Padge

Right decision. If he had hit the head first would have deserved ared.

Wigan seem to want to defend, making it easy for Saints.

If this a reference to anything I posted I genuinely do not have a clue what it is about,

Cas have fallen foul of failing to fulfil past promises that they used to stay in SL. If they chose to lose by having a ###### squad so they have money to spend on a stadium now is irrelevant, they didn't do as they promised and they are now have to pay the price. Having a ###### side this year will not build a stadium next year, will IMG fall for the bu!!$h!t like the RFL did, I think possibly not.

I did, you wouldn't be in the situation if you had followed up on promises. Therefore you should accept your fate and not whinge about IMG.

We paid aprox. £7m, to the costs of the stadium.

They should have built the new stadium years ago when they promised to do so they could stay in SL.

Explain why the way decisions were made changed then. Chapter and verse, why?

Whitest? Are you implying something about his political views?

TFFT

Conditions are same for both sides, including half-backs.

Its amazing how the early clamp down on high shots reduced high shots, so much so that they could reduce the punishment. A short sharp shock can have quick results.

The way the decision is made was changed because fans complained. It used to be ref didn't know give it video ref. Complaints when ref had a good view. If unsure ref passed back to on-field ref, people complained, benefit of doubt. So we now have ref gives his opinion which can only be overturned by obvious, repeat OBVIOUS, reason. Whinge all you want you have two options over who gets the say, but you can't have both without ref and VR standing over a screen for 10 minutes to work it out.

He has to have evidence it isn't a try, obvious evidence. Blurred slow mo doesn't give that, you need high speed cameras that show clear frame by frame. When refs didn't give an opinion people complained, when refs give an opinion people complain. You can't have both, and one or the other is going to anger people.

Why?

Its about the contest not the score.

Cas should go for it from half-way? Leeds defence?

Full moon tonight from the back garden.

Well that just about backs up my point.

No, but will it be all that much compared to a split of a much bigger attendance at the home of the SL team. Not everyone who attends from an SL club will spend money in the ground.

Gate money for cup games is split 1/3 Home Team, 1/3 Away Team, 1/3 RFL, the better pay day may be the SL club at home for lower teams.

But that is not how they read, they put obligations on everyone who signs up. That includes the originators. You should find another sport to hate. The RFL has been recognised as a leader in sports governance, it may get up your craw but it is a rare thing RL is respected for. Perpetual whingers like yourself, who whinge with no reason, or evidence, do more damage to the game that the RFL has ever done.

The operational rules are what everyone signs up to and people would be up in arms if the RFL didn't follow the operational rules. If the operational rules are not followed and something ends up in court the fact the rules were ignored could be used against one side or the other.

We have a pair of pigeons nesting in a tree at the front, they have done so for about the last four years. This time of year they start fixing up the nest for spring, as they are building it the magpies come along and nick bits of it.

Yep, Smith obstructed.