly has expertise, but it is tied up running the game in Oz. Those people in charge wouldn't be running the game over here. It would need it's own management team and that costs money. Which again comes back to investment.

    ...and talent, power, influence and more. If the management team were made up of exsisting RL and club administrators, I can only see disappointment. A track record in UK RL is the last thing I'd be looking for.

  4. 1 hour ago, RP London said:

    Is it being reported by gledhill?

    From Matt Shaw in a Leeds paper. "An early proposal Rugby League Live has learned of would have seen both the War of the Roses and the mid-season Test series take place, but it's thought that clubs aware of the plan were reluctant to add more games to the calendar or sacrifice a home game to make it happen."

    • Thanks 1
  5. 1 hour ago, fenster said:

    Outside of the Australasian expat community in Greater London I would be very surprised if they’ve even heard of the NRL.

    The big advantage the NFL has going for it is that it’s an American sport that comes with all the hype and showbiz attached to it.

    Certainly the Australasian expat communty in London has never shown any real and lasting interest in the Broncos in any numbers, even in the days of The Stoop and Branson - in  my experience. Nor have they shown much interest at RL as a whole, again, in any real numbers.

    The point I'm trying to make is, to steal and modify your words is "The big advantage the NRL would have going for it is that it’s an Australian sport that could come with all the hype and showbiz attached to it...if done similarly." To the younger Greater London potential market, SL presentation ( not the on-filrd action but the presentation, build up etc) must appear, if it appears at all, as staid, boring an unfashionalble. After all, it has been said that Australians are much like Americans but with an odd accent.

    And yes, Damien, London would have to play in a fitting stadium, hence combining the idea of a Vegas-style event and a big name stadium.

    All my flight of fantasy of course, but casting the ideas net wide. We could not afford for any NRL "takeover" to fail.

     

  6. In my view, if there was an NRL club in London, the general sporting public may not immediately associate it with SuperLeague as it would present a more dynamic, exotic almost, image similar to the way NFL do it at present. Sort of bringing the Vegas event to London.

    Yes there is general knowledge of Super League in the South and in my experience lots of southerners turn out for England internationals there. But an NFL- like presentation of a London NRL team could well excite and attract the younger demographic. 

    I have no evidence for any of this but faith is a wonderful thing as it needs no proof.

  7. 21 hours ago, The Blues Ox said:

    Yes it wouldn't be half assed but they would still have the problem of trying to promote a sport which is a long way from the countrys number one sport in a city that really does not seem to give a toss about RL. That is the stumbling block and history has nothing to suggest that any entity based in London could be a sustained success. Maybe it could happen but by the same account we might as well be saying the same about clubs like Swinton.

    In my view, if there was an NRL club in London, the general sporting public may not immediately associate it with SuperLeague as it would present a more dynamic, exotic almost, image similar to the way NFL do it at present. Sort of bringing the Vegas event to London.

    Yes there is general knowledge of Super League in the South and in my experience lots of southerners turn out for England internationals there.  But an NFL- like presentation of a London NRL team could well excite and attract the younger demographic. 

    I have no evidence for any of this but faith is a wonderful thing as it needs no evidence.

    By the way, Swinton has never been a hotbed of RL. As far back as I can remember ,(1959) the club has struggled financially, being on the edge of RLs traditional catchment. That includes the two consecutive seasons when they won the First Div comp.

     

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.