Jump to content

JonM

Coach
  • Posts

    10,691
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by JonM

  1. 6 minutes ago, The Phantom Horseman said:

    I've only been watching the Widnes Toulouse game for about the last half hour but it's been a shocker from what I've seen, absolutely riddled with basic errors from both sides. Both teams missing lots of regular starters though.

    Yes, I think only 5 of this Widnes team started against Toulouse at the start of the season, and no Ashall-Bott for Toulouse who was definitely their standout in that game.

    24-4 to Widnes. Probably a bit under 20 minutes to go, given the amount of stoppages for injuries.

  2. 10 minutes ago, sheddingswasus said:

    In the two matches Oldham have played there more than  a few late tackles. 

    51 minutes in the first half with the number of head injury assessments for Widnes players.  I think TO have been rather lucky not to be down to 12 on several occasions.

    If Toulouse were less intent on bullying the Widnes players and bit more focused on playing rugby league, they'd be miles ahead given the difference in size and speed, but it's 18-4 Widnes HT.  If they come out and play in the second half, they'll win - they're absolutely dominant in terms of territory.

  3. Seems strange to have announced a sell out at Lang Park and then a crowd which is 9k below nominal capacity.

    18 191 for St. George v Parra in Wollongong.

    17 055 for Manly v Wests at Brookvale yesterday and 17 527 for Newcastle.v Canberra.

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, Dave T said:

    I actually don't think we need to overthink what the actual name is, unless it is something like Blue Sox obviously.

    The important thing is that it is fully embraced. Even at Leigh where at the start it was clunky and less than professional, they fully bought into it and it wasn't just a new kit with a logo. 

    Whether you like it or not, The Hundred have gone in different direction to animal names, but again, they've gone bold and fully embraced it.

    London need to go big, or not bother. 

    A big problem, is it costs a lot and is a lot of effort. Something London haven't been great at.

    Exactly. I don't think London Spirit or Oval Originals were particularly great names. I don't think naming a team Saracens or Wasps or Arsenal or Spurs at whatever point in the past would've done anything all by itself either. It's not the actual name that matters, provided it's not too stupid. It's what you do with it. 

    • Like 1
  5. 4 hours ago, Deadcowboys1 said:

    Dear Lord, we are in a sorry state if schoolkids think hounds are more aggressive than Broncos. What do they teach them at school these days?

    I suspect most people in the UK would have no idea what a Bronco was and the most common answer would be a Ford Bronco SUV.

  6. 22 hours ago, wilsontown said:

    Yep, the units being replaced are the original ones. They're old.

    It's a good network but looking a bit tired and unloved the last time I used it. The station at Tynemouth is magnificent, though.

    I ran the length of Hadrian's Wall back in March, and to turn it into a proper coast to coast thing, continued on to Tynemouth, before getting the metro back. The priory, castle, beach, town centre etc. are beautiful. The station feels very grand relative to its current status, but seems to have had a fair bit spent on it recently. Judging by the adverts, they have regular book fairs and Farmer's markets inside the station, so it obviously gets a lot of use.

  7. 10 minutes ago, dkw said:

    What makes you assume that, because its a very bizzare assumption given the teams have spent the last 3 or 4 years complaining about a lack of competitive games, and the ridiculously inconsistent fixture list, leading to some clubs going weeks without a game, over a month without home games etc.

    It seems equally bizarre to assume that the L1 clubs would ask for more games and an official at the RFL would just say no.

    There's no obvious reason why the RFL would want to restrict the number of games played by L1 clubs - what would they gain by it? 

  8. My assumption is that L1 clubs didn't actually want more fixtures, because presumably if they did, they could simply have told the RFL that there needed to be loop fixtures and it could have been arranged well before the season started. I don't see any reason why the RFL would have said no, you need to play fewer games.

    Perhaps the risk of two away trips to Cornwall was too much for some clubs?

  9. Jacobsen Venture Group Limited was added as a supporting creditor to the court case yesterday. A supporting creditor is a party who joins the initial creditor in their attempt to have a company wound up. That seems pretty strange, as Sosaia Kailahi is Jacobsen Venture Group Limited's owner, and supposedly also the majority shareholder in Salford.

    I guess we'll see the court case outcome today and maybe things will become clearer.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.