Jump to content





johnh1

Member Since 10 Feb 2014
Offline Last Active Today, 06:37 PM
-----

#3059831 Visit England Ad

Posted by johnh1 on 23 January 2015 - 08:37 PM

Record crowd...honestly your only fooling yourself.
With all due respect, I'm Irish, I live in Ireland, I was here when the RLWC was taking place, and you would have had no idea it was happening. An equally low profile sport, the cricket world cup, did manage to get some publicity (granted not much), because we had IRISH players playing and their performance was followed. A team of foreigners got precisely zero coverage.
I should add, I enjoyed watching Australia, England and NZ....Thurston, Burgess and Johnson were new names to me and they excited me to no end. The blokes that wore green I couldn't have cared less about.


So we should just give up on international Rugby League? Is that what you are saying? Or should we build on a fantastic World Cup followed by a wonderful 4 Nations? Just because you couldn't care less about your own nations national team is not a reason to give up in my book.


#3057991 Visit England Ad

Posted by johnh1 on 20 January 2015 - 04:28 PM

Perhaps more companies would be willing to associate with our world cup it it weren't such a farcical competition.


You talk about 'our' World Cup. I've never associated you with being a League fan. It was a wonderful competition by the way. Much better than the kickathon and scrumathon that is to follow shortly.


#3057856 Newcastle Thunder

Posted by johnh1 on 20 January 2015 - 12:03 PM

Great news. No disrespect to Gateshead, but the name Newcastle just has something about it. Wouldn't it be great if, one day, Newcastle played Newcastle for the World Club challenge?


#3056975 WCC - sell outs?

Posted by johnh1 on 18 January 2015 - 12:38 PM

Well, as a Salford fan, but living in sunny Gran Canaria, I know that if I was still living in the Manchester area, I would be attending all three games and supporting the British teams. Beating the Aussies. There is nothing better than that feeling.


#3055661 Leigh Fans Welcome FuiFui

Posted by johnh1 on 14 January 2015 - 05:21 PM

It is very unlikely that Leigh or anyone else will be promoted under this system. Don't get your hopes up too much.


Well Leigh have got more chance of promotion than they had previously. I'm not a Leigh fan, I'm a Salford and RL fan, and would love to see them up there again.


#3044572 glasgow v toulouse

Posted by johnh1 on 13 December 2014 - 03:27 PM

Well I managed the first 7 minutes. There were 4 line outs, each taking over 30 seconds. Let's call that 2 minutes. There was one scrum. That took 3 minutes and 10 seconds. Yes, I timed them out of curiosity. So 5 out of the first 7 minutes was taken up by line outs and scrums. That doesn't include rucks and mauls, and thankfully, there were no attempts at kicking goals. After the scrum was won, the scrum half kicked it straight back in to touch. And this is supposed to be a game that Sam Burgess is struggling to cope with. Give me strength.


#3043520 Hooker, a misomer?

Posted by johnh1 on 10 December 2014 - 09:08 PM

The rah rah game being a six nations game played at Twickenham in front of 80,000 fans the league game the 4 nations final played in front of 25,000 people (in a stadium that will hold 36,000).
 
I guess people prefer to watch proper scrums with pushing despite the hyperbole around league being more spectator friendly  :tongue:


So, Tiny Tim's response in all of this is to say that more people watched a Union game than a League game. No attempt to justify the three collapsed scrums then a penalty, against the running rugby that we see in our game. If more people prefer watching collapsed scrum, followed by collapsed scrum, followed by collapsed scrum, then penalty, then good luck to them. Certainly not something that I can watch for any length of time.


#3043309 Huddersfield Great, Challenge Cup Winner, Wanganui Man, All Black, Athlete, R...

Posted by johnh1 on 10 December 2014 - 11:13 AM

Explain why there was a ban on players professionalising themselves  then? What was the reason for it? Please note that it included making money from the game via sources such as books and/or other media and not just being involved with Rugby League. They must have had some rationalisation for the ban. What was it?


I don't recall any players being banned for appearing on A Question Of Sport. Please don't try and tell us that they did for free and paid their own train fares and hotel rooms. And are you trying to say that Union players and officials never wrote autobiographies? Do you want a list? So who did get banned for things such as this? Come on, Gosman. Back up your outrageous claims with some facts for once.


#3035626 Why Rugby Union over Rugby

Posted by johnh1 on 20 November 2014 - 09:43 PM

The RWC is a bit of a bigger deal than the 4N :P
 
 
 
 
However, I agree with you, the BBC really didn't trail the 4N very well at all. I was fortunate that I saw the highlights of the 4N final as I was waiting for the RU internationals. Glad I did, cracking final.


Bigger than a new fangled, hybrid game of netball that is being tried out in schools? That got a full 5 minutes of coverage, yet the 4 nations final, about to be kicking off and covered live on another channel of the BBC got zilch. Absolutely nothing. If you think that that is ok, then fine. I don't.


#3035226 Another idea taken from Rugby League

Posted by johnh1 on 19 November 2014 - 10:33 PM

Bless, you are new on here so will have missed a lot of the more outrageous stories. There's been some cracking claims over the years.


Bless you too. I've been on here for quite a while actually. Certainly long enough to know that you are a troll and talk absolute nonsense.


#3034393 Why Rugby Union over Rugby

Posted by johnh1 on 17 November 2014 - 07:38 PM

In an attempt to answer your point on the ball in play time, TBH this isn't something that bothers me that much. I do get annoyed when there are a constant stream of reset scrums as the front rows puff their chests out and point out their oppositions transgressions to the officials but I can't say I clock watch all that much. Saying that I am in favour of stopping the clock at scrum time and restarting it at the put in.


The game would take all day if you did that!


#3034012 5 Drives and a kick

Posted by johnh1 on 16 November 2014 - 10:27 PM

And no reply from the likes of Tiny Tim and his ilk. Are these people embarrassed about how superior our game is to theirs?


#3033242 Why Rugby Union over Rugby

Posted by johnh1 on 15 November 2014 - 04:20 PM

If anyone has watched the New Zealand v Australia Four Nations final, and then watched the Wales v Fiji union borefest, and can seriously say that they prefer Union over Rugby, I'd love them to explain why.


#3031458 Letting the side down

Posted by johnh1 on 11 November 2014 - 07:53 PM

He's trolling. Best to ignore that kind of nonsense.


You would know all about trolling wouldn't you, Tiny Tim?


#3026773 09/11/14 - Australia v Samoa KO 5am GMT (Wollongong)

Posted by johnh1 on 03 November 2014 - 10:45 PM

There is no more chance of Australia failing to get the required victory margin, than there is of Boxhead admitting he is wrong about that no try. An Aussie ref will make sure the victory margin is sufficient.