Bulls2487

Be harsh on York if they missed out in my opinion. If it's based on IMG 2025 ratings it should be Toulouse York and Bulls based on likely top 3 Championship clubs in the gradings.

Defo a strange one with Pele. He is out injured for 4-6 weeks with a calf injury picked up at Oldham

Heard this was a full Bulls team We had Tom Holmes Jorge Taufua Kieran Gill Tyran Ott Joe Keyes all missing from our squad. We also lost Ebon Scurr and Franklin Pele during game.

Nope I agree every club has its idiots but out of every Championship ground visited Fev was the only one we had trouble at and didn't feel welcome, hence the still low numbers.

That may be the case. I got the gradings pdf from RFL site. If outdated shouldn't be available on RFL site.

From the IMG gradings INSOLVENCY Downgrading of the club’s grade by one level i.e. from A to B for the year following the Insolvency event.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/34559691/salford-super-league-players-administration/

Racist chanting and the stewards weren't interested at the time and the atmosphere never felt welcoming. Exactly and the fans who went have passed that on so will probably see an increase each game now.

The Bulls support at Fev was better than previous years but still a way to go after previous trouble at Fev puts them off. 2000+ fans at Halifax. 4 buses going to Oldham this Friday

Wigan and Warrington pushed for Elstone to be appointed and look how that turned out. We can't rely on any clubs to choose. It needs to be taken away from the clubs.

It's unusual that the Council aren't interested in offering solutions or support. We have Park Avenue and Odsal neither that are fit for purpose and both owned by the Council.

Bradford Council are skint and just avoided bankruptcy. They have never really offered any support with a new stadium to any of the Bradford clubs.

I am a Bulls fan but the RFL changed the pitch length rules recently so the Bulls pitch does meet the requirements. Quite convenient if you ask me I wouldn't want to be parachuted in to SL we need to earn our way back in.

It would have to be a large amount of cash as attendances would drop when getting battered each week but still wouldn't make it worthwhile Some players may refuse to step as we are a part time club and when we get put back in the Championship for 2026 have lost half of team and have to re-build setting the club back.

That's true but I don't think it's a good look for any governing body to take over a club just to get it through the season, will end up a bunch of kids getting comfortably beat each week.

Needs to go to 11 teams for rest of the season for me if Salford can't survive We can't have the RFL prop up the club for rest of the season as be embarrassing for the sport.

It's unusual for such a long delay of investing in the club. Too many different answers and plenty of rumours flying around. Sounds similar to the Bulls in 2012 with the lies told I feel for the Salford fans.

Once you can forgive but a 2nd month is not a good look Someone needs to get a grip on the situation. 49k a day as mentioned by Gary Carter would of more than covered the wages.

Hearing rumours wages won't be paid tomorrow Anyone else heard the same?

If you have purchased an England ticket in past 9 years you also have a priority window of 48 hours from Monday 31st March

We struggled to overpower Barrow without Scurr and Pele without them we look weak in the middle.

What does this have to do with the RL family? If the new owners are serious about the club they need to put the money in Let's blame everyone else without looking at the real problems

Happy that a player got injured is the lowest of the low.

Tom Holmes was sent off for running in but no punches were thrown hence why it was sending off sufficient.

The Tribunal must work from the starting point of six-matches for an offence which sees punching to the head. This would apply to a minimum punching case and what we have here is an attack upon the first opponent who at the time was offering no aggression. It was an unprovoked attack which involved at least three punches aimed, one of which struck the head. When the second opponent intervened, he was given the same treatment, with sustained blows thrown towards the head, one of which again clearly makes contact Match Review Panel reviewed an incident which occurred in the above match where Mr Manning was dismissed following his actions. • Following a tackle, Mr Manning can be seen to throw punches three punches towards the head of his opponent Mr Blake, connecting with at least one punch to the head. • Mr Manning is then separated from his opponent by Mr Blake’s teammate, Mr Holmes and throws at least three punches, all towards the head area. • The MRP believe it to be an aggravating factor that Mr Manning is the only person within the incident who is throwing punches. • Grade E due to: - Multiple punches thrown, with a number which connect with the head area. - Player throws 2 punches at the head of an opponent who is not prepared. - Potential for injury to the head. Area of concern for the game. - Violent act which brings the sport into disrepute and portrays the game in a negative light.