GUBRATS

48 games ? Added to the ones already broadcast gives around 60 , how many do we normally supply ?

I fully understand your point , but again , what are you suggesting they do ? You combine the expansion argument with accepting what you consider is a poor broadcasting deal They are 2 different issues and are not connected We constantly see people on here criticising club owners as useless , and yet they've got themselves into a position to be a club owner , it's just a shame that those on here who seem to have all the answers haven't managed to get to that position

You'd hang around long enough to get your money out ? The longer you ' hang around ' the more it costs you I paid £ 22,500 for 3 shares in a RL club , I sold them for £ 1,500 a few years later , that was £ 1,499.99 more than they were worth

And the plan for relegation ?

Don't buy the bigger house , invest in a RL club instead , I did , you know it makes sense

That's all fine and dandy Dave Until they get relegated next year

Which is why I suggested a mini league of 9 rounds , then starting on Boxing Day to stretch next season out running up to the WC

Yes , it was incredibly stupid to push through essentially a full season so late in the year

Indeed , some charities rely on Oil rich countries to support them , they then masquerade as football teams

Or oil rich countries

If you can follow your team home and away great ( I believe a sizeable away support enhances most sports ) but it isn't mandatory

Obviously according to our friendly poster yipyee ? , I wonder who he used to be ?

Dodgy place , dodgy people , dodgy boxes

So if this isn't you suggesting club owners refusing the SKY deal , what is it ?

But as I pointed out , with the potential to lose half of SL , then there is no SL , just out of interest how long would the NRL last without broadcasting income ?