Jump to content


League Express

Podcast

Photo
- - - - -

Ben Cockayne's two match ban...


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 12,768 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 04:51 PM

According to the paper, Hull KR fans have accused the RFL disciplinary panel of inconsistency, after Cockayne received the severest punishment. So the paper contacted the RFL to ask them to justify it...



http://www.thisishul...il/article.html

"His poor disciplinary record in Super League-which had seen him referred to the disciplinary panel six times in four years-and his entering of a "not guilty" plea to the charge of fighting, were also taken into consideration"

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

          NO BUTS IT'S GOT TO BE BUTTER......                                 Z1N2MybzplQR6XBrwB9egniMH8xqYQ5s.jpg                                                                                                                     


#2 deluded pom?

deluded pom?
  • Coach
  • 8,549 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 04:58 PM

QUOTE (Old Frightful @ Jul 22 2010, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
"His poor disciplinary record in Super League-which had seen him referred to the disciplinary panel six times in four years-and his entering of a "not guilty" plea to the charge of fighting, were also taken into consideration"

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif



He must be even dumber than I thought he was.

rldfsignature.jpg


#3 Tommy The C5t

Tommy The C5t
  • Coach
  • 13,479 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 05:20 PM

QUOTE (Old Frightful @ Jul 22 2010, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
According to the paper, Hull KR fans have accused the RFL disciplinary panel of inconsistency, after Cockayne received the severest punishment. So the paper contacted the RFL to ask them to justify it...



http://www.thisishul...il/article.html

"His poor disciplinary record in Super League-which had seen him referred to the disciplinary panel six times in four years-and his entering of a "not guilty" plea to the charge of fighting, were also taken into consideration"

laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif


laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif biggrin.gif



#4 deluded pom?

deluded pom?
  • Coach
  • 8,549 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 05:25 PM

Did Hudgell advise him by any chance?

rldfsignature.jpg


#5 Tommy The C5t

Tommy The C5t
  • Coach
  • 13,479 posts

Posted 22 July 2010 - 06:11 PM

QUOTE (deluded pom? @ Jul 22 2010, 06:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Did Hudgell advise him by any chance?


I saw his tv advert earlier today with the bloke doing 60mph on the city ring road with mobile phone in hand laugh.gif wink.gif

#6 Old Frightful

Old Frightful
  • Coach
  • 12,768 posts

Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:19 AM

QUOTE (deluded pom? @ Jul 22 2010, 06:25 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Did Hudgell advise him by any chance?

That's a very good point. Surely it's in the interest of all clubs to present the best case for any of their players up before the beak. And as I imagine the RFL disciplinary panel will have watched the game and will have all the video evidence they need, clearly a "not guilty" verdict on the charge of fighting was lunacy.

          NO BUTS IT'S GOT TO BE BUTTER......                                 Z1N2MybzplQR6XBrwB9egniMH8xqYQ5s.jpg                                                                                                                     


#7 maroonandgold

maroonandgold
  • Players
  • 59 posts

Posted 23 July 2010 - 03:02 PM

I suppose it just confirms what many suspected.....he's no idea what he's doing.

There's 10 types of people in the world...those who understand binary and those that don't





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users