Jump to content

gingerjon

Coach
  • Posts

    43,955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    279

Posts posted by gingerjon

  1. 17 hours ago, Griff said:

    Again. it's not my reading of rule D1.60, which is that there is one appeal, either to the RFL or Sports Resolution.  At the discretion of the RFL.  This decision has had far reaching consequences and should not be dealt with internally.

    Having gone back to it last night, my reading follows yours. The appeal can go to the RFL or to Sports Resolutions. The process allows for either but not both.
    In both cases, the panel is independent and, in both cases, it is intended to review how the original decision was reached and the fairness of the sanction - it is not usually a fresh look at the evidence.

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 2
  2. 43 minutes ago, Tommygilf said:

    Correct, and it was clearly poor, just as Cas probably is for facilities. Hence this being their score breakdown for finances:

    Finance (max score 4.5): – 2.15

    Non-centralised turnover £: 1.50 / 2.25
    Non-centralised turnover %: 0.15 / 0.75
    Adjusted profit: 0.25 / 0.5
    Owner investment: 0.25 / 0.5
    Balance sheet strength: 0.00 / 0.5

    The clubs wanted a model that took a range of factors into consideration. They also wanted on field to be the highest scoring aspect of those factors. Finance, in all it's areas, therefore cannot be worth more than 5 points as that would put it on par with performance.

    Salford scored less than half the possible maximum for finances. Financially they clearly don't do very well. However, because they scored well in other areas, they still remain one of the top 12 clubs in the country overall. That may change. 

    If it was just on finances, Salford likely wouldn't be in the top 12. That's obvious. 

    But it isn't just about finances.

    That should end the debate on this specific bit really.

    • Like 4
  3. 1 hour ago, hawk-eye said:

    Victory: RFL backs down and agrees to independent review

     

    In a significant victory, the Rugby Football League (RFL) has relented and agreed to allow Mark Aston's case to be reviewed by Sport Resolutions, the UK's leading independent sports arbitration service used by virtually every other major sport, including football, rugby union and tennis.

    This breakthrough ensures that Mark's 18-month suspension will now receive proper independent scrutiny....

    They do know that Sports Resolutions is the RFL's named body for independent arbitration, don't they?

    • Like 1
  4. 12 hours ago, DEANO said:

    Who was the last team to be denied promotion in the football pyramid 

    You can have one from the other extreme as well. Despite finishing 7th, North Shields failed their grading (not completing required ground improvements) and were relegated into the league below.

     

  5. 5 hours ago, The Future is League said:

    I'm not saying it's a condition of being in Super League, but I think it's expected.

    I'm off the opinion that a condition of Super League is that you must run an academy, if you can't afford too, then you shouldn't be in Super League in my opinion.

    It doesn't have to be an academy but there have to be pathways for development in place - and they have to meet minimum standards. Chopping the academy but putting in place 'pathways' is what London did last year.

  6. 19 minutes ago, LeytherRob said:

    I'm sure I remember reading that part of the refusal was to appease the other Manchester adjacent clubs which if true is especially crazy considering how poorly run the majority of those clubs have been.

    The best thing that ever happened to Manchester Rangers' reputation for being saviours of the sport was not being let in. They've been the perfect club ever since.

    • Like 2
    • Haha 2
  7. 20 minutes ago, Chrispmartha said:

    Anyway I suppose it’s inevitable if they want to avoid games in at the same time.

    It's this. And avoiding games at the same time, as much as possible, has to be a priority in terms of rights selling and take up of things like SL+.

    • Like 4
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.