Jump to content

phildog

Moderators
  • Posts

    4,513
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by phildog

  1. If he's not upto the pace a)that's Leeds' fault for not using him more, just what is he training full-time with them for and b) that's the reason they've been letting him play for us to get game practice. Also, if they STILL don't think he's good enough, why did they chase him and why have they picked him on a corresponding match when he could still have been playing for us?
  2. You're a bit behind the times on here!! So, Last has gone, how does that affect Craig Lingard, does anyone know if his entire team will go? Obviously prime candidates will be Powell, who drags Sheridan around everywhere or Radford.
  3. You're a bit behind the times on here!! So, Last has gone, how does that affect Craig Lingard, does anyone know if his entire team will go? Obviously prime candidates will be Powell, who drags Sheridan around everywhere or Radford.
  4. Either Radford or Powell will come back to Cas. Powell goes nowhere without Ryan Sheridan. Radford also could have an entourage. Either appointnent would I think put Linners in jeopardy which then begs a question, could he remain at Batley now we've officially appointed Mokko as his successor? This is a whole can of worms, opened by Austin leaving Leeds and the knock-on effect is large for Cas, Leeds and Batley. Leeds are having to replace Austin at 6, Myler would step up normally but he's injured, they've taken Hooley back at an important time as we need to beat Bradford and then into the final, where everybody says 'no problem, Leeds aren't playing, they'll let him play' but it doesn't necessarily follow as if he is then earmarked for full back they won't want to risk him getting injured playing for somebody else. I think that Linners is a man who CAN separate one thing from another especially when the Cas situation isn't anything that he can control so for us at least for 2 weeks it'll be business as usual.
  5. Don't know what the weather's like down Batley but been constant rain up here. Concerned at the several other games proposed on the pitch over the weekend.
  6. Doro in and out, left Halifax gone to Bulls so we'll face him a week early! Foster left Bulls as well.
  7. All very well if as I say Leeds prohibit it.
  8. Deserves a chance at Leeds. Also deserves the chance of running out at Wembley. If he returns to Leeds and is earmarked as regular fb will they let him play for us with the chance of injury? Just thinking broadly.
  9. Still got a snarl when the occasion arises Linners!
  10. Have seen more than 1 comment that Blake Austin has moved to Castleford from Leeds. That could be bad for us; Myler would probably move up to 6 leaving Leeds short of a full-back. If the rumour is true that sounds bad for this weekend and possibly Wembley for Luke.
  11. Reffed us v York and a few others, hasn't upset me. His mate Smaille is quite good as well.
  12. Get your point Bullmania but alternatively losing one puts pressure on us further down the line ie v Eagles, that's the one we could do to be in the position of it not mattering. Wembley or not have you ever known a Dogs team take anything easy and not put everything on the line?
  13. Did you have to pay Fev TV to see highlights. We haven't had any from Toulouse now none from Fev....
  14. So we sponsor the guy for Wembley at £250 yet 'have the opportunity' to then pay again to get the shirt and no further cost mentioned? Is that about right?
  15. Not heard anything about this from the club re my player...by 'purchase their shirt' do you mean that by sponsoring the player that counts as 'purchasing' or an expectation of paying on top to get the shirt/polo?
  16. We've just been handed a great fillip; if Bulls had won there would have been a point between us for Sunday, so they can't catch us anyway. If we win we put 5 points between. Halifax could then only go equal with Bulls should we win.
  17. Me!! Rumours Batley Bob? I thought it was an intriguing question!!
  18. Ah!' Were they the Viaplay game m? So I was mistaken.
  19. Now then, now then guys n gals, ...imagine this; Powell leaves Warrington, Castleford sack Last and appoint Powell. Where would that leave Linners? Powell drags Sheridan around with him, we've already appointed Mokko.... repkace Grix at Halifax?
  20. Am I misinformed? I thought their game had been moved to Saturday?
  21. Matter of interest; how come Halifax got a change of date next weekend to allow them extra rest/prep time? Seems like we're not just playing Halifax eh?
  22. No, as usual it's me who sticks gmhis head above the parapet and asks awkward questions and thanks nineoil for asking the same question (btw you beat me by 2 years); why should teams reaching finals, Wembley or Grand NOT see financial gain? That surely is the point in doing well enough to get to these finals? Now let's move on to attracting players...how many times might we have lost a player due to constraints? They certainly don't APPEAR to come knocking on our door out of respect for our achievements do they? So, what DOES it come down to? Yes, we might attract that type of Batley player but then keep asking them to work twice as hard under injury stress because there aren't enough.
  23. So basically there's sod all in it, paying for the prestige. Just so we know, we'll still not be able to attract players next season cos we'll still be poor. I guess that was at the heart of your question Rog!!
  24. Bromley, Cropper not had mention for weeks after he was picked as a starting prop for about 3 weeks and wasn't at York supporting. I reckon Walshaw will be in the Wembley side, was training pre York and probably due a match test v Bulls.
  25. POR & Normy;Still a better than average squad there!!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.