hullste

Penalty after penalty in the last 20 to Catalans is what determined the outcome of the game. I'm done with RL it's worse than the Liverpool debacle in the premier League last weekend

He should be penalised for milking or are we wanting to go the football way.

I think in the past he has and has been totally honest in his summing up unlike most coaches. First time tonight I thought he has been more like most other coaches with the blinkers on

I like Matty Peer always speaks well but to call both disallowed tries the same is absolutely wrong, one is on the outside shoulder and stops the player moving accroas and one is on the inside shoulder and has no impact whatsoever. First time I've been disappointed with his comments, hope he's not on the slippery slope

That is not obstruction, video ref can clearly see yet won't overrule, scandalous decision

Think Wellens has stated in the past that any side would concede a 6 again and back their defence instead of conceding a try. It is the rule that is the issue but all sides have manipulated it however Clarke only called out Saints yet Wigan have employed the same tactic on at least 3 occasions this afternoon. Clarke is commentating but totally ignored it for his beloved cherry and whites

Funny how Phil Clarke called Saints cheats for deliberately conceding 6 again when defensive line is stretched but has totally ignored the same tactic from Wigan several times this afternoon

He's serving the second game of his ban. You need to let the injury to wright go it's not as of you've not mentioned it 500 times already

I'm a Saints fan and also would like those mentioned to stop committing silly fouls which ultimately lead to repeated suspensions (lost count how many games between them they have missed this season). I also have no issue withe bans received. My only issue is that there appears to be more leniency towards Hudds this week from the MRP. I can accept that red card could be deemed sufficient for Greenwood however Hill almost decapitated two players and got away without a ban and I'm still scratching my head as too how they concluded that a cannonball tackle which is outlawed and can lead to extremely serious injury only lead to a caution

I've watched the challenge a few times and can't tell if it is direct contact to the head or not. The MRP have deemed it was so inevitable that he copped a ban. I think they have been very lenient with Greenwood, Hill and Knowles however I can't believe that the cannonball tackle by English only resulted in a warning. It was an awful challenge, the worst by far in the game and totally unnecessary, luckily Percival avoided serious injury. If it had been a Saints player I'm convinced he would have copped a heavy ban.

What a team we have!!! Backs to the wall in terms of injuries etc... No props yet still beat a team battling for top 6

SImilar tackle technique without the force Asiata applied. Not great but it is the RFL who need to give direction. The force Asiata applied was significant though

No anti saints bias to the drivel you spout Harry

To be fair they tend to save it all for Saints players. It's hard being so successful Just to be clear Knowles deserved his bam and I'm fed up with all the bans for late hits as it appears the likes of Sironen and Matautia on particular need to learn quickly. However I don't believe any player goes out to seriously injure another.

Most fans don't come on here to criticise players from their own teams. I don't know the figures on bans during this season but I would think Saints have had the most players banned (happy to be proved wrong) I think there have been a few soft bans but the vast majority have been fully justified.I haven't slated Asiata, I think that the threats etc... that he received are absolutely disgusting I just think his technique which also puts himself at serious risk is reckless and dangerous.