north yorks trinity
Coach-
Posts
554 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
north yorks trinity last won the day on August 19 2023
north yorks trinity had the most liked content!
Member Profile
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Harrogate
Recent Profile Visitors
2,220 profile views
north yorks trinity's Achievements
567
Reputation
-
There's nothing new here and nothing re emerging. The rule is (and always was) that the ball needs to be passed in a backward direction relative to the passer (i.e. not relative to the ground). The so called "momentum rule" was simply Stevo explaining this concept. FWIW I thought at first viewing that Wigan's second try had more than one forward pass but IMO the replays clearly show the hand movements of the players making the passes and all were good.
-
Funny the tricks memory plays. I remember being thrilled watching the match on Sportsnight without knowing the score and being absolutely buzzing after. I guess we were so starved of good coverage that any crumbs were gratefully devoured. Plus beating the Aussies at RL would even be exciting on teletext for me!!
-
1895 Cup Connotations for Quarter Finals
north yorks trinity replied to Mumby Magic's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
Probably not that difficult for them. They'd need to win by 178 to top the group but would most likely go through as best 2nd placed side with a win of around 150. -
Great result for Batley. Also for Wakefield as it probably puts one of our main rivals for the cup out of the picture. Just need to be careful that Wakefield don't put too many points on York these last 20 mins to ensure York rather than Fev get best 2nd placed team. (Bit tongue in cheek as I'm sure that's not on their mind and also York sound to be battling hard and have the wind behind them 2nd half)
-
Have we got a RL Joey Barton ?
north yorks trinity replied to Chrispmartha's topic in The General Rugby League Forum
There's nothing wrong with box ticking, as long as the boxes are well considered such as, for example, ensuring that some demographics aren't overlooked just because is was the custom to overlook them in the past. I believe you made a similar point much earlier in the thread. I'm happy for people to criticise the inclusion of certain boxes to be ticked but let's not let that become a criticism of the whole genre of box ticking. -
Could they have used anonymised data? Maybe not as it may be too reliant on honesty, which is never a good thing! Or they could have looked at engagement with schools and clubs no matter how geographically distant, an example being Wakefield's involvement with a club in Immingham. That said, my own opinion (and that's all it is based on no more than gut feel and possibly flawed intuition) is that the clunky measure arose from a combination of laziness and incompetence.