Honor James

Coach
  • Content Count

    782
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

184 Excellent

About Honor James

  • Birthday 10/03/1944

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Location
    LPL
  • Interests
    Rugby League - and a whole lot of other things like art, literature, painting, dancing, music, theatre, cooking, history etc. and so on.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Follow the link and read to the bottom ........ https://economist.com (plus a long link tail) And if you do, thanks for being interested. Go well, as they say in Zimbabwe (or hamba gachle, that is). 😊
  2. Honor James

    Zak Hardaker (Merged threads)

    Based solely on his past, onfield performance, that is probably a very reasonable thing for Wigan to want. As for the rest - my first husband struggled for years with the same problem. Fortunately for him, a great deal of professional help and support from friends and family led him finally to the right platform to overcome it and he has been dry for 45 years. It can be done. If Zak can run, week after week - as he does - again and again and again, at speed, straight into those massive Rugby League forwards you have to run into, if you want to play Rugby League, then for me (though I'm no expert), Zak has already got within him the strength of purpose, the self belief, the courage and the tenacity it will take. He may not know that but he uses all those things to play Rugby League. They all do. I wish him the very best of good help, good healing and good health.
  3. Honor James

    Neutral Referees for Internationals

    Penalty counts have got nothing to do with it. If you've got to the stage where you suspect referees of fiddling the penalty count then you need help. The fact is that having an Australian referee whenever Australia is playing, simply makes the sport look ridiculous. For goodness sake! In sport, in general, if local amateur team Fredfish is playing a league game against local amateur team Joesoap (omit friendlies from this), then the referee will not normally, even at amateur level, be a member of either the Fredfish or the Joesoap club. Amateur tennis championships in a small place like Zimbabwe can manage this, why not professional Rugby League? If Zimbabwe is playing Zambia at football they bring a referee in from neighbouring Botswana or Mocambique. It makes no sense at all, that after all these years, Rugby League remains incapable of engaging a neutral referee for every one, of very few, international games. Nobody here, I'm sure, is in any way casting aspersions on the referees themselves. They are merely appointed to officiate at matches. It is whoever (or whichever committee) is in charge of selecting and appointing referees, whose metaphorical socks need a good pulling up. If Rugby League is incapable of bringing itself into line with the rest of the sporting world, for the credibiity of the game, then let it be brought into line for the sake of the thousands of outstanding Rugby League players who have, for many long years, deserved far better management from 'above'.
  4. Honor James

    Man of Steel 2018

    Interesting question. I don't know who does the final picking, does anybody?
  5. Honor James

    Man of Steel 2018

    Ooops, sorry. I clicked on the wrong quote so I have asked my question again ..... below.
  6. Honor James

    Man of Steel 2018

    Barba? Very disappointed. Fun to watch when `on the lucky run' but all flash and dash - no staying power worth mentioning at all. An entertainer. A good one. But for me it's John Bateman this year ........... Bateman has given us everything that any elected Rugby League Man of Steel must have given. No flash and dash at all, but tough, relentless committment, skill and courage in spades.
  7. Honor James

    Our new position in the EU

    Me bang on about name calling and someone called `Jihad Jaqui'? No offence, but you must be confusing me with someone else; I have never written anything about her (him or it) whoever she (he or it) may be (real or fictional). And whichever - she (he or it) seems a bit beyond my limited sphere of interest, politically speaking. Which, you may have noticed, tends mostly to the parochial and leans heavily on the past. πŸ™‚
  8. Honor James

    Our new position in the EU

    I couldn't agree more. And it's a pity now, isn't it, that Tusk and quite a few other Bureaurocratic Admin Dumbo, so-called leaders, started out determined to stamp the UK back under the bureaurocratic boot. A little less rudeness, a few less heel-clicking-flashback moments in the lead-up to referendum day, and there are many people like me, I supect, undecided up to the moment of putting a cross in one box or the other, who might have chosen to "err on the side of caution rather than courage". But there it was, large as life on TV ( I have mentioned it before); Tusk saying to group of young Belgian students in a Brussels square, just prior to voting day, "The British people will do as they are told." Few words - big effect. Big, bad effect, if you still believe the UK should have voted to stay under the (velvet covered) jackboot. Which last, I think, well-enough defines my current position on all of this. It is still, as it was the day I voted: "Oh yeah? Heard that before, as a small baby under a stone-topped kitchen table in 1944."
  9. Honor James

    Our new position in the EU

    Today, this whole business sounds like nothing so much as a continuation of an entire, two, wasted years of prevaricating, smoke and mirror, daisy-picking-nonsensensical: "We're leaving, we're leaving not, we're leaving, we're leaving no ... ot?.... er? um/er? can anybody think of anything else to say to delay making a decision on this - or on anything to do with it? er?" How stupid a breed of politicians/voters actually believes at all in it? In: "Let us/let them prevaricate long enough and you/they can get away with anything/everything," way of tackling difficult issues? It's enough to make the composite kings Arthur turn over in their graves.
  10. A bit like the Rugby Union setup: England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales play test matches The British Lions go On Tour. And it seems to me, though I don't know enough about it really, that they tour in a special capacity. Not officially defined as ambassadorial, but effectively that is what their role seems to be .............. As well, of course, as playing rugby matches with no other intention but to beat their opponents every time ............ Which may seem a little ambassadorially strange if you think about it, but it seems to work. Maybe somebody else here knows the proper, official facts.
  11. I don't remember hearing either you or Danny Lockwood getting more than a fleeting chance to get two-words in edgeways, Richard. To me it came across almost exclusively Damian Irvine. The `star guest!' (rather like Ben Barba at Saints this year), but this one giving us the benefit of his wisdom rather than skill, at length, on almost everything that came up. With Rod Studd excitedly adding a twopence-ha'penny from time to time of course, before handing the floor back to the ready-to-oblige magus from Australia. Merlin the magician throwing fireballs to the audience could scarcely have made a better job of up-staging the whole bang-shoot. But that's just me. I believe most people who said anything, didn't mind (nay, reported having enjoyed) his monologe-with-breathing-space-interpolations-by-Rod way of taking part in a discussion. And perhaps I only noticed it because I have a tendency to hold-the-floor myself (albeit only in private), so I may be rather more attuned to the failing in others.
  12. I would like to point out - for the benefit of those who did not watch that episode - that the person doing an inordinate amount of interrupting during that episode was not you Richard. It was Rod Studd, always ebullient but on that occasion coming across as just plain rude. To be fair, perhaps prompted by an anxious producer prodded `from above' to "make it hard-hitting" - although I cannot know that. But whatever, although I may be a bit old-fashioned about `turn and turn about', I found Rod's apparent determination (in that episode) to be the `only other pebble on the beach' (by virtually ignoring two of his three invited guests), so uncomfortable to watch I switched the television off. Didn't even go back to see if parts 2 and 3 improved. A first time ever switch-off for me - for Rugby League Backchat.
  13. Brilliant! If ever a concrete example proved that badgering-on and on, ad nauseum, when the person you are interviewing is clearly determined to side-step the question no matter how many times you badger and re-badger, this is it. Lesson for interviewers: never let the extent of your badgering make a fool of you. If your interviewee side-steps any question more than twice (three times?) it is just as clear to your audience as it is to you, that although he is side-stepping you are making a fool of yourself. Fortunately, the young(er) Mr Paxman was intelligent enough to learn from his mistakes, and in later years deployed his rapier wit in more productive ways.
  14. Perhaps you may not have thought this through quite fully. Perhaps, if you want to get people like Ralph Rimmer to occasionally take part in a discussion programme on television; to offer their opinions, version of events, thoughts for the future and so on; perhaps it may be advisable not to make them feel they are only there to be pumped to death, criticised, laughed into touch and/or just plain disbelieved. Like all of us, Ralph Rimmer has a job to do; a job that requires him to maintain a dignified and prudent image for the sake of the game he represents. Why assume that with him, only a third-degree interrogation style session could be of interest and useful? It is useful, I believe, to have people like Ralph take part. People in high-office (at whatever level), officials like Ralph who, while operative and controlling to a certain extent, are also representative and therefore requisitely discrete. What gain then, if the first time someone like Ralph agrees to join your discussion panel, you succeed only in convincing him that, having offered himself up for one battering he will not make the same mistake again? Surely it is better to enjoy the occasional benefit of having some currently pertinent questions, some concerns or policies explained - in a relaxed and informal way - from the official point of view. I would like to see Backchat able to invite RFL officials, in various capacities, onto the show from time to time, without coming slap-bang up against a ban on any such participation, imposed `from above'. We could surely benefit from the potentially enlightening (if moderately cautious), freely offered knowledge and opinions of many such people. That will never be possible, however, until current television audiences throw off this `TV channel war' nurtured obsession with `ooh, aaah drama!'; the idea that only conflict can possibly be interesting; the belief that any interviewee not grilled `noughties-Paxman’ style will, by-definition, be getting away with lying. Surely the man being grilled is the man more likely to resort to lies. ? πŸ˜€
  15. ........... or their ability to create regular, positive-image promoting publicty for their club and for the game as a whole. It must have happened, of course, but it would be interesting to know when last any UK based club was officially recognised and applauded by its own town council, or city hall. http://www.totalrl.com/wolfpack-feted-at-toronto-city-hall/