Jump to content

M j M

Coach
  • Posts

    11,990
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    34

Posts posted by M j M

  1. 25 minutes ago, Celtic Roosters said:

     I just preferred RL when more clubs had a chance of winning things, it was a offence to pass the ball forward and results were decided by the players - not the match officials. 

    I've been moderately entertained by your recent posts, wondering where they would go next.

    But this one really did make me laugh, so congratulations. I too want to go back to those halcyon days when there was no need to complain about referees determining results due to their crazy decisions and forward passes being missed (/misunderstood by fans who don't understand the laws).

    More seriously, Rugby League is a sport that loves to change, its almost in its DNA. It was born out of a social and governance conflict and I guarantee there were some people in say 1910 pining for the old secure authority of the RFU, bemoaning these ridiculous new play the ball restarts and saying the game had never been the same since they outlawed tripping. 

    This level of ongoing change means it claws at our instincts for nostalgia even more than the average sport. Within that we all need to be careful to sort the wheat from the chaff, the normal and innocent evolution of a sport from the dangerously wrong-headed and fundamental changes that could undermine it forever.

    'Super Greed' may or may not fall into the latter category for fans of the game pre-1995. I know some who walked away from the sport then never to return. 

    But if you find yourself pining for the glory days of refereeing I'd suggest you have over indulged in the nostalgia bucket and probably need to go off for a few hours and watch some old games on Youtube to refresh your memory.

     

    • Like 3
  2. 1 minute ago, Pulga said:
    3 hours ago, M j M said:

    It won't have even crossed their radar.

    It certainly would have. 

    Club RL and Club RU in the UK are not really competing with each other. They are almost entirely geographically distinct and the addition of a London team isn't going to materially  change that. Restructuring of Super League isn't going to be the reason, or even part of the reason, for them to begin to take steps to address the continued failure of their league to be viable. The bankruptcy/teetering on the edge of multiple teams might finally be what has done it.

    • Like 2
  3. 25 minutes ago, graveyard johnny said:

    there is no loyalty in modern society - just looking after NO1- sad really

    I guess you'd agree the lack of loyalty the breakaway clubs showed the RFU in 1895 was very bad too.

    Players leave clubs and always have done. It's very sad that a future superstar like Gannon is leaving Leeds and Super League. But trying to shoehorn that into your usual Decline of Society stuff is boring.

    • Like 13
  4. 14 minutes ago, dkw said:

    I wonder if this is a fallout from the Salford shambles, RFL have maybe tightened up on the strictness of their rules.

    Wonder if it's more likely that the new owners are having second thoughts if Cas are going to be summarily kicked out of the league?

    • Like 3
  5. According to this -

    "more than 85,000 tickets already sold for the series" and confirming

    "fewer than 1,500 tickets remaining for the Second Test".

    https://www.rugby-league.com/article/63679/abk-beer-rugby-league-ashes-tickets-go-on-general-sale-tomorrow

    So my calculations:

    85,000 sold 

    less 19,800 (Headingley capacity) 

    less 52,900 (Everton capacity) 

    plus 1,500 (Everton unsold) 

    = about 14,000 sold for Wembley so far.

     

    • Like 3
  6. 17 minutes ago, EggFace said:

    2nd year had more games and only a small increase in crowd.....before we slut in up in sin city we need to look after our own backward in both North of England and NSW/Queensland and New Zealand.

    It's possible to do two things at once.

    And the crowd went from 32,000 to 45,000 YOY.

    • Like 1
  7. 6 minutes ago, JonM said:

    That's a recipe to lose a lot of money very quickly - and destroy the game in vital parts of the north of England in the process. It just reinforces how clueless Richardson is at times. Certainly it's not a league I would want my team to be a part of.

    • Like 4
  8. 18 minutes ago, hunsletgreenandgold said:

    Overall point still stands - having city status means very little. 

    That's definitely right. I think the main point is that even most of the big Rugby League clubs are in relatively small places. So if they were going for the Big Picture approach you'd start with the existing clubs in Leeds, Hull (perhaps merged) and London and then find five or seven in other genuinely big cities to add to it.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.