Jump to content

Exiled Wiganer

Coach
  • Posts

    10,072
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Posts posted by Exiled Wiganer

  1. 3 hours ago, Harry Stottle said:

    And if they are still in IMG's top 12?

    I would be fascinated to see the report provided to the clubs which formed the basis on which they decided to award Salford a licence this year. They were after all assessed by appropriately qualified (?) professionals chosen and paid to advise the clubs. Was there a material risks section, was anything highlighted to them? Most people who pay professionals to advise them receive some advice.

    Presumably there will be a report prepared when the professional assessment is prepared for SL in 26. And on the basis of that report and the associated scoring the clubs will make their decision.

    Some advisers would consider it part of their role to advise properly, especially in relation to a material risk. I have never come across one who would consider their job done while blithely watching their clients drive themselves off a cliff. 

  2. It is worth repeating: nothing has happened to SRD which was not entirely predictable last autumn. They had insufficient income to pay their debts from their ongoing business and no one in a position to pay them on their behalf. No sponsors have withdrawn, nobody has defaulted on their debts to SRD, no sugar daddy has walked away. In 2025, for the first time year we selected the line up of SL on the understanding that those 12 teams were the 12 best teams after an evaluation process.  Somebody prepared a report on SRD, including its financial position, and presented it to the clubs. In years gone by, we would be in “such is life” mode, but here we had the chance to do something about it. 

    We all deserve to see the report and recommendation that was presented to the clubs, because on the basis of the decision taken by the clubs after reviewing that report, the RFL and the game may shortly be faced with a choice between bankrupting itself having to bail Salford out, or breaching the Sky contract, which may lead to the same outcome. 

    • Like 6
  3. O’Neill has the chance to prove whether or not he is worth his place. My instinct is to go with more of a maverick/runner at 9, but from what I have seen O’Neill would not let us down.

    Nicholson showing the world his potential is really handy for us as he gives us much more than this version of Bateman.
     

    At prop potentially 3 of Wigan’s squad - Thompson, Harvard and Walters - could be good enough to do a job, giving us more strength in depth than we might have feared. That’s not to discount others, simply to say that to my mind they may cower the hurdle of being good enough. 

    So far so good as far as England players are looking this year. 

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Click said:

    He isn't exactly wrong.

    Wigan scored from each mistake Saints made in their own 20 - which there were plenty.

    If you are constantly pinned and under pressure, and behind on the scoreboard, errors happen. Especially in those conditions. They were induced by Wigan’s control and discipline. They flowed from Wigan’s excellent play. Once we had the ball we put on beautiful moves for 2 of the tries. Saints’ 2 tries also stemmed from Wigan mistakes, but again they were the result of Saints pressure and the first in particular was well executed. 

  5. 4 minutes ago, Bulls2487 said:

    Is it correct when it states that entering into administration would mean they would drop down a division next year under IMG’s gradings?  (I didn’t call them IMG’s gradings, they did, so those who characterise them as the clubs’ gradings can seek a retraction from the Sun). 

  6. 1 hour ago, Sports Prophet said:

    Income from broadcasting is not consistently the biggest percentage of revenue for sports clubs. In the NFL, NRL, AFL and Prem’ League, clubs predominantly earn less than 50% of their total revenue from broadcasting.

    For governing bodies, broadcasting revenue will be higher, but on this forum, there is too often a neglect for the importance of matchday revenue streams.

    Big crowds are vital for revenue and legitimising the public interest in any given sport to commercial partners.

    LOL - 3 sports and a pastime. 

    • Haha 1
  7. I am not sure this is an attendance thread point, but I was wondering whether the extent to which a ground looks fullish for TV is as (or more) important in TV revenue terms than the absolute figures. So, a full house of 8k at Trinity may be more important/valuable to us oddly than 10k at Huddersfield?

    While there are fewer than half the number of people at Leigh than at the Piedome, it looks and sounds terrific. And for the casual viewer there may be little difference in the impact it makes…

    • Like 1
  8. 9 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

    You're obsessed 😂😂😂

    Or perhaps you are. It isn’t me who ascribes any slither of good news regardless of context to the people who gave us the assessment system that lead to SL25 featuring an exciting new “Which Salford this week?” quiz game 😂😂😂 

  9. 1 hour ago, Tommygilf said:

    And people who know how to bring a positive vibe to a sport, in negotiation time with a major broadcaster...

    Remarkable what professionals can do isn't it.

    Maybe. Or, according to the article above, Vegas. Brought to us by the initiative of 2 world class clubs, one of whom is marketing the world record breaking Ashes series. Though I notice that the sun was shining when I was out earlier, and I don’t remember it doing so before IMG came along… 😇

    • Haha 1
  10. 44 minutes ago, The Hallucinating Goose said:

    Bloomin eck, Australians saying something positive about the international game?! What's going on?! I tell you, the buzz for the series is just extraordinary!!

    I think we have played a blinder. I have a v v slight annoyance that, if we had locked in the weekends and a rough plan (London weekend 1, north west weekend 2, Yorkshire weekend 3) even before finalising the details, that could have increased the prospects of getting more Aussies over. 

  11. 1 hour ago, The Hallucinating Goose said:

    There's been 4 games in this country since 1994 with higher attendances than will be at Everton.

    ----------

    90,000 - 2025 Ashes* 😉

    74,468 - 2013 World Cup final

    67,545 - 2013 World Cup semi-finals

    67,502 - 2021 World Cup final

    66,540 - 1995 World Cup final

    England only played in 3 of those. But we will be up to 4 soon enough. It does show how huge the Everton crowd is though. 

  12. I have decided not to delete my Everton Sold Out email. In April! Hats off to Moran and the team.
     

    Next step: do what they have done so far, and Wembley will be bigger than big. 
     

    I think we will beat the British record aggregate this time, with 70 something k on. With a fair wind the all time Ashes record could go. 
     

    I have a pet peev which is that we are constantly portrayed as a “small” sport, confined to the north - so much so that we even believe our own press. We watch the greatest game and our reach, and our audience is the equal and more of any sport after football, cricket and the fatties. If one byproduct of the imminent massive crowds is to make us all believe in ourselves more then we could be feeling the benefits for decades to come. 

    • Like 7
  13. On 28/10/2024 at 08:48, Damien said:

    As I said on the other thread Spurs, Elland Road and Bolton were meant to be the venues in 2020.

    If we swapped out Bolton for Evertons new stadium, which will be open then, or the Etihad and it would be perfect.

    Pretty close, Damien… 

    It’s fascinating to go back to the start of this thread. If you had told the posters then where we are today, they’d have been a pretty happy lot! 

    • Like 3
  14. 41 minutes ago, The Rocket said:

    Congratulations on the Test match ticket sales but I can assure you there`s not much moaning going on over here today, it appears that Good Friday`s Bulldogs/Souths match is set to break the all-time regular season crowd figure of 59 700 with estimates being made, given bays that are being released now at Accor, that suggest 70 000 is definitely doable. Earlier tonight some of the top bays have been thrown open with $10 seats in what some are seeing as the Dogs going for an 80 00 sell-out.

    Congratulations again and great news for League in both hemispheres.

     

    I was at that game 10 years ago. They should feel free to use that in their marketing. 

  15. On 09/04/2025 at 19:55, OMEGA said:

    That’s a rather obtuse and slanted way to view my post!

    of course it was about the optimism surrounding Wakefield Trinity which has seen the attendance sky rocket, surely a good thing rather than something to sneer at.

    As for reducing capacity to get sell out crowds, we’ve been steadily improving the stadium and increasing the capacity so I’m not sure where you’re getting that idea from. But hey ho, it’s a Rugby League forum it wouldn’t be a normal discussion if someone wasn’t pouring scorn on another club or looking for the negatives.

    Every silver lining has a cloud!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.