Why Featherstone Rovers forward faces minimum six-match ban if found guilty of Grade F charge

[Grimmy]

23 minutes ago, Marauder said:

Talking to the number 22s dad and asked how he had got on, he said that the audio of his lad talking wasn't clear but never sounded anything  like "Spastic" but the panel said "It sounds like" not "You said spastic" so he was advised to take the minimum penalty, 6 games and £500. I suppose this is another reason why a union is required, to fight such findings, legally the cost is far to much individually for a player to fight a case, having a union rep there could see him/her/none binary make a decision to fight a case.

 

 

There was no audio. The camera was on the opposite side of the pitch and the officials weren't mic'd up in that game. Any more made up reasons he's not guilty (despite him pleading guilty)? 

Edited February 22 by Grimmy