Jump to content

Charlie

Coach
  • Posts

    627
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Charlie

  1. Salford have averaged over 3k for the past few seasons. Although I agree that will drop in the champ and even less in league one. and they won’t get much income
  2. Based of a crown of 3k the council would make profit on food and drink alone. Although I have my doubt the loyal 3 k would turn up every game especially if there’s no buzz or hope
  3. Just throwing kids in isn’t the way
  4. Personally just don’t think Dodd has done anything to prove he’s NRL level. Not like he’s destroying cup hope he can improve
  5. I think they just meant signings to fill the squad out not top class players. First point of call is clear the debts after that that aim should be to invest in off field stuff to increase revenue and make sure we never end up in this spot again
  6. I live is Salford so I fully understand and agree but I can see the new owners wanting to replicate Wrexham
  7. They have just been bought out by a very wealthy American group although I’d agree with you
  8. The council won’t sell sale the stadium and it seems they still want to move. Wouldn’t be shocked to see Salford fc move in
  9. I’m just wondering who’s this loan against. It won’t be the club or king so has to be the new owners, but hard to see why they’d put 3m of debt to there name
  10. That’s what this bridge loan is about, to pay hmrc and others off just buying more time
  11. Biggest debts are to pay day loan company and that’s looking closer to 1 million
  12. “Earlier this week, The Sun reported that the club owed HMRC £500,000.” this was from serious about rl about a month ago sure you can find more if you want
  13. These are the figures that have been quoted by the press
  14. They owe hmrc around 750k and a loan company 900k 3m covers that
  15. That’s all that’s need to be paid immediately
  16. No it’s on his patroin new today
  17. The interesting part is how they have got it, it would be impossible to leverage a loan against the club so must be on the “owners”
  18. According to John Davidson Salford “owners “ have secured a bridge loan to pay off debt. How I have no clue but at least it give us breathing room
  19. By all reports stones fellow players felt the same. But it is what it is now rowley is entirely entitled to speak his mind like anyone else he’s in the same position at them
  20. Why does everyone think rowley runs the club he’s just the manager he has ever right to be upset with stone and stone has ever right to want out, not sure why this is a big deal
  21. I’ve argued with many other Salford fans when about players leaving as I can fully understand why. Personally think stones accommodation could of handle things better but it’s done now
  22. It’s not a simple as finding a player anywhere is it? And I don’t see why it matters 17 played and that’s all that can play personally I would have added a couple of reserves to pad the squad out. it’s easy to understand why rowley was disappointed and by all accounts the other player were with stone
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.