Rugbyleaguesupporter

Might get 8k from Wigan on top of existing sales behind posts. East stand now looks quite full. Middle section gone from 90pc free to about 15pc free- so I reckon lots of rows not on sale sadly

£100k a game from Sky per home game. That's 4k paying punters And PPV income if leigh sold would be sub £10k average

Just looked on website for Samoa match at Wigan. I don't see how we get to 10k attendance based on current sales

If the average is a programme average (rather than match average)- we basically have 450k people who watched the entire match. Good news is that we have a solid Base of people who like RL and buy subscriptions for it. Less good is struggle to attract floating viewer. Doesn't appear that many people dipped in which would generate a bigger difference between peak and average

To be pedantic, I think we went early one year (?) I want to say 2013. Anyway year after next, the football calendar is changing. The Sep and Oct breaks are merging (late sep/ early oct) so there will be 2 free weekends- ideal for our semis and final

Hopefully Wigan not including 4k away tickets as sold! If any sense- give Leigh a block in East Stand- they can sell 6k So if its on 16k then let's hope for 20k

£32 to sit behind posts at Hull fc v salford on Saturday And I sound like a broken record but 10 mins of match was wasted by looking at a video screen.

I switched over, still no decision, switched off. Process is dire- it's making me irritable watching a match so its gone off

Yes- so SL could get Sky to produce all games and SL plus only show them- but then Sky rights fee reduces by £4.5m SL are not easily recouping that £4.5m from subscriptions to SL plus. The hope is that 10k or so are like you @Dave Tand that generates £1m of income

EFL clubs have rights to full matches on demand. Sky have rights to show 10-15 minute highlights Clubs can use these rights to make more money- like super league plus- by people buying additional subscriptions

@tiffersone less subscriber now, but what's your evidence for Sky having fewer subscribers? The whole point of super league plus was to make money from people who want to have all Super League matches on demand. The uncomfortable truth is that it will be a pittance. Very roughly, Sky will pay the following: £17m for best 2 SL games a week (exclusive) £21.5m for best 2 SL games a week (exclusive) and 4 others live on streaming £21.5m for best 2 SL games a week (exclusive) and 4 others live and on demand So SL went for option 2 and hope to get £100k from Super league plus

I can't see any of this weeks SL highlights or match replays on Now tv phone app- will check tv app later

Everything is live on Now. Two of the matches per round will nowbe avaliable on demand (all from Magic weekend) So same as last year- but bonus that there are 4 extra matches live

No- they were quite clear decisions. The ref should have given the sanction after blowing for penalty. The unofficial protocol appears to be blow for penalty and then let Video Ref reccomend sanction. Even with this so, the video ref should have said yellow card after 1 to 2 replays Then the referee can just show the yellow card instead of then talking through the framework. This drawn out affair, with dread of video ref is very unappealing

I have no objection on the whole to yellow cards for high tackles. I object to what seems an obligatory 90 second pause to produce the card and the fact that video ref is directing the card.